Jump to content

      













PROPOSED
Duck's Building
Use: condo
Address: 1314-1324 Broad Street
Municipality: Victoria
Region: Downtown Victoria
Storeys: 7
Condo units: 108 (studio/bachelor, 1BR, 2BR)
Sales status: in planning
The seven-storey historic Duck's Building development is comprised of 108-units of condominium residences and ... (view full profile)
Learn more about Duck's Building on Citified.ca
Photo

[Downtown Victoria] Duck's Block | renovation, redevelopment | Proposed


  • Please log in to reply
162 replies to this topic

#141 Citified.ca

Citified.ca
  • Administrator
  • 1,529 posts
  • LocationVictoria, BC

Posted 24 May 2019 - 11:01 AM

UVic-partnered-Broad-Street-condo-and-rental-complex-transitions-into-hotel-proposal.jpg

The Duck's Building, erected in 1892, is envisioned to become part of a hotel complex planned for the 1300-block of Broad Street between Yates and Johnson streets. The development concept for the UVic-owned properties was initially intended to create graduate student rental housing and market condominiums.

 

UVic-partnered Broad Street condo and rental complex transitions into hotel proposal


Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.

#142 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 11:23 AM

I don't know. There's a huge demand for short term space for people visiting UVic. There's a constant stream of visiting profs, guest lecturers, grad students etc. etc. all year round that need accommodation. But they're asking for a lot of density. The question remains, what direct tangible benefits does Victoria receive for this density request? I'm aware of the various spin-off benefits.


"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#143 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 22,870 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 11:28 AM

...what direct tangible benefits does Victoria receive for this density request...

An increased property tax base so I never get hit with a 22.5% boost in my CoV taxes in a single year ever again?



#144 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 11:37 AM

Are we sure it works like that?

 

Year to date, Langford has built more homes than Sidney, Central Saanich, North Saanich, Highlands, Metchosin, Esquimalt, View Royal, Saanich, Oak Bay combined.

 

 

Received the tax notice for my humble abode in Downtown Langford today. Up 12% from last year. That's a big jump compared to previous years, usually 3 or 4%. Wondering if anyone else has seen this big of a jump. Maybe they screwed up when doing the math. 

https://vibrantvicto...taxes/?p=493472

"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#145 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 12,690 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 11:48 AM

I don't know. There's a huge demand for short term space for people visiting UVic. There's a constant stream of visiting profs, guest lecturers, grad students etc. etc. all year round that need accommodation. But they're asking for a lot of density. The question remains, what direct tangible benefits does Victoria receive for this density request? I'm aware of the various spin-off benefits.


Density is a benefit in and of itself, as it means more people downtown shopping, sitting in parks and walking around.

Visit my blog at: https://www.sidewalkingvictoria.com 

 

It has a whole new look!

 


#146 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:11 PM

Yeah, I get all the spin-off effects. But are you saying that's it? What about the OCP, the ask above permitted density?


"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#147 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 22,870 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:21 PM

What are the negative effects of asking for increased density for this site?



#148 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,175 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:33 PM

The negatives of "too much red tape" are on full display with our exorbitant housing costs. 


Edited by jonny, 24 May 2019 - 12:33 PM.

  • Nparker likes this

#149 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 22,870 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:41 PM

The negatives of "too much red tape" are on full display with our exorbitant housing costs. 

Not to mention the total lack of decision making skills by local government as witnessed at last night's CoV council gong show.



#150 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:46 PM

By that logic, just throw the OCP out the window and let UVic and Chard build 10, heck, make it 20 storeys.


  • jonny likes this

"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#151 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 22,870 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 12:54 PM

:thumbsup:



#152 DustMagnet

DustMagnet
  • Member
  • 1,098 posts
  • LocationView Royal

Posted 24 May 2019 - 02:00 PM

By that logic, just throw the OCP out the window and let UVic and Chard build 10, heck, make it 20 storeys.

 

The choir listens enraptured...



#153 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 03:55 PM

Apparently building housing is too onerous, thanks to a council who keeps telling us we’re in a housing crisis. Make sense of that.
  • Nparker likes this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#154 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 12,690 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 05:33 PM

Yeah, I get all the spin-off effects. But are you saying that's it? What about the OCP, the ask above permitted density?


I think we made a rule based on nothing. If I saw some sort of science behind FSR ratios maybe I could be convinced but they seem pretty arbitrary to me.
  • Nparker and jonny like this

Visit my blog at: https://www.sidewalkingvictoria.com 

 

It has a whole new look!

 


#155 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 22,870 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 05:34 PM

This same council believes that by raising taxes on residential property owners it will somehow bring down the cost of housing in the city.



#156 jonny

jonny
  • Member
  • 9,175 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 05:44 PM

By that logic, just throw the OCP out the window and let UVic and Chard build 10, heck, make it 20 storeys.


That’s what they do in Atlanta and Houston. Two cities that have dirt cheap real estate.

Not saying we should do that exactly. Just sayin.

#157 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 12,690 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 06:26 PM

I think that Old Town is special and needs special design guidelines but they should be based on something. The current FSR for Old Town doesn't align with the parts of it that are the most special. We made them up because there was an idea that smaller was better. What we should be doing is looking at what makes Old Town awesome and replicating that and I think that apart from some of legitimate design problems here, this proposal does that.

Visit my blog at: https://www.sidewalkingvictoria.com 

 

It has a whole new look!

 


#158 Kapten Kapsell

Kapten Kapsell
  • Member
  • 2,077 posts

Posted 11 June 2019 - 03:45 PM

Some renderings from the application (posted to dev tracker today):

99D0F13B-9EEB-4EA8-8E6F-D045E090F083.jpeg
840A35F4-880C-43E0-8B57-EDBA59E9821D.jpeg

#159 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 11 June 2019 - 03:59 PM

The left-side building looks different in the two renderings, especially the upper floor setbacks and the window shapes.


"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#160 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 2,154 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 11 June 2019 - 04:00 PM

Nice that it finally looks like three buildings



You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users