Pacific Undersea Gardens
#41
Posted 29 October 2012 - 06:02 AM
A History of Oak Bay Marine Group
#42
Posted 29 October 2012 - 06:52 AM
#43
Posted 29 October 2012 - 06:58 AM
I'd be curious to know if you've visited. I have and had a terrible experience.
I went about 3 years ago and thought it was alright, for kids.
#44
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:01 AM
There are, for example, a lot of good restaurants in Victoria, and a lot of restaurants that do very well financially due to tourist trade. Some restaurants are in both categories, but others definitely are only in the last.
Having said all that, it is only subjective opinion, and if the place is able to survive and profit in the free market, power to it. But I don't count it among the examples of Victoria putting its best foot forward to our visitors.
#45
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:02 AM
Yeah, but kids are entertained by a cardboard box. The true test is how it stacks up against the Ocean Discovery Centre in Sidney and other ocean attractions. Is it fulfilling its potential? Unlikely, as the owners are clearly considering major renovations.I went about 3 years ago and thought it was alright, for kids.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#46
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:26 AM
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#47
Posted 29 October 2012 - 07:59 AM
But I have a question about the permit process. Why does the City of Victoria have any say in it? Why is the Harbour Authority not in charge of the harbour?
Lake Side Buoy - LEGO Nut - History Nerd - James Bay resident
#48
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:38 AM
Ironically, because of massively inflated expectations, we were maybe more disappointed by the ODC in Sidney. So were my relatives when they visited. Like, it's ok, but doesn't come close to the fine aquaria of the world - Vancouver, San Diego, etc. It's a decent collection of fish tanks, has some educational stuff, and a fun touch tank. The overblown entrance (fake airlock) is pretty unnecessary. We concluded that the ODC was also good for kids, and a very nice resource for a small town (Sidney).
#49
Posted 17 October 2013 - 07:25 AM
http://www.timescolo...a-area-1.662514
#50
Posted 17 October 2013 - 08:28 AM
Well it looks like the Undersea Gardens is closing. Wow, two old school Victoria establishments announce closing in the same week. Capital 6 and Undersea Gardens. Start the speculation on what will be done with the Inner Harbour space that UG occupies.
http://www.timescolo...a-area-1.662514
Never helpful to lose tourist attractions in a city that is dependent on tourism for a lot of jobs, but it is hard to get to worked up about this place going.
#51
Posted 17 October 2013 - 08:38 AM
Never helpful to lose tourist attractions in a city that is dependent on tourism for a lot of jobs, but it is hard to get to worked up about this place going.
Exactly; the facility is antiquated, cramped, unremarkable and can't begin to compare to similar attractions I've seen in Hawaii, San Diego or Mexico. It long ago ceased to be a "major" draw and needs to go. Sounds like they will try to absorb the staff into other positions within the OB Marine Group which is good. Otherwise "meh"......
#52
Posted 17 October 2013 - 08:56 AM
Never helpful to lose tourist attractions in a city that is dependent on tourism for a lot of jobs, but it is hard to get to worked up about this place going.
I don't agree when said tourist attraction is a total embarrassment. I would guess most people leave Undersea Gardens feeling slightly depressed and ripped off.
Tourists describe Victoria as follows:
"This "beautiful harbor town with great food" is "a pocket of charm and beauty" on the southern end of Vancouver Island. Our readers raved about the setting and architecture, and enjoyed the variety of activities: walking, biking, antiquing, dining at "great seafood restaurants," and visiting museums and the Butchart Gardens. It's a "hidden treasure.""
http://www.vicnews.c...tml?mobile=true
This idea that tourists need bogus tourist attractions or tourist traps is outdated in my opinion.
#53
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:13 AM
With Butchart Gardens now charging over $30 for summer admission some people forego visiting the gardens altogether, and the RBCM isn't exactly a cheap attraction at $16 per person. So where to next? We have no serious aquarium, no year-round or summer long expedition/thrill park, no lookout platforms like the Space Needle, Harbour Centre, Calgary Tower, etc., and the other tourist attractions haven't changed since the day they opened (I mean is there anything different about miniature world of 1980 and miniature world of 2013?).
Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.
#54
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:24 AM
(I mean is there anything different about miniature world of 1980 and miniature world of 2013?).
They're now required to post warning signs on the dangers of lead paint in the old miniatures?
That's all I can come up with.
Why do you think this is? We're a huge tourist city, why are all these tourist destinations closing?
Perhaps people don't choose Victoria as a tourism destination, but rather are here because their cruise ship docked here?
If we didn't have the cruise ships, would people still visit Victoria for what we have to offer or would they go to other more widely recognized tourist destinations?
Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network
Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams
#55
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:30 AM
All of this is just my own personal perception...I really haven't done any thorough research into what brings people to Victoria.
#56
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:32 AM
The cruise ships are not coming here as a tourist destination either they are coming here because they have to... they have no choice. Victotria just happens to be located in a convenient location for the cruise lines.
It makes sense for them and they get to make some extra revenue from admission profits.
They are coming here because of the Jones Act no other reason
The only crusie ships that come here are ones out of Seattle of San Fransisco.
You will never see a Vancouver ship coming here.
The gravy train started when cruising to Alaska became Hip.
#57
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:42 AM
In recent years we've lost Crystal Gardens (and it's successor BC Experience), the wax museum, and now the Undersea Gardens. It's a bit of a shame we're losing these sorts of attractions as they add a certain vibrance to the downtown area.
With Butchart Gardens now charging over $30 for summer admission some people forego visiting the gardens altogether, and the RBCM isn't exactly a cheap attraction at $16 per person. So where to next? We have no serious aquarium, no year-round or summer long expedition/thrill park, no lookout platforms like the Space Needle, Harbour Centre, Calgary Tower, etc., and the other tourist attractions haven't changed since the day they opened (I mean is there anything different about miniature world of 1980 and miniature world of 2013?).
I take it you didn't read my post just above yours? People surveyed care about the setting, food, charm, walkavility and architecture. They don't care about paying to look at an octopus in a tank.
#58
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:47 AM
#59
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:52 AM
In recent years we've lost Crystal Gardens (and it's successor BC Experience), the wax museum, and now the Undersea Gardens. It's a bit of a shame we're losing these sorts of attractions as they add a certain vibrance to the downtown area.
With Butchart Gardens now charging over $30 for summer admission some people forego visiting the gardens altogether, and the RBCM isn't exactly a cheap attraction at $16 per person. So where to next?
Crystal Gardens is the only thing on that list that I miss. But I don't think people come to Victoria to wander around indoors at underwhelming attractions. I think they come here to hang out on the causeway, eat outdoors on sunny patios, run, bike, paddle, and generally enjoy the high quality of life. Folks also come for specific events, such as JazzFest, and to enjoy things like the Buskers Festival. I think those events add more vibrancy than the aforementioned attractions.
And while we are reliant on cruise ships, I think some are overstating their importance. A lot of visitors arrive here through the Clipper, the Coho and the airport. For those folks we are a destination, not an incidental stop, and we should probably be most concerned about what attracts those cohorts.
/Also, Bug Zoo FTW...
#60
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:57 AM
The only reason this town is a tourist town is because of the cruise ships and that only makes it a tourist town from May till sept.
Really? Care to post some data that backs up this claim?
Quickly looking at some data from Chemistry consulting, approximately 461,000 cruise ship passengers and 166,000 crew "visited" Victoria YTD August. Meaning these people were on ships that docked in Victoria. We have no idea how many actualy got off the ship, and I would guess many stayed on board.
There are over 4,500 hotel/motel rooms in Victoria. YTD occupancy to the end of August was 67%. Most rooms have two occupants. YTD to the end of August is 243 days. 243 days X 4,554 rooms X 2 occupants X 67% = 1,482,873 occupants.
Divide this by two if you like as I'm sure many visitors stay for more than one night, but I hardly see any data which indicates "The only reason this town is a tourist town is because of the cruise ships and that only makes it a tourist town from May till Sept."
"Like a toddler giving a weather forecast" a man once said.
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users