Belleville Terminal Concept | Proposed
#201
Posted 30 November 2011 - 11:01 PM
I think the nearby Stores building would make a great pub with some major modifications.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#202
Posted 30 November 2011 - 11:10 PM
^True, but would Matt be satisfied with a sublease?
I think the nearby Stores building would make a great pub with some major modifications.
Presumably, when and if it becomes a ferry passenger terminal, some other land more to the west becomes available for other waterfront stuff. But I'm not sure how you get Clipper passengers and their vessels over to that side of the parking lot for Coho vehicles. But I have not looked at it that close.
#203
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:39 AM
Was listening to someone about this in the morning on CBC and they reiterated that this would be a combined facility that will include the Coho and the Clippers and would work with them on design to meet their needs.
This is perhaps the best thing that has happened to the harbour since I lived here.
It was hinted at that the rest of the land to the West would be redeveloped and I would assume the plan would be to put the Coho holding area underground.
#204
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:02 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#205
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:20 AM
#206
Posted 01 December 2011 - 09:54 AM
Clippers would hopefully be a lot closer to the main building and perhaps with any luck would require the removal of Undersea Gardens.
If you look at the CRD map, you will see that the Undersea Gardens is located within a "foreshore lease" most likely in the name of Bob Wright.
I don't think that the Undersea Gardens is going anywhere anytime soon, at least not without the existence of a very large cheque.
#207
Posted 01 December 2011 - 12:14 PM
From the article:
The LAST thing the harbor needed would be some kitchy attempt at a tourist attraction. That style of tourism is dying quickly and the adherence to that in certain circles around here is really hurting things.Jamie Webb, president of the Maritime Museum's foundation, said, "We are a little disappointed that Victoria is not getting any new attractions or energies in the harbour."
#208
Posted 01 December 2011 - 12:59 PM
#209
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:16 PM
This is great. It's going to be the best use of that space for the city.
From the article:
The LAST thing the harbor needed would be some kitchy attempt at a tourist attraction. That style of tourism is dying quickly and the adherence to that in certain circles around here is really hurting things.
I don't think of the Maritime Museam as kitchy.
Now that it is not moving in there, how about a purpose built building at Ogden Point for it. If it was a large enough entity I think it could draw people to it, and would certainly get some cruise ship clientele.
#210
Posted 01 December 2011 - 07:44 PM
#211
Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:57 PM
Wouldn't the harbour be a wee bit congested if you have shore development and floating development?
#212
Posted 02 December 2011 - 07:23 PM
Now they are talking about a floating 2-3 storey building in the harbour.
Wouldn't the harbour be a wee bit congested if you have shore development and floating development?
That is the craziest idea yet. Next they will want to put remote controls into the exhibits and let the tourists pilot them around the harbour.
#213
Posted 02 December 2011 - 07:23 PM
Not compared to the way it was in the past
#214
Posted 03 December 2011 - 07:24 PM
^^
Not compared to the way it was in the past
Hard to make out the float planes taxiing around in that pic.
#215
Posted 03 December 2011 - 08:13 PM
Now they are talking about a floating 2-3 storey building in the harbour.
Wouldn't the harbour be a wee bit congested if you have shore development and floating development?
Where would this be located?
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Gold MLS® 2011-2023 | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com Looking at Condo Pre-Sales in Victoria? Save Thousands!
#216
Posted 04 December 2011 - 09:30 AM
Note: These sketches are just concept drawings to illustrate the possibilities that could occur on the site. They do not represent any existing proposal.
It is up to the development community to initiate a detailed proposal of their own.
Overview: note the new Hilton hotel on Belleville and its north/south orientation (vs. the east/west of the current motel)
Harbour view. Note the hotel at the extreme west side of the site (approx 12 storeys)
Belleville looking west. Note the CP building at right. The Wax Museum would be relocated in the new commercial building near the new terminal:
Belleville looking east:
Harbour side plaza. The lower walkway is for screened passengers, separated from the public by some sort of glass wall:
__________________
#217
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:06 AM
#218
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:37 AM
The gallery should be open by Spring.
#219
Posted 21 June 2012 - 11:54 AM
#220
Posted 21 June 2012 - 12:12 PM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users