Where can Victoria put 16,000 more people?
#1
Posted 29 November 2007 - 10:16 PM
Southeast False Creek, before:
Southeast False Creek, after:
http://www.millenniumwater.com/
Rock Bay neighbourhood, before:
Rock Bay neighbourhood, after:
???
16 residential buildings, all between 6-16 stories with units 600-2500 sqft, on a total of 25 acres, LEED Gold (Press gallery aka community centre will be LEED Platinum) & 16,000 residents.
#2
Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:26 PM
#3
Posted 29 November 2007 - 11:34 PM
#4
Posted 30 November 2007 - 01:00 AM
Sheesh!
#5
Posted 30 November 2007 - 05:56 PM
#6
Posted 28 January 2010 - 10:05 PM
Resource recovery prospects dim for Greater Victoria's sewage project
Most existing buildings downtown, including the legislative precinct, would need higher water temperatures than a heat exchange and pump system could deliver economically, Gilbert Cote of Stantec Engineering told the committee.
But a small district heating system, similar to the one heating Vancouver’s athlete's village, could serve future buildings north of Pandora, where City of Victoria planners anticipate new development going.
That's a strong incentive for significant density in this area. Your grandma's 3:1 FSR ain't gonna cut it no more.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#7
Posted 29 January 2010 - 02:27 PM
#8
Posted 29 January 2010 - 02:32 PM
Higher density in Uplands. Rezone the whole place. Replace monster homes with mixed use.
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#9
Posted 29 January 2010 - 07:03 PM
#10
Posted 29 January 2010 - 07:22 PM
I think Rock Bay has the most potential of anywhere in Victoria, just need a few projects to kick it off..
Ah, you know that'll get bungled, it's gonna be a bunch of parks etc.
#11
Posted 31 January 2010 - 04:46 PM
#12
Posted 31 January 2010 - 05:40 PM
#13
Posted 31 January 2010 - 06:29 PM
I think just north of d/t is the next logical step for density.
#14
Posted 31 January 2010 - 06:33 PM
Going north of Downtown is a problem because this is industrial and commercial land. This land is needed for the city to allow for businesses to exist. This region has not been adding more industrial land, instead it has been converting it to residential.
Gonzales is already residential. The city should set a target for more affordable housing in that area before making new areas residential.
#15
Posted 31 January 2010 - 06:41 PM
Trouble is all the people you would have to put out of business to do that
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#16
Posted 31 January 2010 - 07:36 PM
While I would welcome more density in east Fairfield, if you break it down to the sum of its parts, there really isn't anywhere to develop. I can't think of any parking lots or brownfields worth targeting. There's the odd home or two will be redeveloped into something slightly more dense, but the neighbourhood is far too established for anyone to have the political will to tackle the behemoth of transforming it into a bunch of apartment buildings and townhomes.Western Fairfield has a lot of apartment buildings, it is the eastern end that is rather low in density.
Going north of Downtown is a problem because this is industrial and commercial land. This land is needed for the city to allow for businesses to exist. This region has not been adding more industrial land, instead it has been converting it to residential.
Gonzales is already residential. The city should set a target for more affordable housing in that area before making new areas residential.
Besides, rezoning some underused or unused areas of north downtown, such as this lot, would a much more realistic goal imo. And much less controversial.
#17
Posted 31 January 2010 - 10:30 PM
#18
Posted 31 January 2010 - 10:55 PM
#19
Posted 01 February 2010 - 07:21 AM
#20
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:09 AM
Hey, how about single-family homes on the Empress property?
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users