Jump to content

      



























Photo

CRD Bridges


  • Please log in to reply
76 replies to this topic

#21 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 03 May 2008 - 08:52 AM

Colwood votes to protect Esquimalt lagoon bridge
$110,000 needed to repair damage from winter storms
Bill Cleverley, Times Colonist
Published: Saturday, May 03, 2008


#22 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,531 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 04:33 PM

A Channel reports that the City of Victoria has requested an engineering assessment to ascertain decide whether the Johnson Street bridge's life can be extended or whether a replacement is required.

If a replacement is required it's price would be "tens of millions of dollars" and would result in a massive tax increase.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#23 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 04:47 PM

A Channel reports that the City of Victoria has requested an engineering assessment to ascertain decide whether it's life can be extended or whether a replacement is required.

If a replacement is required it's price would be "tens of millions of dollars" and would result in a massive tax increase.


Er, what are we/you talking about? The Colwood bridge?

#24 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,531 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 04:50 PM

Johnson Street bridge.

My bad.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#25 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 04:59 PM

Hmmm, I wonder if it's feasable to build a fixed bridge, I guess it would have to have quite a large hump(?). What's the tallest vessel that HAS to be able to get under it to go to the dry dock etc.? Obviously that would doom the train.

#26 UrbanRail

UrbanRail
  • Member
  • 2,114 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 10 June 2008 - 05:53 PM

If any replacement is required, then it needs to accomodate the railway (most likely one track with possible future space to have double track in the future), bike path and possibly 4 lanes of traffic. It currently has 3 lanes

#27 UrbanRail

UrbanRail
  • Member
  • 2,114 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 10 June 2008 - 05:54 PM

Hmmm, I wonder if it's feasable to build a fixed bridge, I guess it would have to have quite a large hump(?). What's the tallest vessel that HAS to be able to get under it to go to the dry dock etc.? Obviously that would doom the train.


Not necessarily, a modern lift bridge would work.

#28 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 05:56 PM

Not necessarily, a modern lift bridge would work.


What I'm getting at is forget about a mechanical lift-bridge, just build a fixed one with a hump.

#29 gumgum

gumgum
  • Member
  • 7,069 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 06:44 PM

there are other imeasurable costs associated with the removal of the J bridge. It's a local landmark.

#30 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,531 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 06:57 PM

This isn't tied directly to the bridge, but when the time comes to do replace/rebuild the thing the City should get rid of that silly curve on the Vic West side and streamline the traffic flow.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#31 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:08 PM

double-post

#32 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:15 PM

This isn't tied directly to the bridge, but when the time comes to do replace/rebuild the thing the City should get rid of that silly curve on the Vic West side and streamline the traffic flow.


With my VHF-HUMPBRIDGEivTM design, there will be no reason for it as the railway will be gone, so that leaves lots of high-elevation land area on that side. It'll have to remain 30km/h though to prevent airborne vehicles.

Here, I whipped up a 1/12 scale model in my back yard this afternoon:



#33 UrbanRail

UrbanRail
  • Member
  • 2,114 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:49 PM

well the railway wont be gone. I cant seeing any new bridge not being a lift type of bridge, judging from the types of boats being fixed at Ship Point. Also as was mentioned earlier, the bridge is a heritage land. Judging from aerial photos of the site, the approach roads on the downtown side would make it difficult to build a decent grade to make a hump bridge possible, but then again I am no engineer.

If the city wants to continue to promote the working harbour concept, then a lift bridge would be the best option.

#34 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:52 PM

How about a tunnel? It's low enough on the Vic West side.

#35 UrbanRail

UrbanRail
  • Member
  • 2,114 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 10 June 2008 - 07:59 PM

interesting idea, an approach to an tunnel on the vic west side may be easy, but the downtown side will pose a problem.

#36 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,531 posts

Posted 10 June 2008 - 09:02 PM

I predict a traffic calming measure will be undertaken and all traffic diverted to the Bay St. bridge.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#37 Rorschach

Rorschach

    Truth is my bitch!

  • Member
  • 758 posts

Posted 11 June 2008 - 04:45 AM

The plans for the Roundhouse development include a train station (and a brew pub). Could the bridge be retired and not replaced? I can see planners in Victoria thinking we could have a bridge that can't be used that must be just looked at because it's heritage.

#38 Bernard

Bernard
  • Member
  • 5,056 posts
  • LocationVictoria BC

Posted 11 June 2008 - 01:13 PM

I worry about the potential for very expensive costs involved with anything to do with the Johnson street bridge.

Meanwhile, there will come a time very soon where something will have to done about the Bay Street bridge. With all the new construction on near Bay and Tyee, there is a lot more traffic on the bridge. People living on the west side are commuting to other areas in the CRD, not just to Downtown or Selkirk.

Meanwhile the new offices there are drawing people from everyone else to commute to the neighbourhood for work.

The upshot is that the Bay Street bridge is becoming a bad bottleneck and will only get worse as time goes by.

Bay needs to made two lanes each way from Government all the way through to Esquimalt Road- this includes twinning the Bay Street bridge. Come to think of it, Bay should likely be made an arterial all the way through to Royal Jubilee.

This sort of a changed Bay will be able to divert more traffic away from the Johnson St bridge and into the downtown core.

Building the

#39 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,729 posts

Posted 11 June 2008 - 01:51 PM

...This sort of a changed Bay will be able to divert more traffic away from the Johnson St bridge and into the downtown core.

Building the


Good points Bernard, but did someone cut you off while you were composing the above?

#40 UrbanRail

UrbanRail
  • Member
  • 2,114 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 11 June 2008 - 06:54 PM

The plans for the Roundhouse development include a train station (and a brew pub). Could the bridge be retired and not replaced? I can see planners in Victoria thinking we could have a bridge that can't be used that must be just looked at because it's heritage.


I did talk to Geoff Young and this is what he sent me via email.

"Thanks for your thoughts, Aaron. I think many will agree with your views on Knott garden, shops, Library, the outdoor stage - but I do not think this council will go for station within the square. We had a bit of a discussion on these issues a few days ago. The best I could do was get agreement the line would come up Pandora (not sure which side) cross Govt and end either next to the Macpherson or on the other side of the street sharing the area now used for access to the hotel/restuarant. Do you have views on (1) which side of Pandora should be used? (2) do we actually need a double track station - certainly not planned for in early stages.
Geoff "



You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users