Jump to content

      



























Photo

Sewage treatment in Victoria | McLoughlin Point Wastewater Treatment Plant


  • Please log in to reply
5673 replies to this topic

Poll: What do you think of the report $1.2 billion Dollar sewage treatment cost. (77 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you think of the report $1.2 billion Dollar sewage treatment cost.

  1. We need it and waited too long that is the cost of waiting too long! (65 votes [23.47%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 23.47%

  2. Local, Provincial, and Federal politicians will find a way to help cut down the price to property owners. (3 votes [1.08%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 1.08%

  3. Out of the question, too expensive for Greater Victoria. (122 votes [44.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 44.04%

  4. It expensive, but if we do nothing costs will only rise. (20 votes [7.22%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.22%

  5. We need to do it but greatly scale back the project. It has grwon out of hand. (34 votes [12.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.27%

  6. No opinion, I do not know enough about the project to say of the costs are out of line or not. (33 votes [11.91%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 11.91%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#5401 Tom Braybrook

Tom Braybrook

    tom braybrook

  • Member
  • 1,578 posts

Posted 25 November 2020 - 11:19 PM

Or there was money on the table for the taking and they could then brag about job creation.

Consulting engineers love that 15% !  The bigger the project the better...for them at least!



#5402 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,539 posts

Posted 15 December 2020 - 11:55 AM

It’s operating!

From the CRD: https://youtu.be/w8_U5-Ofq44

“The $775-million Wastewater Treatment Project is now treating wastewater. Thank you to our residents for their patience during construction, and to our funding partners for their valued contribution. Together we are doing our part to protect our ocean.”

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#5403 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,736 posts

Posted 15 December 2020 - 12:10 PM

Have they found a home for the biosolids yet?



#5404 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,539 posts

Posted 15 December 2020 - 12:41 PM

The ocean!
  • Nparker and Matt R. like this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#5405 On the Level

On the Level
  • Member
  • 2,891 posts

Posted 15 December 2020 - 08:06 PM

Have they found a home for the biosolids yet?

 

BHP



#5406 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,736 posts

Posted 15 December 2020 - 08:21 PM

Hasn't BHP already maxed out its biohazard quota?


  • A Girl is No one likes this

#5407 North Shore

North Shore
  • Member
  • 2,169 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 09:43 AM

I wonder if anyone has or is going to take samples of the effluent from the new plant, and compare it to what came out of Clover Point to see if there is any substantial differences between the two?


  • Nparker and Hotel Mike like this
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?

#5408 johnk2

johnk2
  • Member
  • 209 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 10:11 AM

Mr. Floatie unemployed now.



#5409 Dexter

Dexter
  • Member
  • 606 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 10:17 AM

Replaced by MR Sludgy
  • Nparker and Matt R. like this

#5410 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 01:31 PM

I wonder if anyone has or is going to take samples of the effluent from the new plant, and compare it to what came out of Clover Point to see if there is any substantial differences between the two?

No doubt that CRD will have lots of end-of-pipe measurements to be able to boast how much cleaner the discharged effluent is with tertiary treatment instead of just preliminary treatment (the 6 mm screens only).

 

However, as several marine scientists have emphasized for more than a decade, the proof of improvement isn't at the end-of-pipe, but rather out in the ocean further away: any differences in the health, variety and population size of benthic animal colonies. They were pretty sure there wouldn't be a measurable improvement in those factors. 

 

New concerns over the micro-bead plastics getting out might suggest that there could be an additional benefit of further treatment, while new awareness of significant ocean acidification due to climate change could counter that the impact of Victoria's effluent discharge - treated or not - might not be as big a factor for ocean health as previously thought (The Race for Adaptation in an Increasingly Acidic Salish Sea)

 
:)

#5411 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,736 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 01:40 PM

...the impact of Victoria's effluent discharge - treated or not - might not be as big a factor for ocean health as previously thought...

Well it was only a billion dollars. Pocket change really.  :whyme:



#5412 Jackerbie

Jackerbie
  • Member
  • 3,776 posts
  • LocationRichmond, BC

Posted 16 December 2020 - 02:02 PM

Have they found a home for the biosolids yet?

 

Long term, no.

 

Short term, they'll be trucked to the tallest building in Richmond! aka the Lafarge concrete plant.



#5413 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,736 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 02:07 PM

...Short term, they'll be trucked to the tallest building in Richmond! aka the Lafarge concrete plant.

I am glad there's zero environmental impact from trucking biosolids from the CRD to the lower mainland.


  • Mike K. likes this

#5414 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 02:08 PM

Well it was only a billion dollars. Pocket change really.  :whyme:

The initial capital estimate for the plant was $1.2 billion but was reduced when CRD engineers decided that a branch-plant wasn't needed in Haro Woods (just a big buried tank to hold storm water+sewage) - saving about $200 million or more.

