This individual was supposed to appear in court today, but I don't see anything on the Victoria court list related to this today.
Posted 07 August 2018 - 04:19 PM
This individual was supposed to appear in court today, but I don't see anything on the Victoria court list related to this today.
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
Posted 07 August 2018 - 04:46 PM
Don't let them out. That's the point. Is there really any reason to let a chronic offender out of prison? I can't think of a single reason at all.
Posted 07 August 2018 - 08:00 PM
Frankly, I would be happy with a thirty strikes law. Even a fifty strikes law would work wonders. Fifty criminal convictions and you get a five year federal prison term.
That is a pretty sad indictment of our "justice" system. Maybe we should be giving them frequent flyer miles.
Posted 07 August 2018 - 11:00 PM
That is a pretty sad indictment of our "justice" system. Maybe we should be giving them frequent flyer miles.
Yeah and to be clear I'm not a "lock 'em up and throw away the key" type of police officer. However, I do think that after thirty, forty or fifty convictions with a variety of sentences in the provincial correctional system, maybe it's time for something different. The federal correctional system has different levels of accountability, security, services, education and training opportunities compared to the provincial correctional system here in British Columbia.
Posted 08 August 2018 - 05:42 AM
This sounds like some bizarre new plan to send the compulsive shoplifter away to a Federal Penitentiary for life.
Thank God we live in Canada, where courts render such decisions, not police or private citizens who think they know better.
How about first ensuring that police are actually enforcing the laws that are already on the books, and enforcing them equally - across the board ... at least before we decide that some miscreant needs to go to a Federal penitentiary for life.
Posted 08 August 2018 - 06:04 AM
That is a pretty sad indictment of our "justice" system. Maybe we should be giving them frequent flyer miles.
Posted 08 August 2018 - 06:25 AM
Yeah and to be clear I'm not a "lock 'em up and throw away the key" type of police officer. However, I do think that after thirty, forty or fifty convictions with a variety of sentences in the provincial correctional system, maybe it's time for something different. The federal correctional system has different levels of accountability, security, services, education and training opportunities compared to the provincial correctional system here in British Columbia.
Agreed, its the old definition of insanity.... doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.
If someone has a rap sheet going into the multiple dozens they are not likely to all of a sudden change their ways and reform to become contributing members of society. They will continue to be a drain on society. So perhaps an ultimatum is in order or as the saying goes
“Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.”They know the system and how to manipulate it to their advantage....so perhaps its time to change it up, like instead of jail its the fireline in the middle of nowhere for a few months
This sounds like some bizarre new plan to send the compulsive shoplifter away to a Federal Penitentiary for life.
Thank God we live in Canada, where courts render such decisions, not police or private citizens who think they know better.
How about first ensuring that police are actually enforcing the laws that are already on the books, and enforcing them equally - across the board ... at least before we decide that some miscreant needs to go to a Federal penitentiary for life.
But therein lies the problem, the Courts are not doing their job effectively for a subset of society and the end result is massive investment of resources to work with a few and no change in circumstances. I think the police are 'actually enforcing the laws that are on the books' its the Crown Prosecution service that considers the laying of charges and then what they do if it goes that far is plea it down as they dont have the resources to follow through in the system....so Johnny may have been charged for several B&E's, caught fencing stolen property, possession of housebreaking tools, perhaps drugs and a weapon and this is his 20th or 40th charge and the Crown (folks like Nils Jensen) determine the likelihood of conviction etc and they work with the taxpayer under-funded public defender and plea it down to a B&E and wit the 30 days already served they go in front of the judge and he gets another 30 days and then he's out, clean clothes, a few weeks of proper food, a medical checkup and a haircut ready to play the game all over again
Posted 08 August 2018 - 08:28 AM
The guy who was taken down by security guards at Uptown has a rap sheet three pages long on the online court records system. And that's only for the Victoria Law Courts. Who knows what else and where else he's been criminally active.
