Sunshine Terrace: In the shadow of retail giants
#21
Posted 27 December 2006 - 09:58 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#22
Posted 27 December 2006 - 09:58 AM
#23
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:00 AM
^It's pretty hard to walk back to your condo with a typical load from a big box store. You know how it is. You go in for one thing and end up leaving with [url=http://www.alteconline.com/images/Pallet%20Conveyors1.jpg:9f573]more than you bargained for[/url:9f573].
If you could buy that in bulk it might actually be worth going there.
#24
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:02 AM
If you did a percaptia measurement of those that drive to Wal-mart in the West Comms and those that drive to the Wal-mart in Saanich I would guarantee that there are more people biking walking and riding the bus there than the one in Langford. I am sure it would still be the minority but it would be dramatically higher. Once the new Superstore is built it will be the same but I bet an even lower percentage of car users.
Also when these places are located closer to the majority of residents those that do drive, don't have to drive as far therefore polluting less.
I believe that's true. In case with Costco though the increase in "on-foot shoppers" will probably be way more modest. Coscto is bulk-shopping oriented, there are not many items sold in it that you would be able to carry in your hands. Even if more accessible location encouraged dropping by for a less than week's supply, it's just lack of small/light-weighted items that would mostly still keep this store in "shop by car" category.
#25
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:05 AM
#26
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:14 AM
#27
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:17 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#28
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:26 AM
#29
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:27 AM
Large parking lots aren't just ugly, they're also discouraging for pedestrians and detrimental to neighbourhoods in all sorts of ways (the empty desert phenomenon after hours has already been mentioned).
The only reason these developments flaunt their parking areas instead of hiding them is because they're allowed to do it. We don't have to search far and wide for better ways to introduce big stores into communities. There are plenty of examples even in Vancouver. There's a great Future Shop right on Broadway that's built right to the sidwalk and has residential above and shops on the ground floor. The parking for the new Best Buy/Canadian Tire complex on Cambie isn't evident from the street. There's also a Sport Chek on Broadway that's built right to the sidewalk, with lowrise residential above the store.
I'm not proposing some radical revision of contemporary ideals. I'm assuming cars and big box stores are both here to stay. I'm just saying we should do the best we can, rather than create wastelands and mourn the results.
Wouldn't that be awful to live there," said Saanich resident Marilyn Trupp.
Only because we made it that way. There's no necessary reason it should be awful. In fact, it should be terrific. We're talking about a bustling commercial area smack in the middle of a residential neighbourhood. The reason there's discord in the Sunshine Terrace case is because the commercial and the residential are not integrated. They're completely at odds with each other, because the commercial has been laid out for the benefit of cars rather than for the benefit of people.
#30
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:28 AM
Is this near GM place, Expo Blvd? Not built yet?
Yup, in the Cielo building near GM Place. My understanding is that its completed by I'm not 100% positive on that.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#31
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:29 AM
#32
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:31 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#33
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:32 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#34
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:33 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#35
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:40 AM
Caused a bit of controversy, too: http://forum.skyscra...ad.php?t=120090
But that (controversy)is probably unavoidable destiny of any city planning decision, especially this unusual. I like it.
2aastra. Thank you for clarification, that puts things in right perspective for me.
#36
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:44 AM
I took a tour around this building a couple of months ago and it was strange how it litterally butts right against Cambie St Bridge - a major arterial road. And along the bridge, townhomes. So if you lived there, you'd walk the quarter length of a bridge to reach your own doorstep.There's a pedestrian oriented Costco in downtown Vancouver at the base of this tower:
EDIT: Maybe it was the similar tower next to this one.
#37
Posted 27 December 2006 - 10:59 AM
#38
Posted 27 December 2006 - 11:00 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#39
Posted 27 December 2006 - 11:02 AM
This view shows the Staples and the entrance to the parkade.
#40
Posted 27 December 2006 - 11:08 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users