Posted 22 May 2017 - 01:02 PM
^ No surprise as he has been blogging about this for months and of course no benefit from his previous role and strict enforcement of pot policies!
It is going to be really interesting to see how the Feds handle regulation and taxation. This is about the tenth reference now I have seen to FN from pot companies and the primary driver behind that would have to be taxation (or lack thereof) as I have discussed before. You would have to think that the feds will need to enforce some type of packaging and labelling as they do with cigarettes to try and control distribution, or else set the tax rate so low that the benefit to non-licensed producers is muted.
Ya, I'm starting to wonder how they will do this. If I can produce it at home fairly cheaply, and there is no danger to me in being arrested for carrying it around, I'm not sure why amateur growers and dealers would not thrive, if the taxes are high. It's a lot easier to produce, transport and sell than say alcohol.
What's the ideal outdoor growing conditions for the stuff? I mean, it seems dumb that we are growing it inside buildings now. We do not do that with other crops. Would the Okanagan be the right place for it, to grow outdoors?
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>