Jump to content

      













Photo

Local road and highway development, conditions


  • Please log in to reply
3254 replies to this topic

#3241 Linear Thinker

Linear Thinker
  • Member
  • 469 posts
  • LocationWork Downtown, Live in E-Town

Posted 15 May 2019 - 11:26 AM

Text of the 40k version of a similar motion from City of Victoria that was not endorsed at the UBCM in 2013.

WHEREAS local governments are concerned about resident safety on municipal streets, and lower vehicle speeds reduce the severity of injuries to pedestrians in vehicle/pedestrian collisions;

AND WHEREAS consistent province-wide speed limits promote driver awareness and ease enforcement between municipalities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM request the Province of British Columbia to amend the Motor Vehicle Act to limit the default speed limit on a highway in a municipality to 40 km/h and allocate implementation funds to assist municipalities in installing signage for higher speeds where appropriate.

 

There is arguably a more sympathetic provincial government in place now, but the UBCM would still need to endorse it.

Link to UBCM Resolution search (use speed).

Interesting the number of times similar motions have been initiated. The results also include provincial/federal responses if the motion was approved at UBCM.

 

<snip>

Vancouver will also be asking the Union of BC Municipalities to lobby the Province for amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act to lower the default speed to 30 km/h, and allow municipalities to increase the default speed through local bylaws and signage.


Edited by Linear Thinker, 15 May 2019 - 11:26 AM.


#3242 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 1,982 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 15 May 2019 - 11:49 AM

^ Yah, there's a couple different layers at play. Basically, City of Vancouver will present a motion to the Lower Mainland Local Government Association to gauge support in advance of UBCM in September



#3243 Gary H

Gary H
  • Member
  • 3,241 posts

Posted 15 May 2019 - 11:54 AM

The Bay St. Bridge lane closure begins Tuesday May 21st.


  • Mike K. likes this

#3244 Coreyburger

Coreyburger
  • Member
  • 2,744 posts

Posted 15 May 2019 - 12:41 PM

 

Text of the 40k version of a similar motion from City of Victoria that was not endorsed at the UBCM in 2013.

WHEREAS local governments are concerned about resident safety on municipal streets, and lower vehicle speeds reduce the severity of injuries to pedestrians in vehicle/pedestrian collisions;

AND WHEREAS consistent province-wide speed limits promote driver awareness and ease enforcement between municipalities:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM request the Province of British Columbia to amend the Motor Vehicle Act to limit the default speed limit on a highway in a municipality to 40 km/h and allocate implementation funds to assist municipalities in installing signage for higher speeds where appropriate.

 

There is arguably a more sympathetic provincial government in place now, but the UBCM would still need to endorse it.

Link to UBCM Resolution search (use speed).

Interesting the number of times similar motions have been initiated. The results also include provincial/federal responses if the motion was approved at UBCM.

 

<snip>

Vancouver will also be asking the Union of BC Municipalities to lobby the Province for amendments to the Motor Vehicle Act to lower the default speed to 30 km/h, and allow municipalities to increase the default speed through local bylaws and signage.

 

 

But the 30 km/h was endorsed by UBCM in 2018 as part of a larger package of MVA reforms



#3245 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 1,982 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 16 May 2019 - 08:02 AM

But the 30 km/h was endorsed by UBCM in 2018 as part of a larger package of MVA reforms

 

Yah, it was part of a suite of recommendations contained in the "Modernize the MVA" resolution. This new one out of Vancouver seems to be a "squeaky wheel gets the grease" scenario. The Province was able to dodge the question by simply stating that any significant amendments to the MVA would require years of work, consultation, etc. By limiting the resolution to a single issue, they may be hoping for a better answer. Unlikely, but hey, don't know until you ask.

 

Also notable is that the Vancouver resolution specifically names all road users, as some councillors thought that the language was vague and could be interpreted as allowing cyclists to travel faster than 30 km/h.



#3246 FogPub

FogPub
  • Member
  • 198 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 17 May 2019 - 11:28 PM

Anyone know any rationale for the idiotic changes recently made to Cadboro Bay Rd on the long downhill going in to Cadboro Bay village?

 

There's a sidewalk on the road now (rather than just paving the informal trail already existing along that side of the road) marked off by curbstones like you'd find in a parking lot.  And a bus stop halfway down with posts on the centre line to prevent traffic from passing a stopped bus.

 

Bikes are forced to share the car lane, where before the lane was more than wide enough for all and had room for on-street parking as well.


  • Daveyboy likes this

#3247 DustMagnet

DustMagnet
  • Member
  • 936 posts
  • LocationView Royal

Posted 18 May 2019 - 01:08 PM

I think this is the section you are referring to:

 

"The proposed walkway is on the roadway because, even with boulevard clearing in some locations, the grades to access the driveways would be unmanageable, extremely steep and costly if we were to provide a sidewalk behind the curb. This is also a temporary facility that can be implemented in the 3-4month period with the current budget we have available, versus a more expensive and involved design which would take years." - https://www.saanich....ects.html#trans

 

It was a cheaper, faster way to protect pedestrians.



