Posted 19 August 2010 - 12:56 AM
If I were running I would not be promising to 'fix' the 900 block with a 'law and order' solution. It would be good though to have a dialogue on this whole tough on crime fantasy, it is has badly blinded too many people here and across the country.
I don't imagine I'd win an election because I would not be able to promise to 'fix' this problem. I'd be telling you the truth, as would be the case with any candidate with the guts to admit it.
I think it's too easy for a politician to say that the solution is for all levels of government to work together. That is the solution of course, but is as likely to happen as all militarized nations to put down their weapons and promise to live in peace with each other forever. We need to either get planning and acting to bring the three levels of government together on this, or we need to take new approaches, and not just quick fixes or imaginary solutions such as more police.
A robust harm reduction strategy including safe consumption sites, accessible and well-funded treatment options (emphasis on options), higher wages, higher income assistance rates, better working conditions, better healthcare and education, more options for healthcare, education, income assistance, etc, these are all critical to ending this problem. Most of this is quite beyond the ability of a city councillor to promise, so if anyone promises to fix the problem, I would distrust them immediately. That's just saying what you need to say to get elected, and no one who has a grasp of the issue and the roles and responsibility of the various levels of government can take such a claim seriously.
The 'fix' as I see it, is like stabilizing a patient while waiting for an ambulance that might never come. Obviously we need and want something to be done. Making statements that all three levels of government should be working together or that we should have a national housing policy or a poverty reductions strategy or whatever is not what we are expecting from anyone on council right now as the 'fix'.
It starts with having a democratic approach where effort is made to bring all of the stakeholders together to work out solutions, and to communicate the realities of the situation to the public in a way that cuts through the bs. Things that haven't been happening on the 900 block issue.
I don't expect a candidate to have all the answers for all the issues. What's important is that we have a council that can work together to get things done, with council members who are well informed and constantly processing that serious amount of information required of the job, making decisions that skillfully balances the needs and wants of the community and can skillfully determine what is going to work to keep this city safe, welcoming, and solvent. (Infrastructure deficit, anyone?)
Personally, a candidates 'position' is almost irrelevant to me in terms of whether I think they are a fit for this job. Once you get in that chair you will have a lot of information coming at you, and you must make your decisions based on weighing all the factors, not on what you believe is right.
I don't expect everyone on council to all think alike on issues, but another important factor is a respectful, team oriented approach to getting things done, to working together to come up with ways to make lemonade out of bathwater, not just butting heads and trying to push forward a personal agenda. I don't expect everyone to be on the same page, but if that respect is not there, if the atmosphere is too venomous, it just doesn't work.
I would vote for someone who I disagreed with on certain issues if I felt they were skilled at the actual job, and not just the politics of it.