![Photo](https://vibrantvictoria.ca/forum/uploads/profile/photo-thumb-1196.jpg?_r=1474813856)
[Trans Canada Highway] McKenzie Interchange - McKenzie Avenue, Admirals Road and TCH
#1
Posted 18 December 2009 - 08:49 PM
If you could keep the vehicles moving, commuters would be less inclined to detour through View Royal, Esquimalt and Vic West on their way in from the Western Communities.
The interchange was estimated to cost $17 million in 2000, but would likely be $50 million by now, with no signs of anything happening any time soon. A full interchange is probably not needed as the main need is for the traffic turning off and onto the Trans-Canada highway at McKenzie.
According to BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, there are 80 to 90 thousand vehicles per day passing west of that location, as counted during July 2009.
http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/TrafficData/
If there was ever an important infrastructure project, this is the one that has been talked about the longest. The money that is slated to be spent on a new Johnson Street Bridge, could have been better spent there. If an interchange can help alleviate traffic using the Point Ellis and Johnson Street Bridges, then the investment would be a sound one.
#2
Posted 19 December 2009 - 12:34 AM
#3
Posted 19 December 2009 - 07:54 AM
There will always be the case of tansferring the problem to the next stop light, but that could be said for any interchange. The new interchange on the Pat Bay highway near the airport is an example. There will still be a light at Beacon Avenue and the highway a few KM.s to the north.
#4
Posted 19 December 2009 - 08:42 AM
I think that the Mackenzie Overpass also provides multiple benefits, first of all the tillicum light issue is a red herring that is always thrown out when this is discussed and really that only applies to the morning traffic. The real benefits to the overpass are the improvement of the pm rush out of the city which ends up backing internal city traffic along Douglas street and also the access to and from mackenzie avenue which serves as a bypass to Hwy 17.
#5
Posted 19 December 2009 - 08:59 AM
To the uninitiated our buildings are nothing to look at from any of these streets...get into the centre, the heart, the courtyard of this package of land and you are surrounded by tall, beautifuly matured trees, shrubs of every spiecies imaginable and a venerable bird santuary. We also host the largest privately owned pool in Victoria.
Our community of 300 we are cheek by jowl, we know each others kids, pets names and who needs the steps shoveled because they can't when it snows. We know if we haven't seen Mr. So'nso for a bit to check on him and that once a week a unit on the other side of the pool always needs help on Friday at 5pm bringing in her groceries. Grams on the Burnside side, she always walks the property at 5:30 am in her jammies with a coffee mug in her hand (nothing ever in it) and the young lad who saved his money to buy in here with wages from working as a dishwasher moved in with nothing gets all furniture, dishes etc. that we would cast-off to the thrift store.
I understand over the years nobody has really spoken up much from this little community - but I and a few other community minded folks live there now, we are loud-mouths and magically some of the old timers have found their voices.
Anyway.....the old timers and even new-timers have noticed a marked increase in traffic since last summer - and a number of other things (increase in exhaust etc.). We have written to various agencies for help and been pretty much blown off.
We are now stragegising.
Our issues are increase in traffic, traffic idling far to long, speed and when traffic is backed up (morning & evening rush hour which by the way seems to be longer than even just a few years past) our entry exit is impossible and finally visibility.
#6
Posted 19 December 2009 - 09:01 AM
#7
Posted 19 December 2009 - 09:04 AM
#8
Posted 19 December 2009 - 09:18 AM
#9
Posted 19 December 2009 - 10:24 AM
#10
Posted 19 December 2009 - 04:48 PM
Not a perfect solution to be sure, but fairly cheap compared to an overpass and easily done with right of ways in place I believe.
#11
Posted 19 December 2009 - 05:02 PM
#12
Posted 20 December 2009 - 09:34 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#13
Posted 20 December 2009 - 02:06 PM
#14
Posted 20 December 2009 - 03:24 PM
It still amazes we're going ahead with the McTavish intersection (where I've never seen more than a 12 car back-up during rush hour) when McKenzie should be our highest priority piece of road infrastructure. Well, I guess it doesn't amaze me (airport), but more irritates me.
The airport interchange is in the right riding. The McKenzie interchange is in an opposition riding - whose Member who crossed the floor of the HoC, at that!
#15
Posted 20 December 2009 - 08:10 PM
The cross traffic on Mackenzie isn't the problem, it's the left-turning traffic onto Mackenzie that significantly pads the wait for west bound traffic, and during rush hour you have a few vehicles turning left onto Admirals which delays eastbound traffic to some degree. This situation makes the intersection a perfect candidate for an interchange.
That is certainly true, like I said it is not a perfect solution, just one that is doable for very little money and would help speed things up somewhat. Rather than a full blown overpass system you could tunnel Admirals under the hiway to Mackenzie and have the existing left turn traffic exit right off the hiway and feed into the tunnel. That together with the two right turn lanes previously mentioned would do the trick.
But now we are talking more money.
#16
Posted 25 July 2010 - 09:40 PM
This is one of the main reasons that vehicles avoid the highway and cut through Esquimalt and Vic West to go over the two bridges into the downtown core. With the lane narrowing on Craigflower Road, this short cut will become even slower.
Has anyone determined the loss to businesses over the past two decades due to a lack of action on an interchange at Mckenzie and the Highway 1?
#17
Posted 25 July 2010 - 10:03 PM
#18
Posted 26 July 2010 - 06:22 AM
^ How would business be lost? Where would have gone?
No doubt the extra 2 minutes in traffic has prevented people clogged along this route from discovering the cure for cancer (rather than miss a .segment on Judge Judy).
#19
Posted 26 July 2010 - 06:56 AM
^ How would business be lost? Where would have gone?
The same way that Victora claims business would be lost if there were delays due to bridge work being done, or any other kind of roadwork. This intersection has been a torn in the sides of drivers for 20 years or more, and may have discouraged shoppers from travelling to the next municipality.
#20
Posted 26 July 2010 - 07:06 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users