Amalgamation of Victoria municipalities
#1
Posted 06 August 2006 - 08:26 AM
Amalgamation would cost freedom
Re: “Province should make us one,” letter, Aug. 1.
The letter-writer makes the same assertion that most proponents of amalgamation make: “There would be considerable savings to taxpayer.” Yet, whenever the powers-that-be are asked if taxes will decrease as a result, the answer is “No.”
The writer goes on to suggest that the greater advantage is in having one body setting regional development. I agree that there are advantages, but there are also dangers. The needs of the western communities are different from other regions. Is it likely that these needs will be met by a council that’s elected primarily by the more populated municipalities? As an example, Langford has chosen to allow big box stores and has benefited from the increased tax base. Would Langford residents have been as accepting of these stores if the increased revenue were spent on improvements in Oak Bay?
Greg Aleknevicus, Colwood.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#2
Posted 07 August 2006 - 04:40 AM
I can relate to his fears. If I lived out there I wouldn't want anything to do with the core muncipalities.
As a residence of the Core Municipalities I would love to have the Western Communities Voice and Vote to elect better councils into power. I bet Pam wouldn't even come 10th place if it was a one city council election. Sooke to Sidney.
#3
Posted 09 August 2006 - 12:45 PM
1. Victoria, Oak Bay, Esquimalt, Saanich = Victoria
2. Central Saanich, North Saanich, Sidney, Highlands = Saanich Peninsula
3. View Royal, Colwood, Langford, Metchosin, Sooke = WestShore
- 57WestHills and Laszlow like this
#4
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:49 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#5
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:50 PM
I would even possibly put View Royal in the Core group.
I may even put Saltspring in with Sidney / north Saanich and the Pen.
#6
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:52 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#7
Posted 09 August 2006 - 09:28 PM
I would even possibly put View Royal in the Core group.
What if we split it up? Colwood overpass west would be West Shore and east of it would be part of the Core.
#8
Posted 09 August 2006 - 09:45 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#9
Posted 09 August 2006 - 09:48 PM
#10
Posted 09 August 2006 - 09:51 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#11
Posted 10 August 2006 - 12:52 AM
- Laszlow likes this
#12
Posted 10 August 2006 - 01:36 AM
I would leave and head for the mainland thank you very much.
#13
Posted 10 August 2006 - 09:30 AM
How about if the whole province split from B.C. and became one province
huh? :?
#14
Posted 10 August 2006 - 10:19 AM
The way its layed out puts more emphasis on its border with colwood than anywhere else.
VR is like a suburb ofthe westshore.
#15
Posted 10 August 2006 - 11:46 AM
1. Victoria, Oak Bay, Esquimalt, Saanich and View Royal = Victoria
2. Central Saanich, North Saanich, Sidney and Highlands = Saanich Peninsula
3. Colwood, Langford, Metchosin and Sooke = WestShore
#16
Posted 10 August 2006 - 06:28 PM
#17
Posted 03 September 2006 - 10:06 AM
We will all pay for Highlands water
Times Colonist
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Victorians who haven't visited the Bear Mountain subdivision clawing its way up the hills of Langford and the Highlands should do so, because our water board plans for all of us to help pay the utility bills for the new residents.
A pipeline is needed to get water through Langford to the Highlands, and the water board has decided that all its customers -- not just the Highlands -- will help pay for the line and the growth it supports.
By subsidizing sprawl, the water board is working against its own conservation policies. Homes on large lots use more water than denser urban dwellings.
The Highlands was established separate from Langford because it planned for rural residences that would draw on groundwater rather than the regional water supply. Now its mayor and council have decided to accept new development.
The dollar amounts are small, a few cents a month for most of us, but confirming the principle that we all pay will become more important if another municipality decides to "diversify its tax base" -- code for allowing the desire for more property taxes to determine the community plan.
Maybe it is fair to ask city dwellers to pay for the costs of servicing new suburbs. If so, it is also fair to ask those suburbs to pay the cost of downtown policing and social costs. In a single municipality we would all pitch in on everything.
What the water board wants is selective amalgamation. The low-density municipalities don't contribute to the costs of downtown, but expect the downtown to help pay for expensive utility services when they need them.
Geoff Young,
councillor,
City of Victoria.
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2006
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#18
Posted 03 September 2006 - 01:50 PM
Thanks Holden for posting this. I read the paper and totaly missed this article.
I would liketo respond with a reply to this.
#19
Posted 03 September 2006 - 02:11 PM
Stet.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#20
Posted 03 September 2006 - 02:25 PM
I guess it's hard sometimes to decide when to start a new thread or keep everything in one.
personally I find it keeps things neater if you seperate articles and ideas into different threads...the draw back to it however is you have a huge list of threads...though it makes it easier to find things as you can search the threads rather than sifting through hundreds of posts on one thread...
It's hard to say I guess.....Just my thoughts...
either way thanks for posting...it should be in the amalgamation topic!!!
Cheers Scaper :-)
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users