Jump to content

      



























Photo

2017 BC General Election + subsequent fallout


  • Please log in to reply
2617 replies to this topic

#761 DavidSchell

DavidSchell
  • Member
  • 687 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 12:33 PM

So once again today I read in the Opinion section of the paper an NDP supporter does not understand why the Green's don't step aside to allow the NDP to get the seat so the Liberal's do not get reelected. 

 

So once again I must say this is not about preventing the Liberals from gaining power again it is about electing GREENS. If NDP supporters are so concerned about stopping the Liberals from winning another election then they should vote GREEN!!!!



#762 rjag

rjag
  • Member
  • 6,363 posts
  • LocationSi vis pacem para bellum

Posted 30 April 2017 - 02:18 PM

If the NDP think the only way they can win an election by berating and lecturing others, then they are basically doomed to never win. 

 

Heres an idea, why not earn some votes based on merit and good policy instead of fearmongering and moaning.....just saying


  • Hotel Mike, bluefox, jonny and 1 other like this

#763 bluefox

bluefox

    ex-Victorian

  • Member
  • 697 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 02:27 PM

I don't understand how people can sit there and lament declining voter turnout or participation in our democracy and then turn around and scream bloody murder that there is now a viable third party — something that could honestly help reverse those trends.

 

Would I ever vote Green? Maybe, maybe not. Either way, sounds pretty great to me.

 

NDP strategy in this campaign has been just as awful as 2013, the only difference this time is they're not pretending to be nice.


Edited by bluefox, 30 April 2017 - 02:27 PM.

  • jonny likes this
(Not the owner of, nor am I associated with, the Blue Fox Café, in any way.)

#764 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 02:32 PM

I don't understand how people can sit there and lament declining voter turnout or participation in our democracy and then turn around and scream bloody murder that there is now a viable third party — something that could honestly help reverse those trends.

 

Let's wait and see.  "Viable party" might be clouded by our perspective here on the Island.  From where we sit maybe the Greens look viable federally.  But they lost votes last election and are but a blip.


  • Daveyboy and 57WestHills like this
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#765 57WestHills

57WestHills
  • Member
  • 1,272 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 04:50 PM

Just waited twenty minutes to vote. That's probably a good thing.
  • DavidSchell likes this

#766 DavidSchell

DavidSchell
  • Member
  • 687 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 05:23 PM

Just waited twenty minutes to vote. That's probably a good thing.

 

Same for me, nice to see people wanting to get out a vote so early.



#767 LJ

LJ
  • Member
  • 12,742 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 07:25 PM

There is always a huge turnout for the advance polls, shows that lots of people aren't listening to the rhetoric and know who they are voting for.

 

The general election day seems to be for the people who need to read lawn signs to make up their mind.


Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.

#768 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 07:59 PM

Luckily Esquimalt has Desjardins,.......

the rare candidate that I would vote against no matter which party she ran for.



#769 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 08:44 PM

I don't think I have seen a provincial election in Canada in the last 20 years with as little public polling as we have seen for this election.  So little polling that it tells us almost nothing.

 

I suspect there are two reasons (1) news organizations are pretty broke, (2) public polling can be free advertising for polling firms but the polling firms are wary of getting egg on their face like 2013.

 

With little or now public polling to rely on the safest prediction is to go with recent patterns

 

1) The NDP will win most of the seats on the island

2) The centre right party will win the election

3) Greens will underperform expectations


  • zoomer and John M. like this

#770 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 09:47 PM

http://www.mainstree...st-debate-poll/

 

BC Post debate poll



#771 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 30 April 2017 - 10:04 PM

Yet, the NDP are out in force saying that Green voters are vote splitters who will cost the NDP the election -

Parties who are competing for the same voters generally tend to fight more viciously (during campaigns at least) than parties on the opposite sides of the spectrum.  Weaver spent more time attacking Horgan than Clark in the last debate. Mulclair spent more time attacking JT than Harper in the last federal elections.

 

According to the last Mainstreet poll Green voters prefer the NDP as a second choice over the Liberals by a 10:1 margin (74%, 7%, 19 undecided) so it is totally rational for the NDP to be wooing Green voters.

 

Interestingly in this survey Liberal voters in the aggregate obviously recognize that the Greens are the furthest away from their desired policies as Liberal voters would prefer to vote for the rival NDP than for the upstart Greens


  • zoomer and tedward like this

#772 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,560 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 05:37 AM

Strategically Liberals are voting for the Greens in local ridings. My sense is they'll take Saanich and the Islands and Oak Bay Gordon Head. Victoria Beacon Hill will be a very tight race between the NDP and the Greens.

