Real Estate News
#21
Posted 06 October 2007 - 12:49 PM
#22
Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:08 PM
1950:
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#23
Posted 16 October 2007 - 07:27 AM
I always assumed that was an eighties building. Looked much nicer back then.
#24
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:12 PM
REAL ESTATE
Our house is a very, very, very rich house
Scrimping for a place to live takes on a new meaning in Victoria, where prices are through the roof
JUSTINE HUNTER
Globe and Mail
August 4, 2007
VICTORIA -- When agent Robert Milloy listed two "trophy" properties in Victoria this week for record prices, he took the lead in a stampede by his competitors to tap into an elite international market.
"They are coming for all the things we take for granted: Clean air, a stunning environment, safe streets," said Mr. Milloy, of Sotheby's International Realty Canada. "In the world market, these are perceived as exceptional value."
In recent weeks, more than half a dozen homes with asking prices in excess of $10-million have hit the market in Victoria, each one more expensive than the last listing. The listings are being marketed in places such as London and Los Angeles, the prices listed in euros and U.S. dollars.
[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070804.BCHOMES04/TPStory/TPNational/BritishColumbia/:4dd78]More>>>[/url:4dd78]
there's no way they'll get that much for those houses. The most that a house in the Victoria area has ever sold for was about $10,500,000, which in that case was just under $1000/sqft. Villa Madrona on Land's End Rd is comparable to the Sweet Pea & it went on the market for close to $20 million & has been reduced many times since then. (it's also a nicer house imho) That house across the road from the Sweet Pea which sticks out into Cadboro Bay is on 1.75 acres & 10,000 sqft; last year it sold for $9,500,000. That Swanwick Ranch (the one in Metchosin) is going for more than $3000/sqft & requires no further comment, even though it's on 64 acres & won an architecture award when it was completed.
#25
Posted 20 November 2007 - 07:15 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#26
Posted 20 November 2007 - 07:30 PM
#27
Posted 20 November 2007 - 07:34 PM
As much as I might have preferred the original buildings on this block, I have to admit they ultimately did a good job with that one. Now if only somebody would spruce up the Shoppers Drug Mart...
#28
Posted 20 November 2007 - 07:36 PM
#29
Posted 13 January 2008 - 11:29 PM
VANCOUVER'S ISLAND.
December 26, 1853, Wednesday
The New York Times
Page 2, 220 words
The term (five years) for which Vancouver's Island was granted to the Hudson's Bay Company being about to expire, a majority of the white settlers have petitioned the British Parliament to take the Island under its special management, instead of giving the reins of government into the hands of a Hudson's Bay factor, as heretofore. In their memorial to Parliament, they say: "The attempt at colonizing Vancouver's Island may, so far, be considered as a failure -- one principal cause of which is the high price charged for land, while in Oregon but a few miles distant, (and that distance daily traversed in ca???? and open boats) the United States Government makes liberal gratuitous grants to actual settlers. British subjects have come to the Island, from California and elsewhere, with the intention of settling; but on arriving and learning the actual condition of the colony, have been deterred by the high price of land, and by the ???est hopelessness of its settlement within any reasonable period, owing the this and other similar administrative causes and not by any means to any defect in its soil, climate, or other natural properties. Consequently, under these discouraging circumstances, they have gone southward, and increased the population of Oregon.
Copyright © The New York Times
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#30
Posted 14 January 2008 - 02:41 AM
#31
Posted 14 January 2008 - 08:54 AM
#32
Posted 14 January 2008 - 09:17 AM
I'm all for density, but there has to be a reason for a large population. The reason Holland became prosperous is the same reason Vancouver or San Francisco are prosperous - they are major ports feeding a large inland population (by river or rail). I don't think Victoria (or Archangel) have much of a chance to become rich in that way.
#33
Posted 14 January 2008 - 09:25 AM
The reality is that Victoria is now facing a 2.9 percent unemployment rate and we need people here now.
Victoria is a diverse economy that includes: High tech, tourism, education/research, resource extraction, government, manufacturing, fishing, aerospace.
While it may not be on the same level as Toronto, Vancouver etc...
And yes we do discourage immigration though it is mostly done through our own perception of ourselves.
#34
Posted 14 January 2008 - 10:01 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#35
Posted 14 January 2008 - 10:44 AM
And yes we do discourage immigration though it is mostly done through our own perception of ourselves.
That may be one of the truest statements I have ever heard about our little city.
#36
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:28 PM
I'm not at all convinced that the reason Victoria is not a regional economic powerhouse has a lot to do with a small-minded attitude of the residents, but I am willing to be convinced otherwise.
#37
Posted 14 January 2008 - 03:27 PM
Another is the way we market ourselves. ( sleepy british tourist town by the sea where it is perpetually spring). This leads to those that consider Victoria for relocation be disapointed once they are here. Just look thought the letters to the editor that are always saying that Victoria has too many tall building I moved to Victoria to get away from tall building. etc etc.
Another part is that as a large number of independant munis we compete between ourselves rather than marketing ourselves as one product. So we dilute our ability to penetrate markets further afield to recruit and encourage in-migration.
#38
Posted 14 January 2008 - 05:45 PM
We have to stop thinking of ourselves as a sleepy backwater if we ever want to be taken seriously.
#39
Posted 14 January 2008 - 09:46 PM
PS: people who come here just to retire or perhaps to enjoy a "resort" "lifestyle" or whatever it's marketed as (and Vancouver has some of those issues, too) represent (IMO) dead money. Their dollars go into the local economy at the consumption level, but once they've bought and stocked their condos with all the necessary tchotchkes, that's it -- the rest of their assets are dead to the community. And if they're really well-off, they're more likely to endow a library wing or something like that in the city the came from, than to do so for any of Greater Victoria's institutions.
I am absolutely thrilled that there are more entrepreneurs in Victoria now, and that they are making their mark in high tech, biotech, green tech, you name it -- and I really hope that we'll grow a whole crop of folks like that, who will feel committed to this place, and who'll give back in important ways. But it's early days here still.
#40
Posted 16 January 2008 - 12:14 PM
I'm not saying you guys haven't gotten your impression somewhere. Clearly you seem frustrated by a small town attitude here. But I don't see that attitude reflected in anything substantive that would discourage business. Conversely, I think lots light and information-based business would like it here: beautiful city, lots to do.
The biggest problem is that its kind of slow for a bright 20 something, and so they go to bigger cities, where the new ideas are germinated (I left when I was 20-something). Maybe if Victoria wants to do something to encourage innovation, it should work on making this a hipper place to live. Vibrant arts, more basic research, a better nightlife downtown... I do see substantive things the city does that discourage this.
Amalgamation is a good point too. So much could be simplified if there were three cities instead of 23 or however many there are now.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users