Voter apathy
#1
Posted 08 November 2009 - 06:39 PM
Honouring Canada's veterans, one vote at a time
Steven Hurdle, VibrantVictoria.ca
http://vibrantvictoria.ca/?p=1329
Remembrance Day is a time to remember the horrors of war, and also a time to reflect on the freedoms that were secured for us in those times of strife. A total of 1.8 million Canadian soldiers served in the two world wars, and thousands more in more recent conflicts, so many of us have personal connections to them.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#2
Posted 08 November 2009 - 09:57 PM
Some local politicians, and advisors, have used the expectation of voter apathy and a lack of organized resistance, to push through bylaws and approve developments which were against general consensus - although that was discovered after the fact when problems were highlighted.
There is noted frustration on both sides. Municipal politicians especially look for input, but find themselves dealing with set interest groups with one agenda, or apathy.
This is where the frank exchange of ideas leading to consensus fails in the normative age, and must change in a Web 2.0 world.
#3
Posted 08 November 2009 - 10:01 PM
If many of us subscribe to the mantra that those who don't vote shouldn't complain, why do hoards of people come out to protests or voice opposition to political agendas, yet fail to actually make an effort to vote during elections? Students are particularly guilty of this. They organize for protests in sizable numbers but they also represent one of the lowest subsets of voters during municipal or provincial/federal elections.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#4
Posted 08 November 2009 - 10:25 PM
Each elector gets a 10-digit number in the mail before the election, they input that code and make their vote. You can still have normal polls too.
Even the US uses a lot of regular mail-in votes, that doesn't seem to be a problem.
#5
Posted 08 November 2009 - 10:28 PM
Why can't we test out some internet voting, even if we just try it first on a school board election, then municipal?
Agreed - and ensure everyone knows in advance it is a test. Provide independent oversight and that might allow for responsible engagement.
#6
Posted 08 November 2009 - 10:29 PM
I wonder if at the end of the day any well-meaning workshop is going to galvanize any but the already galvanized. One of the glossy brochure pages for the engagement workshop says "Join us for a conversation about recent Victoria consultations."
(see here.)
Oh boy, I can hardly wait. (Not.)
Can anyone think of anything more boring?
I'm not sure what the answer is to getting people engaged and turned out. But another workshop to workshop the results of previous workshops...? Somehow I doubt that's going to rock anyone's world.
#7
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:00 AM
In the local elections people do not vote because they have no idea who the candidates are. Small towns have higher turn outs because people know the candidates. Very few people are willing to go to the polls if they do not feel they know enough.
In the provincial elections only about 1/4 of the ridings are competitive. In most of them it does not matter if you vote or not because your vote makes no difference to the outcome. A lot of people choose not to vote because they see little among the choices on the ballot to choose from.
In federal and provincial elections only about 1/3 of people vote in every election. Almost half the people that vote in one election will not vote in the next one.
#8
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:07 AM
I do not think internet voting will dramatically increase voter turn out. The main problems are that people are unwilling to vote if they do not feel well informed enough or if they think their vote will not matter in the election.
In the local elections people do not vote because they have no idea who the candidates are. Small towns have higher turn outs because people know the candidates. Very few people are willing to go to the polls if they do not feel they know enough.
In the provincial elections only about 1/4 of the ridings are competitive. In most of them it does not matter if you vote or not because your vote makes no difference to the outcome. A lot of people choose not to vote because they see little among the choices on the ballot to choose from.
In federal and provincial elections only about 1/3 of people vote in every election. Almost half the people that vote in one election will not vote in the next one.
Rightly or wrongly, I believe I could get my 25 co-workers to vote if they could do it easily. I go from cubicle to cubicle and urge them to take 3 minutes and stand behind them until they do it. On the other hand, getting even 5 of my non-voting friends to hoof it to the polls is pretty much impossible.
#9
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:29 AM
Rightly or wrongly, I believe I could get my 25 co-workers to vote if they could do it easily. I go from cubicle to cubicle and urge them to take 3 minutes and stand behind them until they do it. On the other hand, getting even 5 of my non-voting friends to hoof it to the polls is pretty much impossible.
Which is in a nutshell the danger with internet voting. If you were the boss you could also tell your 25 employees how you would like them to vote, and stand behind them until they do it. Even if you weren't so obvious, you could quite easily monitor how they vote.
#10
Posted 09 November 2009 - 10:45 AM
#11
Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:18 AM
#12
Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:21 AM
I almost always vote, but I'm usually apathetic about local elections because the people I vote for are rarely elected. It doesn't stop me from going, but it usually feels like a chore because I know my voice won't be heard.
Welcome to the club. I go vote faithfully every Federal election and my candidate has lost all 7 times. But I still like going.
#13
Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:50 AM
In the 2001 election in BC there was a huge number of NDP supporters that did not vote because they did not like the NDP and would not vote for anyone else. This happens all the time. There is some research that has been done on this at UBC
#14
Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:57 AM
I am not convinced you could get 25 people to vote in your office that are not voting at the moment. I have worked on all manner of political campaigns since the early 1980s. I have also run for office three times (and lost three times). People taking voting seriously and are not willing to vote if they do not know enough about the candidates or if there is no one they want to vote for.
I know a lot of people that were influenced very much so by their parents to vote a cetain way when they were younger. I think that might work at the job, being influenced by others you work with.
#15
Posted 09 November 2009 - 12:15 PM
I first voted behind a curtain in someone's basement.
#16
Posted 09 November 2009 - 12:27 PM
I almost always vote, but I'm usually apathetic about local elections because the people I vote for are rarely elected. It doesn't stop me from going, but it usually feels like a chore because I know my voice won't be heard.
I think voting, even if your party has little chance, is good for your views being heard. First, if others with your views see that people are voting for your candidate, they may be more likely to in the future. Second, all parties analyze every vote and adjust their campaigns to try to capture some of those voters. I don't think a vote for the Green Party is particularly wasted because it encourages the other parties to be more green. Will they be as green as the Green Party? Probably not, but your "wasted" vote may influence the discourse.
#17
Posted 09 November 2009 - 03:44 PM
...but I couldn't be bothered!
#18
Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:11 PM
#19
Posted 22 November 2009 - 12:12 AM
In the last year the world has seen trillions of dollars evaporate. As taxpayers we have worked too hard for this to have happened. But it has.
It is time for Canadians to show more backbone. We are not whimps.
Have a say...get out and vote.
#20
Posted 06 June 2010 - 07:47 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users