Advocate: economy-size discounted mouthwash can kill
A local advocate working with Victoria’s Downtown street community is upset at a local retailer’s potentially fatal promotion.
Margaret O’Donnell, Executive Director of The Oasis Society for the Spiritual Health of Victoria says that prominently displayed sale-priced mouthwash at the new Saanich WalMart is proving to be too tempting for local hard-core alcoholics.
O’Donnell contacted Uptown’s WalMart manager to let him know that two homeless individuals cashed their government cheque and walked to the box store’s pharmacy last Tuesday afternoon and bought four $4.95 bottles of Listerine mouthwash. The two walked back into town and proceeded to ingest all four bottles over the course of the rest of the afternoon. By 7:00 p.m. they were rushed to hospital with alcohol poisoning.
One litre bottles of Listerine on display near the entrance of the Uptown WalMart. The $5.79 price displayed this week is well below the regular price offered at many Downtown pharmacies. Photo by Robert Randall © VibrantVictoria.ca.
O’Donnell says that mouthwashes, which can contain up to 27 percent alcohol, should be stocked behind the pharmacy counter and should only be dispensed upon request and at the pharmacist’s discretion.
O’Donnell is also concerned about the easy availability of one-litre jugs of 99 percent isopropyl alcohol on sale for less than five dollars, noting that while restricting the sale large bottles of non-beverage alcohol will not stop binge drinking, it may reduce instances of its abuse.
Many Victoria-area alcoholics are banned from downtown pharmacies for reasons related to alcohol abuse. Pharmacy policies regarding mouthwash vary although most have their mouthwash stocked over the counter. Downtown’s View Street Pharmacy offers one-litre bottles of Listerine on store shelves at $8.95.
Recent research has shown that British Columbia’s per-capita alcohol consumption is rising at a faster rate than in the rest of Canada. The BC Coalition for Action on Alcohol Reform says the annual cost of alcohol abuse in BC is $2.2 billion, or $536 per person. Many harm reduction experts favour “wet shelters” as a way of stabilizing hard-core alcoholics who are unable to quit drinking. Residents living in a wet shelter are given small servings of alcohol on a regular basis by health professionals. This greatly reduces incidences of excessive drinking and allows alcoholics to live healthier, more productive lives.
Homelessness and drug abuse are discussed here on VibrantVictoria’s forum.
Copyright © 2010 by VibrantVictoria.ca. All rights reserved.
Responses to this Headline or Article
The five most recent replies to VibrantVictoria.ca's discussion forum's Victoria homelessness / drug abuse issues thread, the most relevant thread to the above headline or article:
VicHockeyFan
Mar 19, 2012 at 1:00 amQuote: Your math is out a bit, that 110m is only for 719 residences, which essentially doubles your unit cost.
Oh, ok, then we have over $2350 for each homeless person, per month. That'll get them each a two-bedroom at the Aria.
JohnN
Mar 19, 2012 at 7:03 amInteresting that the headline shouting out on page A1 was the $110 million capital cost, but the annual cost of $13.7 million over 7 years equals $95.9 millions, and with the capital cost, the actual total estimate is
Wouldn't a headline of $206 million be even
Good public relations to get a Sunday paper front-page story - and without the actual report available for critical review.
Monitor their website to see if/when its posted:
maniac78
Mar 19, 2012 at 9:19 amQuote: OK, then. How exactly do we make themnot be unemployed drug addicts?
Arrest them and force them into treatment.
tedward
Mar 19, 2012 at 10:30 amQuote: I'm glad you asked. Well, I can't solve the unemployed drug-addict part, but I can solve the homelessness, although I'm not confident that employing my method won't attract more homeless from other parts of the country.
But here's what we do...
We don't agree on everything but this sounds like a plan that might work. Too bad it makes sense as it means none of Fortin, Clark, or Harper could support it.
martini
Mar 19, 2012 at 10:38 amQuote: We don't agree on everything but this sounds like a plan that might work. Too bad it makes sense as it means none of Fortin, Clark, or Harper could support it.
I was just about to post the same thing. That VHF and I don't always agree, but I do agree with him here.
You're right. It makes sense which means it won't get a second glance.
The calculations done here and the costs just astound me!
