Victoria homelessness and street-related issues
#16601
Posted 13 October 2019 - 12:36 PM
#16602
Posted 13 October 2019 - 01:04 PM
If you want to laugh, check out the banner graphic that sits atop the Twitter page of Against Displacement, the "activist" organization behind the Victoria tent city and others. It gives insight, I think, into why homelessness in these parts is not likely to be solved in the near future, because groups like this have too much influence...
https://twitter.com/stopdisplacemnt
as usual some sjws that aren’t homeless take over and expand the agenda.
#16604
Posted 13 October 2019 - 03:42 PM
https://youtu.be/R1elBgwBu2g
#16605
Posted 13 October 2019 - 09:27 PM
Capture.JPG
Was John Horgan born with laser eyes, or is this something the BC taxpayer has had to pay for?
I'm pretty certain the ramblings of this group and their UVic staff associates likely help fuel the bad-cop fantasies of several council members.
- A Girl is No one likes this
#16606
Posted 15 October 2019 - 07:18 PM
https://www.city-jou...co-homelessness
Too many great sections to paste here but here’s a short one that sounds very familiar:
“ The combination of maximal tolerance for antisocial behavior, on the one hand, and free services and food, on the other, acts as a magnet. ”
- Wayne and pennymurphy2000 like this
#16607
Posted 15 October 2019 - 07:36 PM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#16608
Posted 16 October 2019 - 11:32 AM
In Victoria, when people raised concerns about organized crime presence, on-sight assaults, sales of hard drugs to minors and break-ins, they were accused of homeless-hating by the thuggish "activists" and a gang of slick lawyers, tasked with essentially making sure the drug trade didn't get interupted.
In any case, this city needs a better approach. The amazing work of the local poverty industry and assorted activists seems to do absolutely nothing to help people who are suffering on the streets.
- Nparker and Daveyboy like this
#16609
Posted 21 October 2019 - 03:49 PM
The solution of: providing affordable homes for everyone (and a popular promise just now of some politicians).
Seems like a no-brainer, except:
1.) who pays? (us, through our taxes of course) and,
2.) what's the long term consequence?
The latter's by far the most worrisome to me. This planet has 7 billion+ people on it. If only 1% of the people head out to lovely Victoria in the next few decades because they've heard we've an established policy of 'providing affordable homes for everyone', that's some 70 million newcomers (a wee bit overwhelming).
jbw
#16610
Posted 21 October 2019 - 06:04 PM
Yeah I don’t get why this isn’t evident to everyone. To me it’s common sense do people not believe it or choose to ignore this ideal for personal feelVery interesting read.... actually presents a plan to make things better...
https://www.city-jou...co-homelessness
Too many great sections to paste here but here’s a short one that sounds very familiar:
“ The combination of maximal tolerance for antisocial behavior, on the one hand, and free services and food, on the other, acts as a magnet. ”
good helping vibes .I really would like to know .
#16611
Posted 23 October 2019 - 12:37 PM
The CoV is at odds with the security fence BC Housing installed along the Pandora frontage of its 844 Johnson housing project.
...BC Housing originally constructed the fence to ensure the safety of the residents and to address security concerns regarding people accessing the building who did not live there...staff recommend council decline BC Housing’s [variance] application due to a number of factors, including...the regularly-outlined aesthetic requirements...“The guidelines note that fences and gates must not contribute to a ‘fortress’ appearance from the street,”...
https://www.vicnews....ousing-divided/
Maybe the CoV should take a look at the aesthetics of the building since BC Housing took over the space. The fence is at least tidy and well-maintained. The same can't be said about what the public can see of the rest of the facility.
Edited by Nparker, 23 October 2019 - 12:58 PM.
- rmpeers likes this
#16612
Posted 23 October 2019 - 12:44 PM
The CoV is at odds with the security fence BC Housing installed along the Pandora Street frontage of its 844 Johnson housing project.
