Secondary suites
#281
Posted 20 December 2022 - 10:43 AM
- Nparker likes this
#282
Posted 21 December 2022 - 07:37 AM
Statscan says 12% of lived in residential units are suites, or 590-units. Let’s say at the high end it’s 2 people per suite (likely lower), which works out to 1,180 people out of 12,235, or just under 10%. Even if it’s 3 people per suite, that’s still less than 15%.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#283
Posted 21 December 2022 - 07:55 AM
It’s not quite that high.
Statscan says 12% of lived in residential units are suites, or 590-units. Let’s say at the high end it’s 2 people per suite (likely lower), which works out to 1,180 people out of 12,235, or just under 10%. Even if it’s 3 people per suite, that’s still less than 15%.
StatsCan can't find you if you do not admit on the census you harbour an illegal suite.
#284
Posted 21 December 2022 - 08:05 AM
Like, are there adults in your house who are not your immediate family? Three census periods ago, someone identified that they lived in a suite, in the house you just bought. So those unrelated adults are likely living in that suite, whether you say it or not.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#285
Posted 22 December 2022 - 09:03 AM
It’s not quite that high.
Statscan says 12% of lived in residential units are suites, or 590-units. Let’s say at the high end it’s 2 people per suite (likely lower), which works out to 1,180 people out of 12,235, or just under 10%. Even if it’s 3 people per suite, that’s still less than 15%.
That math then, if you use it, says theres probably 5000 SFH or non-suite homes (some townhouses up there, IIRC) in North Saanich. Is that about right?
#286
Posted 22 December 2022 - 09:26 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#287
Posted 16 January 2023 - 11:06 AM
#288
Posted 16 January 2023 - 11:10 AM
...To start, 42 new full-time positions will prioritize housing that most urgently needs to be built...Once those positions are filled, the plan is to to increase the team to 203 positions
More bureaucracy always speeds up the process.
https://www.timescol...permits-6384624
- Matt R., dasmo and Victoria Watcher like this
#289
Posted 16 January 2023 - 11:20 AM
Spending 5 million more a year of our money to make our lives more affordable!
- Nparker and Victoria Watcher like this
#290
Posted 16 January 2023 - 11:20 AM
More bureaucracy always speeds up the process.
https://www.timescol...permits-6384624
Wrong link....
https://www.youtube....h?v=7xNnRBksvOU
- Nparker likes this
#291
Posted 16 January 2023 - 11:28 AM
When we moved from physical sign-off approvals to "e-approvals" in the BC Public Service, the amount of work for administrative staff at least doubled.
- Victoria Watcher likes this
#292
Posted 16 January 2023 - 12:33 PM
When we moved from physical sign-off approvals to "e-approvals" in the BC Public Service, the amount of work for administrative staff at least doubled.
A few years before I retired, an entirely separate electronic approvals tracking system was established that duplicated about 75% of the information that continued to be simultaneously entered into the long established correspondence tracking system (aka CLIFF). At least 2 full-time staff at the MoH were employed to monitor and maintain the e-approvals system.
- Victoria Watcher likes this
#293
Posted 10 April 2023 - 07:59 AM
In a report to an affordable housing committee meeting in 2019, Saanich staff estimated one in two of these houses already contained a suite. Within the same year, staff reported to council that only 195 (1.1 per cent) of homes in Saanich had a licensed suite.
And therein lies the problem. Without licensing, there is no assurance minimum building standards have been met in these suites risking the health and safety of both tenants and neighbours.
Faulty wiring, asbestos, mould, an inadequate number of exits, even the absence of smoke detectors could all exist. The absence of licensing also means the landlord is not required to provide on-site parking.
______________________
Further, by not licensing the homes with suites, municipal taxes are not being collected from the homeowner on the additional residents living on their property.
Yet these additional residents draw on Saanich’s municipal services, drive on our roads, may need police assistance and use the libraries.
Is it any wonder why Saanich’s taxes went up 6.67 per cent in 2022 and have risen another 6.8 per cent in 2023? If the provincial government needs to revise the laws surrounding how municipal taxes are determined, switching from a per property basis to a resident and tenant formula, now is the time to do it.
I’m confident municipalities will be involved in permitting any redeveloped properties where housing is replaced and therefore safety and taxing issues will be addressed.
https://www.timescol...housing-6829792
I think there are lots of holes in this letter. Is there any actual indicators that there is mold, wiring and other issues in houses with secondary suites?
The tax thing doesn't add up either.
Edited by Victoria Watcher, 10 April 2023 - 08:02 AM.
#294
Posted 10 April 2023 - 08:01 AM
...The absence of licensing also means the landlord is not required to provide on-site parking
Starlight was very nearly required not to provide (much) onsite parking.
#295
Posted 10 April 2023 - 09:37 AM
In a report to an affordable housing committee meeting in 2019, Saanich staff estimated one in two of these houses already contained a suite. Within the same year, staff reported to council that only 195 (1.1 per cent) of homes in Saanich had a licensed suite.
And therein lies the problem. Without licensing, there is no assurance minimum building standards have been met in these suites risking the health and safety of both tenants and neighbours.
Faulty wiring, asbestos, mould, an inadequate number of exits, even the absence of smoke detectors could all exist. The absence of licensing also means the landlord is not required to provide on-site parking.
______________________
Further, by not licensing the homes with suites, municipal taxes are not being collected from the homeowner on the additional residents living on their property.
Yet these additional residents draw on Saanich’s municipal services, drive on our roads, may need police assistance and use the libraries.
Is it any wonder why Saanich’s taxes went up 6.67 per cent in 2022 and have risen another 6.8 per cent in 2023? If the provincial government needs to revise the laws surrounding how municipal taxes are determined, switching from a per property basis to a resident and tenant formula, now is the time to do it.
I’m confident municipalities will be involved in permitting any redeveloped properties where housing is replaced and therefore safety and taxing issues will be addressed.
https://www.timescol...housing-6829792
I think there are lots of holes in this letter. Is there any actual indicators that there is mold, wiring and other issues in houses with secondary suites?
The tax thing doesn't add up either.
Watch for the words "progressive taxation" in the language of the more lefterly of the left populists we are suffering under here...
It's code words for the new left NDP to "tax and redistribute" for their version of fairness (called equity.) "Progressive taxation" looks for any way to redistribute, and the SF Homeowner is a favourite avatar for their hatred. Born, in part, out of envy, entitlement, and disappointment, I fear...
- Nparker and LJ like this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users