...they are taking advantage of a crisis to push through their limp wristed agenda. Dont worry, there will be lots more.
Every city is pushing temporary-but-possibly-permanent street closures and speed limit reductions now, which conveniently jibes with the decades-long push for street closures and speed limit reductions (except today the justification is different than it was yesterday, and yesterday the justification was different than it was the day before).
No point even citing the places, just Google for it and you'll find thousands and thousands of examples.
Convenient crises have been the bread and butter of the system for many centuries, but this crisis might just be the most convenient one yet.
Anyway, methinks the anti-urbanists are going to have a field day now:
Small businesses have been strangled because of the plague,
Streets are being closed temporarily-but-possibly-permanently because of the plague,
Dense development is inappropriate or even dangerous because of the plague,
Getting around to other parts of town is going to be inconvenient if not discouraged outright because of the plague,
City centers and city parks are being packed with tenters and associated issues because of the plague,
It's the worst of all things. Note how we've got that same contradiction re: street closures that we had in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, etc. On the one hand we claim the street closures are for people, but on the other hand there's (still!) no associated push to add more people in the vicinity of the closures, by which the closures might actually have a chance to be successful.