I listened to Hammond when he first came on CFAX. There was no "get the bums out of the city" at all, but more of where was the leadership from the feds, province and city for the past 20 years to let these people fall through the cracks to where it is now.
Your response reminds me of all of the misguided dogma that is the CoV council. Quite frankly, it's pathetic. Citizens should not be afraid to walk in their neigbourhood.....and the two children that were stabbed to death by two individuals with mental illness that were homeless, one while they waited for a bus outside the TC and the other outside McDonalds......but as you trivialize it.....it's reduced to "I want more convenience and less eyesore for myself". Good luck with that. The rest of us want those individuals to receive treatment more that just going to jail after something horrible happens.
Do you know what's *really* pathetic? When we take a **** on Grace Lore and the Together Victoria slate for their feelsy-goody progressive dogwhistling without actually elaborating on how they will do things different to actually improve the city, then along comes Hammond with similarly soothing, non-action words but everyone starts fawning over him because he comes with a more agreeable worldview.
Yeah no ****, most if not all residents want to see less homeless people begging and violent people not putting others at risk. What matters is how you tackle the problem. And what you see from Hammond and the New Council slate so far lacks that; we simply know that they would do something other than whatever it is Helps and the council are doing right now. We don't know much else because they have chosen to shroud themselves in non-committal, ambivalent language despite Hammond's well-documented activism. For all we know, his grand plan is to simply reduce shelter support, or to set impossible conditions for "responsible" social housing. Both would surely be crowd-pleasers because they'd reduce the number of homeless in the CoV, but they are simply passing the buck to some other jurisdiction rather than actually dealing with the problem. Hence, prioritization of convenience and perception - maybe the people the city is supposed to be helping don't really matter.