Signage, advertising and video billboards in Victoria
#41
Posted 06 September 2009 - 10:28 PM
Here is a history of the building.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#42
Posted 06 September 2009 - 10:41 PM
Your urban archaeology has been appreciated on Flickr. With one suggestion that the new owners should have left that exposed fragment and sealed it.
Here's a more artistic rendition:
http://www.flickr.co...378126/sizes/m/
#43
Posted 07 September 2009 - 12:41 AM
I guess I can confess that little bit of "urban archaeology" is my doing. After the workmen had gone home for the day I'd attack a little bit every few days with a putty knife. I uncovered the M'F'R (manufacturer) and worked my way up. By the time I got to the "A" the paint was stuck good and I gave up, not knowing what the word is (there are 411 possibilities). My guess is "Carriage" as they were once built there.
Here is a history of the building.
Looking closer, it appears that the letter above to A (of AGE) appears to have a flat bottom, at least flat on the portion right above the middle of the A. So that rules out letters like H, Q, R, O, P, A, F, K, X, N, and could maybe exclude a few more. Plug that into your thing ans see how many it cuts it down to.
#44
Posted 07 September 2009 - 06:18 AM
#45
Posted 07 September 2009 - 09:29 AM
Looking closer, it appears that the letter above to A (of AGE) appears to have a flat bottom, at least flat on the portion right above the middle of the A. So that rules out letters like H, Q, R, O, P, A, F, K, X, N, and could maybe exclude a few more. Plug that into your thing ans see how many it cuts it down to.
I pulled this from the URL on the history of the building, 1991 image when the place was a bingo hall.
The 'A' in Wm Marble's name matches the 'A' in the sign fragment, and since Wm Marble made carriages...
C
A
R
R
I
A
G
E
M'F'R' (for Manufacturer)
#46
Posted 07 September 2009 - 09:34 AM
Hmmm, except if you look at the E, the left side is very wide, and then the drop shadow would put a shadow that far to the right w/o too much problem. So I don't think you can rule out R (etc), which would make "garage" a contender.
It's CARRIAGE as the urban archaeologist guessed.
I rest my case based on the evidence provided.
#47
Posted 16 September 2009 - 05:48 PM
And remember the letters to the various local papers predicting accidents and traffic mayhem caused by the arena's sign?
I was just thinking of that today as I was being "blinded" by it. What a bunch of huey over nothing.
#48
Posted 16 September 2009 - 05:59 PM
#49
Posted 16 September 2009 - 06:51 PM
#50
Posted 16 September 2009 - 08:12 PM
#51
Posted 16 September 2009 - 08:51 PM
#52
Posted 16 September 2009 - 10:35 PM
But I sure don't need to see any more of its kind.
#53
Posted 17 September 2009 - 08:32 AM
I'd love to see these sorts of signs used in an artistic or creative way, to highlight and illuminate buildings and business names at night, a contemporary version of the old neon signs. That would look particularly lovely in the dark and wet of winter. The public big-screen TV aesthetic leaves something to be desired.
#54
Posted 17 September 2009 - 10:26 AM
I totally agree! Large projections are amazing at night!
#55
Posted 17 September 2009 - 11:19 AM
Well I wouldn't be surprised if we find them popping up all over the place. It's not like the city has much of a leg to stand on with regards to discouraging them since they set a new precedent with the arena.
There were a couple of issues that were raised with the arena sign.
The first was size and brightness being a distraction. There were some days and light levels which were initially a problem, but I think that has been resolved now.
Th second issue was the idea of using signage as a 3rd party billboard rather than promoting the specific business owning the sign. At first the city challenged some of the content (especially since the city is supposed to get 25% of the content for free to promote local events and services) but either by design or lack of complaints nobody seems to care anymore. When there are no upcoming events the sign is pretty much exclusively used for 3rd party paid content.
It is the second point that I was more concerned about with respect to precedent. I have no issues with a nice attractive digital sign promoting a business. What I have a problem with are electronic billboards popping up all over town.
#56
Posted 15 October 2009 - 03:11 PM
Squamish Nation approves digital billboards by December
http://www.vancouver...7037/story.html
By Graeme Wood, Vancouver Sun
October 15, 2009
The Squamish Nation council approved the construction of six digital billboards on its land in Vancouver, the North Shore, and Squamish today in an effort to increase revenues for the band.
#57
Posted 17 October 2009 - 10:17 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#58
Posted 17 October 2009 - 10:21 AM
#60
Posted 30 December 2009 - 11:59 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users