Wither Esquimalt?
#1
Posted 11 October 2006 - 09:46 AM
The first think that struck me was the God-awful state of the buildings along Esquimalt Road. It was never mistaken for Robson Street in my day, but the low-rent blight I saw was shocking. Little new construction and what was there had been allowed to deteriorate and crumble. The tidy little 7-Eleven of my youth was now West Bay Market--a nice name for a ramshackle dive straight out of South Central L.A. The Admirals Walk centre, which I remember had a popular Mr. Mike's steakhouse and neat magazine/newstand was falling apart, overgrown and practically deserted.
On the good side, The Esquimalt Plaza looked in good shape. I was amused to see the Fields store was still in its original 1970s location. Houses on other streets looked to be well cared for. The residences around Saxe Point Park in particular, looked as nice as anything you'd see in Oak Bay. I saw how some older apartments were beautifully maintained while others were allowed to become true slums.
I was really shocked to see the new Victor Brodeur school being built on the site of my old Junior High. It looks like a big factory or IKEA outlet. I think the decision to put the huge, window-less gym on a prominent outside corner was a mistake.
Overall, my impression was one of optimism. I look at the decay and see enormous future potential. Esquimalt needs to focus on developing its "downtown" with high-quality density as well as beautifying its entrance along Esquimalt Road.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#2
Posted 11 October 2006 - 10:07 AM
#3
Posted 11 October 2006 - 05:08 PM
It's funny how perspectives work. Esquimalt road if it were in Ontario, Quebec or any Atlantic province would be considered quite pituresque for the most part. But we compare it to what we have in other parts of the city and it seems run-down, and almost slummy.
Living here for a few years, I would have to agree with your perspective, but it wasn't my view on the area when I first moved here from Ontario.
#4
Posted 11 October 2006 - 05:27 PM
What disturbed me was that Esquimalt has gone downhill in places--sometimes quite dramatically--while other neighbourhoods like James Bay, Fernwood and Fairfield hold steady at worst or have gradually improved to a noticeable degree.
I lay the blame primarily at negligent and likely absent landlords and building owners.
It was good to see the Swallow's Landing project as well as the muni's efforts at beautification through street landscaping.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#5
Posted 11 October 2006 - 05:31 PM
#6
Posted 11 October 2006 - 07:34 PM
Never gotten along with it.
Ben
#7
Posted 11 October 2006 - 08:57 PM
#8
Posted 11 October 2006 - 09:17 PM
Kinda makes me thinks of Nanaimo.
#9
Posted 11 October 2006 - 10:41 PM
Victoria's answer to "the bad part of town" is Esquimalt. In reality the worst of what Esquimalt dishes out is matched, and in some cases surpassed, elsewhere in the core and throughout the capital. The whole notion of Esquimalt being a bad place or a place in decline is misplaced as the good stuff in that town more than makes up for the spots of bad.
That's my two cents.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#10
Posted 12 October 2006 - 12:15 AM
Time will tell.
#11
Posted 13 October 2006 - 08:47 AM
The tidy little 7-Eleven of my youth...
You must be 100 years old. I always thought that place was a dump. The worst 7-11 in town, by far.
I didn't know they were doing work at the old junior high school. I took a tour through Esquimalt a few months back. I must not have been paying attention.
The thing I noticed was the McDonald's with the outdoor seating right along the sidewalk. If you want a McDonald's that exhibits "comfortable urban presence" then the Esquimalt incarnation may be Victoria's best example.
#12
Posted 13 October 2006 - 10:43 PM
#13
Posted 21 October 2006 - 07:44 PM
#14
Posted 22 October 2006 - 08:28 PM
#15
Posted 23 October 2006 - 07:49 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#16
Posted 25 December 2006 - 10:38 AM
Much of the Saxe Point area, and a few other smaller residential pockets in the municipality, are duplex zoned and have been since the 1950s.
For the most part, though, only single- family homes were built on the large lots with families living in the neighbourhood for decades.
But with increasing land values in Saxe Point and people discovering Esquimalt, the neighbourhood is changing. More people are taking advantage of the zoning and applying to Esquimalt council for development permits to build duplexes. That is causing rifts between residents, duelling petitions and lawyer's letters to council and flurries of accusations between neighbours.
Hy Freedman says that land is "finite" and "there's demand for Esquimalt to increase its density," meaning both actual people and tax base.
What I find quite funny is that the neighbour who is leading the charge against the other neighbour who wants to develop his/her SFH into a duplex is a newcomer to the area. The article says that he moved to Esquimalt two years ago "and loves it." His argument against the duplex revolves around scale and character: it "doesn't fit in with the other houses," according to him.
"We are just trying to preserve the character and atmosphere of our neighbourhood and protect our property values and quality of life," [Peter] Mitchell said.
It definitely sounds like the script to the drama that's playing out all over town....
#17
Posted 26 December 2006 - 05:29 PM
Person sees Victoria
Person likes Victoria
Person Moves to Victoria
Person resists any change from Victoria that they first saw
Victoria changes
new person sees Victoria
repeat...
#18
Posted 26 December 2006 - 05:40 PM
With boomers moving to Victoria who expect certain lifestyle amenities and services, Victoria will have to change to provide them with that they're looking for! That includes the points I've mentioned above, and for many, high-density digs in the heart of the city.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#19
Posted 26 December 2006 - 05:49 PM
I know from experience in a previous workplace that about 1/6 - 1/8 of the houses along Rockland from Cook to St. Charles are divided into mostly legal and some illegal multiple suites. Imagine how good the quality of live could have been in that area. Now it just sucks, life around there.
#20
Posted 26 December 2006 - 06:51 PM
(PS to other readers: Rockland really is full of suites, duplexes, and conversions. According to city stats, somewhere in the vicinity of 67% of people in Rockland are renters.)
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users