So I listened to someone today on CFAX about converting the E&N to multiuse (which means single use as in non motorized).
Now to be fair, they are proposing this be done north of Langford. This was not at all clear in the CFAX interview, especially when a caller promoted the use of the E&N for bike commuting to alleviate downtown CoV road rage and everyone agreed (as if someone will be biking into Victoria from Duncan each day).
My personal view is that the costs of using the E&N for commuting need to be compared to the current taxpayer subsidies per rider after administration and regional transit budgets are added for a single "all in" fee for a bus trip from Langford. That's what a train/LRT fare is judged against.
You also need to compare infrastructure costs that would be needed, such as dedicated bus lanes over the Malihat, or blasting a new highway though the other side of Goldstream, through the watershed.
For the rest of the E&N line....beyond Duncan....I don't know how feasible rail or a walk/bike path is. It would be analogous of a bike path from Vienna Austria to Budapest Hungary for crying out loud. How much will that cost to pave and maintain? Given our rainy weather, how much will it be used? Can it even be used for rail?