Managing density / urban development
#1081
Posted 23 June 2023 - 07:16 AM
#1082
Posted 23 June 2023 - 07:34 AM
There actually isn't that much really in the ALR if you look at the map. I'm okay with not permitting development on that land if it truely is high value, arable land. Perhaps the rules around tax breaks should be reviewed, and if the goal is to increase agriculture production on said land, then incentivize that further.
I'm less okay with the arbitrary UCB; that affects land prices here far more, IMO.
Edited by lanforod, 23 June 2023 - 07:35 AM.
#1083
Posted 23 June 2023 - 07:39 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#1084
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:04 AM
Keeping ALR in and around Victoria is important for many reasons and food production is just one. There is still a ton of buildable land across the region so I think we are fine to leave what is one of the nicest parts of the region alone.
- Barrrister likes this
#1085
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:11 AM
What part is that, the nice part?
I dunno, a lot of what I'm seeing with ALR, is very wealthy people, living on very large estates, paying very low taxes. Surely we can turn some of these 5, 10 and 15 acre properties into more housing, no?
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#1086
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:24 AM
Keeping ALR in and around Victoria is important for many reasons and food production is just one. There is still a ton of buildable land across the region so I think we are fine to leave what is one of the nicest parts of the region alone.
Local area food production is less than 10% of what we consume. Why is this important to preserve? And if it is, why do we not seek to acquire the other 90% we need?
#1087
Posted 23 June 2023 - 11:21 AM
Local area food production is less than 10% of what we consume. Why is this important to preserve?
You obviously aren't looking ahead to WW3 and the "road warrior" society that will follow in its wake. You'd starve* if not for the agricultural reserve lands.
*We can assume there would be super strict new laws against hunting and fishing, in order to protect the environment. Heck, even daring to shoo a deer away from the ALR would probably be regarded as an offense against nature and therefore a major crime. Suffice it to say, things would be even more absurdly ironic and self-contradictory than they are now.
#1088
Posted 23 June 2023 - 04:19 PM
Local area food production is less than 10% of what we consume. Why is this important to preserve? And if it is, why do we not seek to acquire the other 90% we need?
It doesn’t have to be all or nothing. Lots of local product simply tastes better. Isn’t that reason enough?
- aastra, Barrrister, Victoria Watcher and 1 other like this
#1089
Posted 23 June 2023 - 06:53 PM
- Matt R. and Barrrister like this
#1090
Posted 23 June 2023 - 06:56 PM
...Once the price of a head of lettuce from Mexico reaches $50 because of climate change mandates we might be grateful we have the ability still to grow here.
Where we'll have the privilege of paying $60 because it's locally grown.
#1091
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:02 PM
- Matt R. and Barrrister like this
#1092
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:06 PM
In season, a company like Sysco or GFS stocks local produce by default, because it’s cheaper for them.
- Barrrister likes this
#1093
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:12 PM
- Matt R. likes this
#1094
Posted 23 June 2023 - 08:12 PM
Edited by dasmo, 23 June 2023 - 08:13 PM.
#1095
Posted 12 August 2023 - 09:57 PM
#1096
Posted 13 August 2023 - 01:25 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users