Meanwhile people actually went to his defence arguing that he was the victim. Unreal.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 08 August 2018 - 08:34 AM
And the woman starting fires on rjag's road appeared n "Victoria's integrated court system" apparently a special court for people with challenges. Hence why nothing appearing on the court list for the 7th.
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
Posted 08 August 2018 - 06:10 PM
yeah I thought the same. What the heck is going on in people’s minds... i really would like to understand what logic they use to reach these conclusions.The guy who was taken down by security guards at Uptown has a rap sheet three pages long on the online court records system. And that's only for the Victoria Law Courts. Who knows what else and where else he's been criminally active.
Meanwhile people actually went to his defence arguing that he was the victim. Unreal.
Edited by A Girl is No one, 08 August 2018 - 06:10 PM.
Posted 08 August 2018 - 06:14 PM
Yes, special courts are multiplying: special courts for drug addicts and people with mental health issues, special courts for Indigenous people, etc. All of these seem to absolve the culprits of their crimes. The rest of the population however has to live up to a different set of standards (thank goodness!). How long is the rest of the population going to put up with these double standards, I wonder? We’ll have to wait and see.And the woman starting fires on rjag's road appeared n "Victoria's integrated court system" apparently a special court for people with challenges. Hence why nothing appearing on the court list for the 7th.
Posted 11 August 2018 - 05:37 PM
Posted 13 August 2018 - 07:21 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
Posted 13 August 2018 - 09:12 AM
The attackers tent was probably less than 50' away.
The cops and politico's allow miscreants to camp in Beacon Hill Park and then express shock and surprise when crimes occur?
Despite the B.C. Supreme Court order allowing campers overnight, the increase in violent crime in the park should override that ruling, and even if it doesn't - The COV has a very strong case to make banning all camping in Beacon Hill Park in order to restore safety and order to the area.
Enact a complete (and immediate) ban on camping due to rapidly rising crime and citizen safety concerns ... and let the legal cards fall where they may.
Posted 13 August 2018 - 09:31 AM
I'm under the impression there's some kind of legal precedent here where you need a court injunction to get rid of these camps. If that's the case whatever happened to the concept of our legislative and executive branches being supreme to the judicial branch? Do municipal governments need a permission slip from a judge to enforce other laws?
Posted 13 August 2018 - 09:39 AM
I'm under the impression there's some kind of legal precedent here where you need a court injunction to get rid of these camps. If that's the case whatever happened to the concept of our legislative and executive branches being supreme to the judicial branch? Do municipal governments need a permission slip from a judge to enforce other laws?
It's because they are city by-laws, not provincial or federal codes. So (correct me if I'm wrong) a person can only be fined, not arrested. Once an injunction is granted, it gives police the authority to arrest those who do not comply.
Posted 13 August 2018 - 11:53 AM
I think the injunction takes into account that nobody in a "tent city" is going to go peacefully, and therefore the injunction gives blanket legal authority to specifically do whatever it takes to get the specific folks in that specific tent city out of there.
I'm not sure the injunction authorizes arrest, as we saw with Chrissy Brett and her arrest at Uptown Tent city ... an arrest that occurred with no injunction in place.
Injunction or no injunction ... apparently if the cops feel you're breaking a law (which may not be camping, but may be kicking a cop in the kneecap) , they can and will arrest you.
Posted 13 August 2018 - 12:35 PM
I think the injunction takes into account that nobody in a "tent city" is going to go peacefully, and therefore the injunction gives blanket legal authority to specifically do whatever it takes to get the specific folks in that specific tent city out of there.
I'm not sure the injunction authorizes arrest, as we saw with Chrissy Brett and her arrest at Uptown Tent city ... an arrest that occurred with no injunction in place.
Injunction or no injunction ... apparently if the cops feel you're breaking a law (which may not be camping, but may be kicking a cop in the kneecap) , they can and will arrest you.
Oh absolutely, if you are breaking some other law they certainly can arrest. (ie in Brett's case: preventing the firefighters from doing their job). But they can't arrest you for not packing up your tent and leaving without the injunction.
Posted 13 August 2018 - 04:40 PM
Posted 13 August 2018 - 05:16 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users