You are missing the point.
No question there are people in need of affordable housing. My criticism was that taking an apartment that the Wing claims has a market price of $1050 a month and then reducing it to $900 a month is not going to make any difference to people on welfare who still cannot afford $900.
In my opinion is it not a fair trade for the $810K the taxpayer is going to cough up.
Maybe I have missed something here. Where does the figure of $900 a month come from? I thought this was going to be subsidized.
I'll have to go back and reread the article.