We're worried about speed limits but we're still allowing student drivers to drive ambulances?
How are ambulance drivers supposed to be trained? Exclusively on simulators?
Posted 09 July 2015 - 08:17 AM
We're worried about speed limits but we're still allowing student drivers to drive ambulances?
How are ambulance drivers supposed to be trained? Exclusively on simulators?
Lake Side Buoy - LEGO Nut - History Nerd - James Bay resident
Posted 13 September 2015 - 01:08 PM
A short film on how Vancouver never plays itself in films.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojm74VGsZBU
Posted 13 September 2015 - 01:18 PM
D'oh. Except for all of the shows that are filmed and set in Vancouver:
- Beachcombers
- Da Vinci's Inquest
- Continuum
- Neon Rider
- Edgemont
- Motive
...and I'm sure there are others. But I guess when it comes to "movies" then I don't think Vancouver has ever been "Vancouver." Or has it? I dunno.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 01:58 PM
Posted 13 September 2015 - 02:16 PM
Posted 13 September 2015 - 02:17 PM
Posted 13 September 2015 - 02:29 PM
^^btw VHF where is your Canadian pride?
I've got Canadian pride. But I understand the centre of the English-language entertainment universe is the US. That's why tens of thousands of Canadians work in the US in the entertainment industry and only a couple thousand at best US people work here in same. The US consumes so much of the world's entertainment - movies, TV, music, even live performances and sports, because they have a very strong economy, and consumers have high wages that can support spending on those things.
Consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers has predicted that global spending for media and entertainment will reach $2.2 trillion in 2017, compared with $1.6 trillion in 2012. The U.S. is expected to remain the largest media market, with spending increasing 4.8% annually to reach $632 billion in 2017, up from the nearly $500 billion spent last year.
http://www.latimes.c...0605-story.html
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:31 PM
I've got Canadian pride. But I understand the centre of the English-language entertainment universe is the US. That's why tens of thousands of Canadians work in the US in the entertainment industry and only a couple thousand at best US people work here in same. The US consumes so much of the world's entertainment - movies, TV, music, even live performances and sports, because they have a very strong economy, and consumers have high wages that can support spending on those things.
On an adjusted for GDP basis, I doubt the US spends much more than most 1st world countries. They have a strong economy and GDP, so of course the numbers look skewed that way.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:36 PM
^ So as a percentage of their income they spend the same as other 1st-worlders? I dunno, the figure I cited suggest they buy 29% of the entire world entertainment price ticket. That's not bad for 5% of the entire world population.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:39 PM
Oh, I suspect the US is still the biggest consumer as a percentage of their income, sure.
The problem with these numbers is that it doesn't take into account price variations as well.
But it won't look like 1/25ths of the world's population is spending almost 1/3rd of the world's media spending when you look at just the whole numbers... even though that is technically true, it doesn't show the full picture. Prices for media are much cheapr in China, for example.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:42 PM
^ Yes, that's probably true. Movies shown overseas generally bring in very little money (relatively), as I suspect when they are shown in India and China, they don't charge much to see them.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:46 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 10:17 PM
^ Yes, that's probably true. Movies shown overseas generally bring in very little money (relatively), as I suspect when they are shown in India and China, they don't charge much to see them.
You do know that most top Hollywood films now make more money on foreign box office, than domestic? And that's one reason why China has been figuring so prominently in most major Hollywood films these days? And it's why some films that "bombed" actually turn a profit and get sequels?
Jurassic World has brought in $1B in foreign box office (vs $650M in the US); Avengers: Age of Ultron has $943M foreign, to $460M domestic; Furious 7 brought in $350M domestic, versus a $1.1B foreign haul.
What slows Hollywood down is China having a blackout on Hollywood releases during the summer, as a protectionist effort to maintain it's local productions. But really, business-wise, the block-busters we get today are pretty much designed to make their profits overseas. The US/Canada market is becoming a secondary field.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 10:23 PM
You do know that most top Hollywood films now make more money on foreign box office, than domestic?
Ya, I see some of that for the very top films, but not for the rest. They do not make as much profit overseas though, their expenses (marketing, distribution, partners) is higher per dollar at the box office.
Posted 14 September 2015 - 09:52 AM
D'oh. Except for all of the shows that are filmed and set in Vancouver:
- Beachcombers
So Gibsons is now a suburb of Vancouver?
Lake Side Buoy - LEGO Nut - History Nerd - James Bay resident
Posted 16 January 2016 - 06:46 AM
Funding restored
Victoria councillors reversed a funding cut to the film commission and removed a $25,000 cap on Strategic Planning Grants.
The decision came at the urging of Coun. Jeremy Loveday and after councillors received more than 50 letters from businesses and residents supporting the commission.
Film commissioner Kathleen Gilbert said the funding cut would have been devastating and made little economic sense.
The film commission conservatively brought more than $18 million to the Greater Victoria economy last year — mostly in Victoria and Saanich — while operating on a budget of $175,000, she said.
- See more at: http://www.timescolo...h.l9Nq24Tr.dpuf
Posted 16 January 2016 - 07:48 AM
The film commission conservatively brought more than $18 million to the Greater Victoria economy last year
My only issue with that is that with no film commission there might have been a similar amount "brought in".
IMO the film commission ought to do a little bit of their own fundraising. They have an Oscar gala every year, and that's about it.
Posted 16 January 2016 - 07:53 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 16 January 2016 - 08:04 AM
Who funds the commision, and why the heck does the commission not charge a production levy?
I'm sure they will tell you that any type of a levy will discourage productions from coming here.
Look, for whatever reason, that particular industry is very good at getting money from taxpayers, mostly in the form of tax breaks. And you can see, when their funding was jeopardized here, they got 50 people to write letters. That's easier than raising $75,000 every year.
I suspect the lion's share of the commission's expenses is Gilbert's salary.
I don't know if any of the other municipalities help fund it. My guess is that Victoria is on the hook again. Look at Gracepoint, it did most of its filming in Sidney and Oak Bay, and major stars stayed in an Oak Bay hotel.
When I threw a free Gracepoint screening party, they called me to ask me not to, because they were doing one that cost $25 to go to. That's been my only contact with them.
Posted 16 January 2016 - 08:11 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users