^ Interesting. I don't think that a stand-alone police force for Victoria is the direction most people are wanting.
From an operational point - it is important to consider the following.
Under the Framework Agreement, when the Police Board presents a budget, both municipalities have to agree.
As in the case of this year, the budget was for an increase in 6 officers, 4 civilians. This is what the board called “a bare bones budget”.
Victoria council approved and Esquimalt didn’t.
The next step under the agreement is arbitration. That’s 18 months where we don’t have the necessary positions and VicPD struggles through. It’s untenable.
My position is, a stand alone department gives us freedoms to adjust policing for Victoria without influence from a minor contributor.
Is it ideal? No. But it is more practical that what we have at present.
I’d prefer a regional model. Without that, I want more autonomy for our Chief to get the resources he needs.
That Esqumalt doesn’t want positions that are needed to run an efficient department, I can’t comment.
But I do know that policing is more complex that cars patrolling streets and having a police station open so people can drop by.
There are departments that collect and analyze data for intelligence-based policing, crime prevention, investigations, targeted policing, and so on.
No one in their right mind would set up 5-6 police departments in a region such as the CRD in today’s environment.
We need collaboration, we need more effective policing, and we need policing that responds regionally.
As long as we fight to maintain isolation, we may never meet the challenges we all face.
But, as I stated, given the alternative, I opt for a stand alone department until we all come to our senses. It’s the best we can do for Victoria.