...Will more high-rises in Victoria help with costs? It’s not lack of housing that is the problem. It is the demand that comes from people outside the region who are willing to pay more to live here.
You know, because nobody who already lives in a place has ever demonstrated any willingness to pay more to remain in that place, by upgrading his/her situation. Never happens. For goodness sake, we've consumed ~70 years of media coverage re: the housing crisis. The point has been made over and over again, every which way, that Victoria is permanently situated at the top of the list re: Canada's toughest housing markets (typically #1 or #2, generation after generation... it's not a fad, it's not some new thing).
Methinks many people are still going to extreme lengths to deny the obvious. If options are limited and if people are willing to pay then the options will inevitably be pricey.
Replacing Victoria’s old homes with high-density high-rise condos won’t make housing cheaper...
It's so sad, all of those old homes in the HBC parkade that were replaced with high-density highrise condos, or all of those old homes on the Coronet parking lot that were replaced with highrise condos, or all of those old homes on the Songhees/Dockside Green industrial brownfields that were replaced with highrise condos, or all of those old homes on the parking lots of south downtown that were replaced with highrise condos, etc. How many more old homes will be lost when the London Drugs complex is redeveloped, or when the Pluto's lot is redeveloped, or when the Cook Street car dealerships are redeveloped, etc.?
Seriously, if people make a fuss about high-density highrise condos replacing old homes when such is only occurring in their imaginations, I can't imagine how upset they'd be if it were really happening.
So much faux-environmentalism in those TC letters. The replacement of downtown surface parking lots with apartments should make any legitimate environmentalist jump for joy.
Edited by aastra, 06 February 2020 - 10:41 AM.