Geoff Young | Victoria | Council - VV Endorsed
#1
Posted 05 November 2008 - 09:12 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#2
Posted 18 November 2008 - 10:34 AM
Toughen candidate entry rules
Published: Tuesday, November 18, 2008
The guy who wore the clown nose to the City of Victoria local election meetings pretty much summed up the attitude of many of his fellow candidates -- that it was a big joke.
These people found at least two voters to sign their nomination papers and were now "candidates," invited to make speeches to respectful community gatherings and to see their pictures in the newspaper.
Some call this democracy, but in fact it's the opposite. Meetings don't have the time, and newspapers don't have the space, for serious new candidates to discuss the issues.
The result, as we saw, is that incumbents are almost assured of re-election.
I suggested a solution early last term. Office-seekers would be required to produce 20 or 30 voters' signatures on their nomination papers, not two, and to post a deposit of, say, $300 to be refunded if they receive at least half the votes of the lowest-tallying candidate elected.
We would be doing a favour to any candidate who thinks $300 (about one-quarter of one per cent of the stipend they would earn over the term) is a lot to gamble.
It's hard to run a serious independent campaign for 10 times that amount.
Geoff Young
councillor
#3
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:28 PM
http://www.qp.gov.bc...htm#section72.1
specifically: (2) The amount of a required nomination deposit may be different for the different offices referred to in subsection (1), but must not be greater than $100.
I do support raising the number of signatures to 25 and 100 for council and mayor respectively.
#4
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:32 PM
Putting up with candidates who held little or no respect for the public throughout this campaign was aggravating. From Jones, who disturbed meetings, to Dodds, who spraypainted signs, this campaign was straight out of Air Farce.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#5
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:36 PM
No one wants to deter candidates but some take all the oxygen (press coverage/ all candidate meetings/ messing with others signs etc) and make the ballot dauntingly long and confusing for voters. They do not bother to campaign - do not show respect to their counterparts - and treat it like a joke/ playground for media attention.
Time to set some boundaries. I hope Geoff can bring about that change at the council table and let us know which incumbants vote against it.
#6
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:39 PM
The problem isn't poor candidates, it is single issue activists manipulating the system for cheap media exposure. If a homeless person is willing to run a respectful campaign, that shouldn't be a problem. The problem starts where the respect ends.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#7
Posted 18 November 2008 - 04:50 PM
The problem starts where the respect ends.
I agree. So a 'code of conduct' letter to accompany the candidates package - and if there is one breech you are removed from the campaign and cannot run for two terms. No messing with signs, no chasing candidates, no pressuring candidates to donate their income to your favourite charity, no yelling, no heckling, no sitting on the floor, and you need to be quiet when another candidate is answering a voter's question. And last but not least - no clown noses within 300 meters of an all-candidates meeting or polling station!
My kids had to sign stuff like that in kindergarden - but it had more to do with sticking bubble gum under their desks and taking off their wet boots.
#8
Posted 18 November 2008 - 05:12 PM
Far as the minimum number of nominators is concerned, as I mentioned previously here, provincial law seems to set it at 2, 10, or 25 in the case of larger municipalities. Theoretically Victoria could go higher than this, but I don't know if any municipality has done so.
A deposit of hundreds of dollars may be too great a limitation for some people. Instead, I suggest that Victoria do what Saanich does, and publish the nomination papers online. Also, put a notice in bold type just below where the nominators are supposed to sign, telling them that the papers will appear on the city's website for all to see. Then anyone who's thinking of signing the papers just to make the annoying would-be candidate go away will think twice about it.
#9
Posted 18 November 2008 - 05:15 PM
1000 signatures? Tavis could have gotten that. $300. No problem.
The code of conduct is a much better idea.
Banning clown noses is a bad idea though.
#10
Posted 18 November 2008 - 05:21 PM
I hear what people are saying about the number of candidates limiting what each candidate was able to say, but I also think that other processes should be in place to help people decide.
And I defend Georgia-Anne even less, but if you were not able to tell the difference between Reid and Fortin at the meetings, you should have given them a call or email or drop by the office. Don't rely on these meetings to bythe sole factor in your decision. The same should apply to any council candidate, although 35 is a lot of people to call.
But anyway, that's sort of off-topic.
On-topic, why should Geoff Young be complaining that only the incumbants got in? He should be thanking the 'not serious' candidates if that's the case.
#11
Posted 18 November 2008 - 05:32 PM
I agree that clown noses are fine. The rest of the list of behaviours should carry a penalty.
I disagree that all-candidates meetings are not the right format to distinguish between candidates. I think that is what they are intended for. I also think it is perfectly reasonable for any group within the community to invite only the candidates they think are interesting to talk at a meeting, just as long as they are TOTALLY transparent and up-front that this is not an all-candidates meeting.
Making it hard for voters to hear their candidates in order to point out that it is hard to get informed about candidates just doesn't make sense.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#12
Posted 15 September 2014 - 09:10 PM
Im gonna give Geoff a good ol' for Nov. 15.
“To understand cities, we have to deal outright with combinations or mixtures of uses, not separate uses, as the essential phenomena.”
- Jane Jacobs
#13
Posted 15 September 2014 - 09:20 PM
Just a reminder this is the 2008 election thread
Please feel free to make a 2014 thread in the 2014 sub-forum.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users