House 'too big' for Uplands
#1
Posted 22 October 2009 - 12:46 PM
Oak Bay councillors question design of 12,300-square-foot home
By Kim Westad, Times Colonist October 22, 2009
http://www.timescolo...1497/story.html
Oak Bay councillors are balking at plans for a 12,300-square-foot house in the Uplands, saying it's just too big.
The design for the two-storey house planned for 2880 Beach Dr., which would likely cost $3 million to $4 million to build, includes six or seven bedrooms, a swimming pool and atrium and a second kitchen for frying.[...]
#2
Posted 22 October 2009 - 12:50 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#3
Posted 22 October 2009 - 01:06 PM
Coun. Nils Jensen asked if any thought had gone to green features, such as solar heating.
Jeez!!! Is that all he can think about. This guy is up there with Richard Stanwick!!! Bunch of Puritans!
It's 3/4 of an acre, thats a good size lot and can hold a lot of house no problem. And anyway what difference does it make if each bedroom has an ensuite and a living room. They should only be concerned with the exterior and ensuring it is appropriate for the area.
I wonder what Nils would say if I was to design my dream home with a 6 car garage?
#4
Posted 22 October 2009 - 01:54 PM
#5
Posted 22 October 2009 - 02:08 PM
House 'too big' for Uplands
Oak Bay councillors question design of 12,300-square-foot home
By Kim Westad, Times Colonist October 22, 2009
http://www.timescolo...1497/story.html
Oak Bay councillors are balking at plans for a 12,300-square-foot house in the Uplands, saying it's just too big.
The design for the two-storey house planned for 2880 Beach Dr., which would likely cost $3 million to $4 million to build, includes six or seven bedrooms, a swimming pool and atrium and a second kitchen for frying.[...]
Isn't this the same council that approved that ridiculous monstrosity in the 200 block of King George Terrace?
#6
Posted 22 October 2009 - 03:13 PM
They are a confused bunch.
On one hand they proclaim they want OB to be a 'green leader' then they clear out a flower bed to add two more parking spots at the library.
They close off OB Ave for a monthly "farmer's market" half of which is people selling god's eyes left over from the 60s and handbags made in China.
Feh.
#7
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:19 PM
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#8
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:30 PM
This is what a 12,000 sq. ft. house can look like.
Captain Vague comes through again! Yeah, that's a big house, so what's your point?
Do the people serving on Oak Bay Council really not know that there are already huge mansions in the Uplands? Are they really that out of touch? Sweet Pea weighs in at 16,000 sq.ft and Riffington, Eagles Nest, Robinwood, the house opposite Robinwood, and the house next door to Sweet Pea must all be at least 10,000 sq.ft.
#9
Posted 22 October 2009 - 05:56 PM
#10
Posted 22 October 2009 - 06:02 PM
I thought it was interesting that Alan Lowe is its architect. Been wondering what he's up to these days.
Proof that this is purely political
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#11
Posted 22 October 2009 - 06:56 PM
#12
Posted 22 October 2009 - 07:05 PM
#13
Posted 22 October 2009 - 07:28 PM
Captain Vague comes through again! Yeah, that's a big house, so what's your point?
Do the people serving on Oak Bay Council really not know that there are already huge mansions in the Uplands? Are they really that out of touch? Sweet Pea weighs in at 16,000 sq.ft and Riffington, Eagles Nest, Robinwood, the house opposite Robinwood, and the house next door to Sweet Pea must all be at least 10,000 sq.ft.
i don't think any of those houses are on 3/4 acre though. sweetpea for example is on 2.5 iirc.
#14
Posted 22 October 2009 - 07:46 PM
I don't know. Maybe he was trying to be helpful and give people a point of reference?Captain Vague comes through again! Yeah, that's a big house, so what's your point?
Personally I think that if this thing wasn't so hideous*, I doubt as many would have much of a problem with it.
*Personal opinion
#15
Posted 22 October 2009 - 07:55 PM
Captain Vague comes through again! Yeah, that's a big house, so what's your point?
The drawings didn't seem to be with the story when I clicked the TC link today. I was simply curious about what a 12,000 sq. ft. home actually looked like. I guessed others might be too. That's all.
Mods, you can move this post into the "Phil McCavity Gets Things Explained To Him" thread.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#16
Posted 22 October 2009 - 08:44 PM
i don't think any of those houses are on 3/4 acre though. sweetpea for example is on 2.5 iirc.
Riffington and Eagle's Nest may be more than 3/4 acre. I seem to think Riffington is maybe 2.5 (1ha).
I think Uplands was less sacred when they were built and up to fairly recently. There are still a lot of less-than-heritage-quality post war junkers.
#17
Posted 22 October 2009 - 08:45 PM
It kind of looks like rjag's six-car garage...
This is a 6 car garage and I only wish it was mine!!!!
#18
Posted 23 October 2009 - 04:19 AM
I don't know. Maybe he was trying to be helpful and give people a point of reference?
Personally I think that if this thing wasn't so hideous*, I doubt as many would have much of a problem with it.
*Personal opinion
The only problem is, he was assuming we were all ignorant of what a 12,000 sq.ft. house looks like but I have seen countless houses of similar dimensions inside and out. I'll bet others here have seen some really big houses too. Just because he hasn't doesn't mean we are all ignorant.
The thing I will never understand is why is it anybody's business how big someone else's house is or how big the size of their lot is? It seems to me that the only person that this should concern is the homeowners themselves. People like Nils Jensen just make me shake my head too. I'll tell you what Nils, if you're so concerned with green features, build them all into your house.
I think Uplands was less sacred when they were built and up to fairly recently.
#19
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:33 AM
The thing I will never understand is why is it anybody's business how big someone else's house is or how big the size of their lot is? It seems to me that the only person that this should concern is the homeowners themselves.
I think folks are concerned that a home that is in poor taste or out of character for their neighborhood can lower their property values. That's a legit concern in my book, but one that can easily by handled by covenants and other private arrangements. The problems arise when those who don't have an immediate and substantial concern get an inordinate amount of say.
In this case, I would think there might be half a dozen people directly affected, yet any resident in Oak Bay that wants to get involved gets attention. For the elected, it's a simple matter of counting votes. If denial will get more voter support than approval, then it's thumbs down. This is one of the reasons libertarians oppose zoning and favor land management by non-state entities.
#20
Posted 23 October 2009 - 09:43 AM
The only problem is, he was assuming we were all ignorant of what a 12,000 sq.ft. house looks like but I have seen countless houses of similar dimensions inside and out. I'll bet others here have seen some really big houses too. Just because he hasn't doesn't mean we are all ignorant.
I think this misunderstanding is a natural byproduct of having contributors from across the intelligence spectrum interacting on a public forum. My apologies.
In the future I will try to be smarter.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users