What they appear to want can never be achieved economically and politically.
Methinks the key phrase is "appear to want". It's the eternal pursuit of an ambiguous, indescribable, and unreachable ideal. We used to see this all the time back in the day when particular reporters were giving particular councilors a huge amount of press re: their development complaints. The Northern Junk saga was also heavy with this. And now the torch has been passed to the DRA.
The DRA's language has also become increasingly political (as in, worthless), full of vacuous phrases like "meaningful public consultation". Considering all of the issues in Harris Green and downtown, the following line suggests a pretty severe disconnect from reality:
- the amenity contribution should be in cash, so the City can decide what amenities are needed.
The CoV knows what's best for Harris Green. Who could possibly argue with that?
And then there's the following, which just blows my mind. Victorians always want to wipe things out and clear things away. Gotta open things up, right? It never seems to work, but maybe that's because we've never really done it in the right way. Exactly where in Harris Green do we think it would even be feasible to wipe out enough buildings to create a half-decently worthwhile park? And why oh why are we still acting as if the neglected boulevard green itself does not exist? If you want to spend public money then spend it on making existing things better.
The City should commit to acquiring land for additional green space in our neighbourhood.