I tried once on CFAX. We got into a little bit of a back-and-forth but it didn't take long for the segment to end. I tried to put her claims into context for listeners, but every response I gave she responded to with additional statements that were purposefully misleading. Stuff like:
"The Northern Junk proposal is no taller than the Shoal Point building, which most Victorians agree is not a detriment to the harbour"
Her response:
"I was on council at the time, and I've heard from the public that the project is a gated community and detracts from the area."
How do you even respond to that? Shoal Point is no more and no less a gated community than any other residential development. Furthermore, it has a commercial component on the ground floor. It's statements like that which throw the public for a loop and confuse people.
It's like her latest statement about this project, it is neither out of scale nor inappropriate for its location. And as we've shown it is no larger than that was built on that site 100 years ago, but the 2015 version is out of scale, out of character, it detracts from Old Town, etc., etc.