"Our main thing is our rural quality of life is at stake," said Lena Lee of Friends of the Saanich Inlet, which is opposed to the development.
"We are a rural community here. We don't want a bustling city here," said Lee, who lives on a 0.2-hectare lot north of the Bamberton site.
[South Cowichan Valley] Bamberton | 5,000 homes | On-hold
#21
Posted 27 October 2009 - 05:38 PM
#22
Posted 27 October 2009 - 06:51 PM
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#23
Posted 27 October 2009 - 07:01 PM
I wonder where this group was when Three Point was cleaning up the toxins that were leaking into their aquifer?
very good point
#24
Posted 27 October 2009 - 07:46 PM
#25
Posted 27 October 2009 - 07:59 PM
I wonder where this group was when Three Point was cleaning up the toxins that were leaking into their aquifer?
I highly doubt there was much contamination of the groundwater resources outside of the site, being so close to the elevation of the inlet and in the central area of the property. The effects on the marine ecosystem of the inlet were probably more adversely affected if at all.
#26
Posted 27 October 2009 - 08:16 PM
From this map, there's a planned location for a school. I wonder, in light of all of the recent cuts, and school closures, who is going to pay to build and operate a school? Or is it just a feel-good to help the master corporate plan along?
#27
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:10 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#28
Posted 27 October 2009 - 09:50 PM
The physical proctors would have high social skills and be trained to teach the students the pleasure of comfortable interaction, study habits, eating habits, respect towards others, etc. This part of the training might have more flexible age parameters.
ESL students would be given appropriate classes and attention depending on the need.
This would reduce the cost of education big time, and would standardize the level of education for most students, but allow for specialized learning for those that require it.
The sooner that we quit performing educational strategies the same way we did at the turn of the last century the better. The problem will be with the teachers unions. Some teachers might like the idea, but the left wing labour organizers will not. To them it is all about the contract, not about a cost effective delivery of high quality education.
#29
Posted 28 October 2009 - 10:07 AM
http://www.bamberton...n-Site-Plan.pdf
From this map, there's a planned location for a school. I wonder, in light of all of the recent cuts, and school closures, who is going to pay to build and operate a school? Or is it just a feel-good to help the master corporate plan along?
The school districts are making cuts as they have fewer students, but when the numbers rise they are building schools or if there is a demand in a new neighbourhood. The provincial government has a separate capital fund to build schools so building a new school is not an expense for the school district.
On a per capita basis BC school districts are well funded, what I always wonder is why the school boards seem to be unable to manage their money well and why they seem uninterested in developing any fundraising campaigns like the universities do
#30
Posted 28 October 2009 - 11:57 AM
On a per capita basis BC school districts are well funded, what I always wonder is why the school boards seem to be unable to manage their money well and why they seem uninterested in developing any fundraising campaigns like the universities do
Or hospitals etc.
#31
Posted 28 October 2009 - 03:42 PM
#32
Posted 28 October 2009 - 06:17 PM
#33
Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:59 AM
5000 new homes. 5000 more cars on the Malahat. Oh....joy.
That is unlikely, the number of cars on the Malahat from these 5000 houses is likely to be only 1500 to 2000 by the end of the build out in 30 years if our work patterns remain like they are today.
#34
Posted 12 November 2009 - 10:32 AM
5000 new homes. 5000 more cars on the Malahat. Oh....joy.
Yeah see that's part of the problem. Creating a strain on the current system doesn't really affect the developer. It doesn't affect his bottom line because the issue doesn't arise until completion of sales.
#35
Posted 12 November 2009 - 12:12 PM
Yeah see that's part of the problem. Creating a strain on the current system doesn't really affect the developer. It doesn't affect his bottom line because the issue doesn't arise until completion of sales.
How is that the Developers problem anyhow? Its up to the regional government to ensure that proper infrastructure is built to keep up with the pace of growth and development, not a private business. The local governments around the Malahat have really dropped the ball in terms of looking at expansion or traffic flow solutions for the region, as it is inevitable the continued growth north of the "hat" will occur well into the future. Don't blame a responsible developer who is reclaiming a former Concrete Plant and creating a sustainable and livable community on a space that is otherwise wasted and an eyesore.
#36
Posted 12 November 2009 - 06:46 PM
#37
Posted 12 November 2009 - 07:10 PM
#38
Posted 12 November 2009 - 08:10 PM
#39
Posted 16 November 2009 - 01:43 PM
#40
Posted 16 November 2009 - 01:58 PM
I'm curious, I wonder if any of the posters/respondents to this thread (besides Becky) are investors in this project via the developer's company or from the surrounding lands?
I've got a cool $2M riding on this baby.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users