Maybe the CoV should take a look at the aesthetics of the building since BC Housing took over the space. The fence is at least tidy and well-maintained. The same can't be said about what the public can see of the rest of the facility.
Approval of this fence could also set a design standard in which other buildings along Pandora Avenue install similar fences, which would contribute to the public’s perception of whether the street or area is safe or not.”
Perception of safety? It's not the fence we need to worry about creating the wrong impression.
- pennymurphy2000 and A Girl is No one like this
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#16613
Posted 23 October 2019 - 12:47 PM
Perception of safety? It's not the fence we need to worry about creating the wrong impression.
Exactly.
#16614
Posted 23 October 2019 - 12:58 PM
The CoV is at odds with the security fence BC Housing installed along the Pandora Street frontage of its 844 Johnson housing project.
Maybe the CoV should take a look at the aesthetics of the building since BC Housing took over the space. The fence is at least tidy and well-maintained. The same can't be said about what the public can see of the rest of the facility.
Good God... so BC Housing correctly puts this fence up, knowing that the residents of this building are easy prey for drug dealers and lord knows who else, and now the stable geniuses of the CoV want to get rid of it?
Presumably they are worried the fence is slowing down the street drug trade, as it was clearly intended to do, and lord knows, the folks at city hall try to do everything humanly possible to ensure local drug gangs face as few obstacles as possible.
And they'd hate to create the impression the area is unsafe in any way. LOL. That is a pretty good joke, I'll admit. (It was meant to be a joke, right?)
More evidence of why the homeless and addicted in this city will never get any real help or the chance of a better future. Too many vested interests who want to keep the problem going, etc etc...
The scary thing is, how bad will things get once Mayor Isitt takes over...
- GaryRanson and A Girl is No one like this
#16615
Posted 23 October 2019 - 01:05 PM
..they'd hate to create the impression the area is unsafe in any way...
I suspect this is a big part of the CoV's concern. Denying the problem exists is so much easier than solving it.
- Love the rock, pennymurphy2000 and rmpeers like this
#16616
Posted 23 October 2019 - 04:18 PM
https://www.amazon.c...y/dp/0553447432
Carried by our GVPL (library).
I read this this past week, it certainly brings up a lot of issues I'd not thought of and fleshes out the tenant / landlord subcultures that have been contributing to the problem.
jbw
#16617
Posted 23 October 2019 - 04:27 PM
And nothing about all the other gates and fences that businesses and homeowners had to put up at their own expense, and obviously not for appearances. Those will be next if they pursue the same logic, cuz it makes the 844 Johnson residents look bad. Ugh.The CoV is at odds with the security fence BC Housing installed along the Pandora frontage of its 844 Johnson housing project.
Maybe the CoV should take a look at the aesthetics of the building since BC Housing took over the space. The fence is at least tidy and well-maintained. The same can't be said about what the public can see of the rest of the facility.
Edited by A Girl is No one, 23 October 2019 - 04:28 PM.
- Nparker and Love the rock like this
#16618
Posted 23 October 2019 - 08:56 PM
i remember a few years back when the church on pandora and vancouver fed up with having to clean up every day after homeless people, and having homeless people intimidate their members they put up a gate with fencing to let people feel safe... and the people at our place (and other street people) called it a "hate gate"
another business puts up blocks and bumps ontop of their fencing/short wall to prevent people from sitting on it and the business is attacked for being against homeless people
yet 844 johnson does the same thing (to keep the people who live in the building safe).. puts up a gate (much taller with a sharp top to prevent people from climbing over) and it's perfectly acceptable... seems like a bit of a double standard...
#16619
Posted 24 October 2019 - 07:32 AM
Yes, that was the Baptist Church on Pandora between Blanshard and Quadra. It created quite the reaction among activists and one individual spray painted "hate gate" on it.
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#16620
Posted 24 October 2019 - 09:54 AM
- Nparker, GaryRanson, Midnightly and 3 others like this
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)