I guess this should be in the TC thread but it's locked again for reasons that escape me.
Regarding the media coverage of the new Bay Centre tenant, it's interesting to observe how the news bubbled up from on online forum to the paper of record.
The TC reported the imminent arrival of Winners thusly:
Social media postings show blueprints indicating the new tenant will be Winners, a clothing and home accessories chain, but Hollstein is not discussing the name.
"Social media" in this instance meant Citified/Victoria Buzz/IheartVictoria (I'm not sure exactly) who picked up the news from this forum, based on an anonymous post featuring a blueprint screenshot (presumably genuine).
As the story trickled up the social media food chain it progressively gathered increasing veneers of respectability but at its core it's thinly-sourced. It looks genuine to me but without a second source it's hard to prove it's a done deal or merely some corporate spit-balling.
In this case, the TC should have been more forthcoming with the story's sourcing because the forum post is the story. It's fine to print rumour but it should be surrounded by more context.
The TC hates publicizing names of rivals and this is a habit that dates back many decades to when the Times and Colonist were friendly but fierce rivals and with multiple editions a day, the competition was intense and not an inch of ground was willfully given.
The good thing the TC did was an on-the-record denial from Bay Centre management.
Crediting rivals in cases where the competition's story is key is standard procedure at the big US outlets like the Washington Post, NYTimes, Axios ect.
The TC reported the imminent arrival of Winners thusly: