I was pretty sure its a scam, but with Sebbery's post its definitely a scam
Victoria's residential rental market
#381
Posted 06 September 2018 - 06:52 AM
- lanforod likes this
#382
Posted 06 September 2018 - 07:22 AM
Perhaps not the best place to try, but looking for advice. Looking for a new place to rent in or close to town, I've been responding to ads on Craigslist and UsedVic. One in particular is a condo in the Duet in James Bay; the response surprised me:
I'm slightly put off by some of this - electronic payments, absentee landlady. Does this sound legit, or possibly a scam?
Rent by etransfer is not unusual as long as it is not requested up front or without proper documentation. I read the renting not increasing part as the rent would not change whether you wanted the place furnished or unfurnished not that it would not ever change period.
#383
Posted 06 September 2018 - 07:41 AM
Daughters boyfriend is looking for a rental in Munich while he does his Masters and came across the same style of ad over there. Its prolific
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=ovNHBEfTO_8
This video is a good laugh at these scams
#384
Posted 06 September 2018 - 07:48 AM
I'm slightly put off by some of this - electronic payments, absentee landlady. Does this sound legit, or possibly a scam?
It's the "too good to be true" part that makes it a scam. I spent my two years in Montreal sending eTransfers to a landlady who was living abroad. I think I met her once more than a year after moving in!
#385
Posted 06 September 2018 - 07:56 AM
- Mike K. likes this
#386
Posted 06 September 2018 - 10:57 AM
Anyone who wants money in advance of actually physically seeing the residence is a scam.
#387
Posted 06 September 2018 - 04:07 PM
You should definitely give them all your passwords and SIN number....
But my passwords ARE my SIN number...
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#388
Posted 06 September 2018 - 06:15 PM
The sad part is that even an obvious convoluted scam probably ensnares at least a few victims, considering the ultra tight rental market.
#389
Posted 24 September 2018 - 12:08 PM
B.C. Rental Housing Task Force recommends cutting annual rent increase cap
The recommendation is to abort the recently announced rental increase limit of 4.5% and drop it to just inflation - 2.5%. Appealing for current renters in the near term, but may cause landlords to price higher for incoming renters.
The move, recommended by the B.C. Rental Housing Task Force, would do away with the current calculation that allows landlords to charge their tenants annual inflationary increase plus an additional two per cent top-up.
Earlier this month, the Residential Tenancy Branch set the maximum allowable rent increase for 2019 at 4.5 per cent, the greatest jump since 2004. Coming a time when vacancy rates are at an all-time low and rents are already high, the news caused a stir on social media.
The task force is recommending to government that they change the maximum rent increase formula, from the current formula of inflation plus two per cent to inflation only (2.5 per cent in 2019).
To ensure landlords can afford to maintain their buildings, they will be able to apply for additional rent increases to cover the cost of work they have done, said Spencer Chandra-Herbert, task force chair and NDP MLA for Vancouver-West End.
Doesn't do a thing for the supply issue.
Edited by grantpalin, 24 September 2018 - 12:10 PM.
#390
Posted 24 September 2018 - 12:10 PM
The party’s desperation is starting to show. Artificially scaling back the rental increase will cause undue hardship down the road, as you say.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#391
Posted 24 September 2018 - 12:25 PM
it will also discourage new rental builds. maybe the increase should be pegged to the property tax increase then the province can simply blame the municipalities.
Edited by Victoria Watcher, 24 September 2018 - 12:25 PM.
#392
Posted 24 September 2018 - 12:59 PM
Even better, Vancouver has determined that their problem with affordable housing is that back in the day someone decided it should pay for itself. With that stupid rule off the table then housing prices can be whatever politicians decide they need to be with any shortfall being covered by the property taxes of those who own.
https://www.theglobe...rdable-housing/
#393
Posted 24 September 2018 - 01:00 PM
Good lord.
The party’s desperation is starting to show. Artificially scaling back the rental increase will cause undue hardship down the road, as you say.
It will result in people selling their buildings if they cannot make money. No problems, lots of people from Ontario and the mainland flush from selling their own houses would love to buy here.
#394
Posted 24 September 2018 - 01:10 PM
Seems unwise as the general rate of inflation likely bears little resemblance to the actual increase in costs faced by landlords who are providing the rentals. Landlords are not running charities or non-profits and if they can't get a reasonable rate of return will shift their portfolios to something that will give them a reasonable rate of return. This may even result in more rental buildings being stratified and sold off - which might be good for those who wish to buy a unit, but is not so good for those who wish to remain renters for whatever reason. .
#395
Posted 24 September 2018 - 01:15 PM
To ensure landlords can afford to maintain their buildings, they will be able to apply for additional rent increases to cover the cost of work they have done, said Spencer Chandra-Herbert, task force chair and NDP MLA for Vancouver-West End.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
- Matt R. likes this
#396
Posted 24 September 2018 - 01:17 PM
Seems unwise as the general rate of inflation likely bears little resemblance to the actual increase in costs faced by landlords who are providing the rentals. Landlords are not running charities or non-profits and if they can't get a reasonable rate of return will shift their portfolios to something that will give them a reasonable rate of return. This may even result in more rental buildings being stratified and sold off - which might be good for those who wish to buy a unit, but is not so good for those who wish to remain renters for whatever reason. .
Can't stratify an existing building without municipal approvals. If anything, will result in more demolitions.
#397
Posted 24 September 2018 - 02:42 PM
Can't stratify an existing building without municipal approvals. If anything, will result in more demolitions.
Or having "low margin" rental specialists like Robin Kimpton buying them up :-)
#398
Posted 24 September 2018 - 03:42 PM
Doesn't seem like anyone wants to think about the builders or the landlords bottom line, it's either NIMBYism, luxury dev rent seeking (ha) or poverty activism.
#399
Posted 24 September 2018 - 05:05 PM
You would be stupid to invest in rental real estate these days. ROI's are pathetic right now as it is, this just made them smaller
I think as a house owner I should demand the government limit my mortgage renewal increase to 2.5% as well. Fair is fair after all
#400
Posted 24 September 2018 - 05:09 PM
You would be stupid to invest in rental real estate these days. ROI's are pathetic right now as it is, this just made them smaller
I think as a house owner I should demand the government limit my mortgage renewal increase to 2.5% as well. Fair is fair after all
Imagine property taxes limited to inflation?
- Nparker and lanforod like this
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users