#3248 sebberry

sebberry

    Resident Housekeeper

  • Moderator
  • 18,088 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted Yesterday, 10:21 PM

I'm going to take a few minutes tomorrow and share my thoughts with the black hole of 'thanks for your submission' that is the City of Victoria - tonight's drive across the Johnson St Bridge was scary.  Dark, rainy, some twit with his high-beams on behind me and I couldn't for the life of me see the lane markings one bit entering the right curve coming off the bridge - it's atrocious.  I don't recall the last time I felt that uncomfortable.  


  • VIResident likes this

Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network

Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams

 


#3249 VIResident

VIResident
  • Member
  • 190 posts
  • LocationVancouver Island

Posted Today, 12:53 PM

The Bay St. Bridge lane closure begins Tuesday May 21st.

 

CFAX had a pie company and Moon Under Water Brewpub on air - both establishments very close to the bridgework & one lane (east) closure.

Both establishments reported they are usually super busy and as of the closure, dead, no business.  All parking removed from area (apparently the contractor did not ask the parking be removed the City did this on its own accord.) The question raised was why not have alternating lane closure? That got me thinking.  Did we not recently hear View Royal Mayor say they are exploring more traffic measures?  Perhaps City of Victoria and View Royal working together to 'test' traffic patterns with a total shut-down of the east bound lane (going into Victoria) on the bridge?  Morning rush hour comes from the west, many who prefer going through View Royal than using TCH and with the lane now closed..... Feel for those businesses, if today is an example of what they can expect for the next 5 months, well, one has to wonder if they will survive. 



#3250 Jason-L

Jason-L
  • Member
  • 1,140 posts

Posted Today, 01:48 PM

CFAX had a pie company and Moon Under Water Brewpub on air - both establishments very close to the bridgework & one lane (east) closure.

Both establishments reported they are usually super busy and as of the closure, dead, no business.  All parking removed from area (apparently the contractor did not ask the parking be removed the City did this on its own accord.) The question raised was why not have alternating lane closure? That got me thinking.  Did we not recently hear View Royal Mayor say they are exploring more traffic measures?  Perhaps City of Victoria and View Royal working together to 'test' traffic patterns with a total shut-down of the east bound lane (going into Victoria) on the bridge?  Morning rush hour comes from the west, many who prefer going through View Royal than using TCH and with the lane now closed..... Feel for those businesses, if today is an example of what they can expect for the next 5 months, well, one has to wonder if they will survive. 

Pie Company would be Saltchuck



#3251 jasmineshinga

jasmineshinga
  • Member
  • 130 posts

Posted Today, 01:53 PM

I personally plan to visit Moon and Saltchuck more often while the closure is on, they might not be so crowded I can't hear myself think anymore :D

 

Also, damned fine beer and pies, they're already part of my regular rotation.


  • Mike K. likes this

~ Jasmine ~


#3252 vortoozo

vortoozo
  • Member
  • 422 posts

Posted Today, 02:50 PM

The question raised was why not have alternating lane closure? 

 

This was addressed in one of the media articles about the closing, I forget which one. There were several reasons including BC Transit routing, emergency services access, traffic flow studies, predictability, etc.

 

If alternating traffic were in place, Bay Street would get backed up and customers wouldn't be able to access the businesses from Bay either. And the Vic West side would get gridlocked since there's really nowhere to stop all the traffic.


Edited by vortoozo, Today, 02:52 PM.


#3253 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 47,516 posts

Posted Today, 02:53 PM

Wouldn’t it make sense to have alternating traffic based on the time of day? Ie, eastbound from midnight to noon, then westbound from noon to midnight? Or whatever?

Adding an additional eastbound lane to the JSB in the AM would also help. It just feels like the City is simply indifferent to the situation. We’ve got options. Let’s use them.
  • Nparker likes this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#3254 vortoozo

vortoozo
  • Member
  • 422 posts

Posted Today, 02:55 PM

Wouldn’t it make sense to have alternating traffic based on the time of day? Ie, eastbound from midnight to noon, then westbound from noon to midnight? Or whatever?

 

Not if you consider BC Transit routing & emergency access requirements.

Believe the closest fire station to Vic West is the one on Bay & Douglas, so a clear path across the bridge at all times makes a lot of sense.



#3255 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 47,516 posts

Posted Today, 03:07 PM

BC Transit has already switched the 14 to the Johnson Street Bridge, and emergency vehicles would have the same access regardless of whether traffic is flowing one way or the other, I think? I mean westbound fire trucks can still cross the bridge if traffic is flowing one-way eastbound; crews would stop traffic if the lights and sirens are approaching.


Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


 



4 user(s) are reading this topic

2 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


    G-Man, Fox