Jump to content

      



























Photo

Some long gone greats: historical Victoria photos


  • Please log in to reply
722 replies to this topic

#81 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:23 PM

Blows my mind, what these two blocks of Broad Street used to look like. That ain't a small town, that's downtown:

a-03447_141.jpg

 

pic from BC Archives...

b-07545_141.jpg

 

pic from BC Archives...

i-20693_141.jpg

 

pic from BC Archives...


Edited by aastra, 17 March 2021 - 02:01 PM.


#82 Icebergalley

Icebergalley
  • Member
  • 596 posts

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:25 PM

Aastra..

Isn't the Granby Rubber Building located on Courtney and Government...

Look at the location relative to the Custom House.. Malahat Building? is at the foot of Courtney...

Isn't that now the site of the Harbour Centre?

edit... should have said Broughton.. the street that is terminated by the old Custom House..

#83 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:26 PM

I think that's Langley Street, no? The site of Harbour Square Mall is the point from which the pic was taken, I would think. So did Langley Street go all the way through?





Anybody recall what the Eaton's buildings look like in their last days? I recall them being monotone (painted over) and really depressing looking. Did they paint right over the brick?

#84 Icebergalley

Icebergalley
  • Member
  • 596 posts

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:38 PM

^ You're right I was one street down.... but the long side appears to be on edit - Broughton .... But then Langley Street has been cut off.... and now, it ends as the entrance to the parkade at the Harbour Centre.. (good shot needed for the grid... to show views into grid h32...)

Photo was perhaps taken from top of old post office or Belmont building?

Yes, Victoria of old had an urban central place look about it...

This is fun...

#85 Holden West

Holden West

    Va va voom!

  • Member
  • 9,058 posts

Posted 17 January 2007 - 10:54 PM

Anybody recall what the Eaton's buildings look like in their last days? I recall them being monotone (painted over) and really depressing looking. Did they paint right over the brick?


Eatons just weeks before demolition:


"Beaver, ahoy!""The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

#86 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 18 January 2007 - 11:52 AM

I was thinking of the Driard/Broad Street side.

#87 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:00 PM

Interesting tidbit in a very old Encyclopedia Britannica article about San Francisco:

The first public school was established in 1849. In 1855-1856 a disastrous commercial panic crippled the city; and in 1858, when at the height of the Fraser river gold-mine excitement it seemed as though Victoria, B.C., was to supplant San Francisco as the metropolis of the Pacific, realty values in the latter city dropped for a time fully a half in value.


http://www.zpub.com/sf/history/eb-sf.html

#88 Holden West

Holden West

    Va va voom!

  • Member
  • 9,058 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:19 PM

That's interesting. I was trying to find comparable census data for San Francisco and Victoria to compare their rivalry. I found S.F. was closing in on half a million after WW I, after Victoria's boom years.

In fact, it would be really interesting if someone could create a graph tracking population by decade for Victoria and its main coastal rivals; S.F., Portland, Seattle, Tacoma and Vancouver.
"Beaver, ahoy!""The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

#89 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:34 PM

Assuming the article is true (which isn't necessarily so, as evidenced by the error-filled listing for Vancouver in my Reader's Digest "Guide to Places of the World"), I think it offers more insight into the temporary crisis of confidence in San Francisco than it does into the real growth that was occurring in Victoria.

Victoria was hardly a town in 1860, whereas San Francisco was a little city comparable to the Victoria of the 1890s.

**

I'm always blurry on the historical populations, but I believe Vancouver and Victoria had almost identical populations just after the turn of the century, whereas by 1920 Vancouver's population was three or four times that of Victoria. I'd like to see official numbers if anybody can find them.

#90 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 08:34 PM

San Francisco in 1865:


#91 zoomer

zoomer
  • Member
  • 2,144 posts
  • LocationVictoria - Downtown

Posted 19 January 2007 - 10:32 PM

HW, the first google result for SF historical population states:

1980 678,974
1970 715,674
1960 740,316
1950 775,357
1940 634,536
1930 634,394
1920 506,676
1910 416,912
1900 342,782
1890 298,997
1880 233,959
1870 149,473
1860 56,802

http://www.abag.ca.g... ... nfran.html

kinda blows Victoria out of the water population wise. I also thought it was a bit closer back in the 1870s and 1880s, but not at all.

#92 m0nkyman

m0nkyman
  • Member
  • 729 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 11:24 PM

1870 149,473


The [url=http://www.vihistory.ca/content/census/1871/census1871.php?show=y:fd269]census of 1871[/url:fd269]for Victoria gave us a population of 3,630

I'd say we were a titch smaller.

#93 Holden West

Holden West

    Va va voom!

  • Member
  • 9,058 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 11:30 PM

Wow, even comparing the area we now call the CRD with downtown S.F. isn't even close.

Maybe the true rivalry was for the No. 2 coastal city.

That picture could easily be Victoria. Look at that architecture. Can we now safely discard the "little bit of old England" bit?
"Beaver, ahoy!""The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

#94 Scaper

Scaper
  • Member
  • 1,262 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 11:40 PM

When I first saw that photo I thought it was Victoria. hahaha

That hole idea of Victoria being like London etc......I just don't get, or see it. Especially the way the City has expanded out in Langford. It's a typical North American Sprawling City.

#95 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 12:42 PM



#96 Icebergalley

Icebergalley
  • Member
  • 596 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 02:42 PM

Aastra...

Wonderful grand selection of heritage photo's...

Thanks..

#97 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Guests

Posted 31 January 2007 - 11:50 AM

deleted by mod

#98 D.L.

D.L.
  • Member
  • 7,786 posts

Posted 31 January 2007 - 12:27 PM

titillating!

#99 aastra

aastra
  • Member
  • 20,734 posts

Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:23 AM

e-01713_141.jpg

 

pic from BC Archives...


Edited by aastra, 17 March 2021 - 02:03 PM.


#100 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 13,805 posts

Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:37 AM

Are we sure that is not the post office building on Yates? Where would this bilding have been? Rohani Building lot?

Visit my blog at: https://www.sidewalkingvictoria.com 

 

It has a whole new look!

 


You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users