As for ESQ-Metchosin, finally the Liberals have a candidate with serious name recognition and that might spur Liberal voters who've chucked their votes in previous elections or strategically voted for the Greens to now back their candidate.
  • rjag likes this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#773 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 08:13 AM

Strategically Liberals are voting for the Greens in local ridings. My sense is they'll take Saanich and the Islands and Oak Bay Gordon Head. Victoria Beacon Hill will be a very tight race between the NDP and the Greens.

As for ESQ-Metchosin, finally the Liberals have a candidate with serious name recognition and that might spur Liberal voters who've chucked their votes in previous elections or strategically voted for the Greens to now back their candidate.

Greens are a lock in OB and highly probable in Saanich North and the Islands. That said Saanich North and the Islands is one of the relatively few  places on Vancouver Island where Liberals have a shot (long shot, but not zero) so arguably the "strategic" thing for a Liberal supporter there is to actually vote Liberal.



#774 Greg

Greg
  • Member
  • 3,362 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 08:19 AM

Same candidates are running in Saanich North and the Islands as last election. The Liberal came closer to beating the NDP there than the Green candidate (and the Liberal started later), so it doesn't really make sense for a Liberal supporter to strategically vote Green in that riding.There was a recount last time, I imagine it will be an equally close three-way race this time.


  • John M. likes this

#775 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 16,310 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 08:40 AM

Had an interesting chat with 95-year old Reg, a lifelong UK-born left-wing voter who cast his ballot for the BC Provincial election the other day in advance polling. He recalls voting in the 1945 UK election, the one that tossed out Churchill in favour of Labour.

 

Personally, I'm worried if the Greens don't pick up at least one more seat the entire movement will fizzle out.


Edited by Rob Randall, 01 May 2017 - 08:43 AM.

  • John M. likes this

#776 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 09:18 AM

Same candidates are running in Saanich North and the Islands as last election. The Liberal came closer to beating the NDP there than the Green candidate (and the Liberal started later), so it doesn't really make sense for a Liberal supporter to strategically vote Green in that riding.There was a recount last time, I imagine it will be an equally close three-way race this time.

 

But every Green riding win is one less for the NDP, no?  If every Island riding went Green, for example, the Liberals will win the election.  NDP needs the Island ridings.


  • tedward and bluefox like this
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#777 Awaiting Juno

Awaiting Juno
  • Member
  • 1,512 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC

Posted 01 May 2017 - 10:17 AM

But every Green riding win is one less for the NDP, no?  If every Island riding went Green, for example, the Liberals will win the election.  NDP needs the Island ridings.

 

The NDP need to focus on their own platform and giving people a reason to vote for them.  That means in ridings where there's a substantial number of reasonably well-off people that you don't go and give them the one finger salute while asking them to pay ever more taxes and then expect them to vote for you to keep the Liberals from forming government.  If there's more Green in the legislature that's a good thing - further, the Green platform is compelling and the candidates seem to be well equipped to take on the roles that they will have if elected.  A Liberal minority government that needs the support of either NDP or Green members to get things done is not and should not be seen as a bad thing.


  • bluefox and DavidSchell like this

#778 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 10:23 AM

Personally, I'm worried if the Greens don't pick up at least one more seat the entire movement will fizzle out.

BC Provincial:

2001 - 12.4% Green

2005 - 9.2% Green

2009 - 8.2% Green

2013 - 8.1% Green

 

Canada Federal

2000 - 0.9%

2004 - 4.3%

2006 - 4.5%

2008 - 6.8%

2011 - 3.9%

2015 - 3.4%

 

The trends aren't encouraging. That said the very few polls are a bit more encouraging for the Greens.



#779 DavidSchell

DavidSchell
  • Member
  • 687 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 10:38 AM

Latest Poll:

 

BC Liberals (43%, +4) and NDP (41%, -3) in Tight Race (Greens 14%, +2). Neither Clark (29%, -1) Nor Horgan (26%, -2) Gaining Advantage as Best Premier (Weaver 15%, +4)

 

http://www.ipsos-na....se.aspx?id=7635



#780 nerka

nerka
  • Member
  • 1,236 posts

Posted 01 May 2017 - 10:47 AM

That means in ridings where there's a substantial number of reasonably well-off people that you don't go and give them the one finger salute while asking them to pay ever more taxes and then expect them to vote for you to keep the Liberals from forming government.

 

I think it is possible to objectively state that the Green's plan expects the "moderately well-off" to pay more in taxes than does the NDP's plan.

 

Green fiscal plan:

3% tax increase on income above 108K

Increase corporate tax to 12%

eliminate boutique tax credits

carbon tax from $30 tonne to $70 tonne

 

NDP fiscal plan

"restore the top marginal tax rate"  = 2.1% increase on income above 151 K

Increase corporate tax to 12%

Decrease small business rate from 2.5% to 2%

carbon tax from $30 to $50



You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users