I know the court has deemed her no longer capable or whatever, so hard to get a quote from her.
But you know, maybe she just timed her age right, gambled - what she liked doing - right up until she ran out of money and went into a home.
Anyway, hopefully they play a lit of high-stakes bingo at the home.
What we know from the article is that since 2000 (when apparently she had $100K) she has spent $300K more than what she had as income and is now $200K in debt. We also know that she liked going to the casino. I don't think that anyone established that she lost all of the money at the casino.