Most-often repeated estimate has been about $750-800 million for the plant, although when there was talk of 2-4 smaller distributed plants, I think the total was climbing to about $900 mllion.

But thats not including a large annual sum for operations/maintenance, nor some potential cost issues with sewage sludge disposal. 


:)

#5415 sebberry

sebberry

    Resident Housekeeper

  • Moderator
  • 21,508 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 16 December 2020 - 02:43 PM

Long term, no.

 

Short term, they'll be trucked to the tallest building in Richmond! aka the Lafarge concrete plant.

 

Oh that explains the extra ferry sailings :D


  • Nparker and Matt R. like this

Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network

Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams

 


#5416 Tom Braybrook

Tom Braybrook

    tom braybrook

  • Member
  • 1,578 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 03:14 PM

The initial capital estimate for the plant was $1.2 billion but was reduced when CRD engineers decided that a branch-plant wasn't needed in Haro Woods (just a big buried tank to hold storm water+sewage) - saving about $200 million or more.

Most-often repeated estimate has been about $750-800 million for the plant, although when there was talk of 2-4 smaller distributed plants, I think the total was climbing to about $900 mllion.

But thats not including a large annual sum for operations/maintenance, nor some potential cost issues with sewage sludge disposal. 

that's a lot of dough for something that was completely unnecessary...makes for a good photo-op and pr bumpf though!


  • Nparker and Matt R. like this

#5417 spanky123

spanky123
  • Member
  • 21,008 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 03:21 PM

The initial capital estimate for the plant was $1.2 billion but was reduced when CRD engineers decided that a branch-plant wasn't needed in Haro Woods (just a big buried tank to hold storm water+sewage) - saving about $200 million or more.

Most-often repeated estimate has been about $750-800 million for the plant, although when there was talk of 2-4 smaller distributed plants, I think the total was climbing to about $900 mllion.

But thats not including a large annual sum for operations/maintenance, nor some potential cost issues with sewage sludge disposal. 

 

If I recall, the CRD is paying a FN group $400K a year just to truck the sludge to Vancouver. On top of that will be the costs of handling the sludge when the Vancouver plant shuts down 6-8 weeks a year.



#5418 spanky123

spanky123
  • Member
  • 21,008 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 03:23 PM

 

No doubt that CRD will have lots of end-of-pipe measurements to be able to boast how much cleaner the discharged effluent is with tertiary treatment instead of just preliminary treatment (the 6 mm screens only).

 

However, as several marine scientists have emphasized for more than a decade, the proof of improvement isn't at the end-of-pipe, but rather out in the ocean further away: any differences in the health, variety and population size of benthic animal colonies. They were pretty sure there wouldn't be a measurable improvement in those factors. 

 

New concerns over the micro-bead plastics getting out might suggest that there could be an additional benefit of further treatment, while new awareness of significant ocean acidification due to climate change could counter that the impact of Victoria's effluent discharge - treated or not - might not be as big a factor for ocean health as previously thought (The Race for Adaptation in an Increasingly Acidic Salish Sea)

 

 

 

I think the issue is that few of the harmful chemicals which get peed out or dumped down the toilet will be filtered out. 


  • North Shore and Matt R. like this

#5419 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,736 posts

Posted 16 December 2020 - 03:29 PM

I think the issue is that few of the harmful chemicals which get peed out or dumped down the toilet will be filtered out. 

The harmful chemicals should have got themselves some cute dancing mascots if they had wanted to be taken seriously in the treatment plant debate.


  • spanky123 and Matt R. like this

#5420 JohnN

JohnN
  • Member
  • 2,172 posts

Posted 17 December 2020 - 06:22 AM

News story in yesterday's Times Colonist is an attempt to erase the massive amount of community and expert opinion against another (the biggest) CRD sewage plant. No mention of years of effort by many local marine scientists and advocates for marine sewage treatment. CRD has already been posting its history of the development of the sewage plant (crammed into a  27-page pdf)- without mention opposition by scientists, community, advocates (only the "pro-side" mascot Mr. Floatie). CRD couldn't avoid opposition by municipal politicians of Esquimalt especially, with some from Colwood - but no mention of long-standing opposition by federal Minister of Environment David Anderson. 

 

No mention of the hundreds of Esquimaltonians and others at rallies against a risky sewage sludge plant that would have been plunked into an Esquimalt-Vic West neighbourhood. 

 

"History is written by the victors"?? But the history of this sewage plant's operations is just beginning. No doubt governments will now attempt to downplay information that might show this sewage plant+sludge plant in a bad light. 

 

 
:)

You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users