Rethinking Esquimalt's Town Centre
#21
Posted 23 June 2007 - 09:52 AM
Some lines in that letter are a little premature since the public hearing still hasn't happened yet.
#22
Posted 23 June 2007 - 10:22 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#23
Posted 23 June 2007 - 11:29 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#24
Posted 23 June 2007 - 03:09 PM
EDIT: Derf just posted the proposal in the Core section -- hadn't seen that before composing this reply. Still, I'd like the paper to have some article on this, vs just publishing the letter...
#25
Posted 23 October 2007 - 02:06 PM
[url=http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=c1f7bf95-d186-4455-a63f-dfb730032d74&k=35278:ae6f2]Esquimalt to overhaul town centre with stores, condos[/url:ae6f2]
Kim Westad, Times Colonist
Published: Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Esquimalt council and residents got a glimpse last night into what their town could look like if a village core goes ahead.
Although no actual plans were put forward -- that will happen in the spring -- the Vancouver firm that will do that presented council with the results of months of public input, and a few suggestions.
(...)
Hotson's architecture firm has been hired by the municipality to come up with an Esquimalt village core plan incorporating publicly owned land and buildings. That includes everything from the old municipal hall to a patchwork of small lots scattered along and just off Esquimalt Road. Rather than have them develop individually, the town wants an integrated, long-term plan to try to create more of a core.
(...)
...Hotson, the architect behind Granville Island, emphasized that nothing has yet been decided, he was clear that increased residential development on Esquimalt Road is essential.
He sees buildings with retail on the main floor, with residential above. That mixed-used development is a way to increase density in a community with little available land and also creates a lively ambience. With density and ambience come successful retailers.
"The more warm bodies that can walk to the core, the better off it will be for sustainability," Hotson said. "The core is not the greatest place right now."
An economic analyst working with Hotson said the "time is right and the time is now for further economic investment and growth in the village core."
The municipality should also have a clear way of "extracting money from developers" that can be put to use for other needs in the municipality, Hotson said. Incentives, such as density, could also be offered to private owners of land adjacent to publicly owned land.
(...)
Although residents agree on some things for their community, there's also a lot of division, perhaps reflective of the changing demographics. Esquimalt has families who have lived there for generations, but also has a growing community of newcomers, drawn to the lower house prices, recreation and proximity to Victoria and the water.
Some people said they wanted more "upscale" shops, while others said "please do not aim for high-end shops or trendy urban glitz."
#26
Posted 23 October 2007 - 02:33 PM
Esquimalt council and residents got a glimpse last night into what their town could look like if a village core goes ahead.
Esquimalt has families who have lived there for generations, but also has a growing community of newcomers, drawn to the lower house prices, recreation and proximity to Victoria and the water.
Good gravy. You'd think Esquimalt was ten miles past Sooke, the way they talk. The proximity to Victoria is zero. It IS Victoria.
#27
Posted 23 October 2007 - 03:23 PM
#28
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:27 PM
Esquimalt has families who have lived there for generations, but also has a growing community of newcomers...
Families who have lived there for generations? In Esquimalt? Within a few blocks of one another? Seriously, how many such families could there possibly be? I'm sure there are a few, but why on earth would you feature such an exceptional (and tiny) group in your summary of the local demographics?
So we've got ancient lineages and we've got fresh-faced newcomers...but what about everybody else? What about all the people who've moved in and out over the decades, or who've rented an apartment for a few months? News flash: renting an apartment in Esquimalt isn't some new fad.
Here's a better question: Why does Esquimalt get such bizarre consideration by the local media? It's an urban municipality in the heart of Victoria! It's a city neighbourhood. Drives me crazy.
#29
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:38 PM
http://www.globalairphotos.com/large/BC/Esquimalt/All/2007/025/1
#30
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:40 PM
#31
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:47 PM
"This is a 100-year plan," Hotson said. "You're in this for the long haul."
Right. This is a tender project. Wouldn't want to rush it. If spiffying up Esquimalt Road takes umpteen years, it'll be worth it to do it right.
The municipality itself isn't even a hundred years old.
Check out "Esquimalt Today" from Wikipedia:
Esquimalt's small town atmosphere and close proximity to urban services and amenities combined with its progressive outlook is attracting new commercial, residential and industrial development that complement its many existing amenities including beautiful parks and beaches, scenic waterfront walkways, modern recreational facilities, heritage buildings, schools, library and commercial services. Past news articles have tended to over-emphasize problems with violence, drugs and alcohol while ignoring the community's more positive attributes. Esquimalt is a city of diverse residential neighbourhoods accommodating renters and home owners of varying ages and income levels. With its close proximity to Victoria (2 km west of downtown) Esquimalt is becoming a more desirable location for families to relocate.
#32
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:54 PM
Give me a break.
#33
Posted 23 October 2007 - 08:24 PM
I like how you pounce on this quote:
That one really stuck in my craw, too. A one-hundred-year plan in 2007? What an odd notion. One would think that the whole point of "planning" today would be not to cast things in iron/ engrave them in stone, but to be innovative, agile, and responsive."This is a 100-year plan," Hotson said. "You're in this for the long haul."
One hundred years. What a laugh.
I wish we had a decent newspaper in Victoria that really reported on these sorts of things, instead of giving us pablum.
#34
Posted 24 October 2007 - 10:36 AM
It didn't take much more than 100 years to build all of Greater Victoria (including Esquimalt). Greater Vancouver took even less time.
#35
Posted 24 October 2007 - 10:54 AM
#36
Posted 25 October 2007 - 12:50 PM
I think aastra's question deserves more consideration.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#37
Posted 25 October 2007 - 02:09 PM
I wonder if anyone from Victoria has ever dated anyone from Esquimalt?
Here.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#38
Posted 25 October 2007 - 02:40 PM
#39
Posted 26 October 2007 - 01:58 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#40
Posted 26 October 2007 - 02:34 PM
In my defense, I'm originally from Bay Street East, so you can hardly blame me for my ignorance. I know as little about Vic West West as I do about South Shelbourne. Totally different worlds.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users