[Downtown Victoria] View/Vancouver condos | 14-storeys | Canceled
#41
Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:37 PM
#42
Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:37 PM
#43
Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:47 PM
#44
Posted 23 February 2007 - 09:00 PM
A backhoe is playing with dirt on this lot. I forsee a new surface parking lot.
Is a parking lot a permitted use in the zone?
If so,
Wouldn't they need a permit?
Be required to meet certain standards?
And, with all the hassle some surface parking lot operator's have been getting over the last few years, would it even be worth the effort...
Edit: When I went by around 11:30 am today, City crews were measuring flows in the sewers at View and Vancouver.. and there are now a lot of surveyers' grafitti on the street and sidewalks...
#45
Posted 23 February 2007 - 10:07 PM
I'm meeting with Charlayne Thornton-Joe next Monday on the rehabilitation of the sinking corner.
#46
Posted 23 February 2007 - 10:17 PM
The raccoons would love it...
(**) EDIT: by "there," I don't mean the building lot, I mean the intersection (View & Vancouver).
#47
Posted 23 February 2007 - 10:28 PM
#48
Posted 24 February 2007 - 08:41 AM
#49
Posted 24 February 2007 - 01:15 PM
#50
Posted 24 February 2007 - 02:36 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#51
Posted 24 February 2007 - 04:48 PM
I have this fantasy about recreating an urban stream or ravine there(**), with a bridge going over it. Note: I said "fantasy." I know it'll never happen. But it seems crazy that we're looking at fixing this constant sink-hole in a battle against nature, when maybe it would be easier (in a way) to go with the flow, let that area be what it wants to be (isn't it a covered up stream/ waterbed that flows to the harbour, exiting near Market Square?). Open it up, put a bridge type structure over the intersection, and turn it into an attraction? It could be a public art work, a nature study project, a piece of urban engineering, a -- dare I say? -- tourist attraction.
The raccoons would love it...
(**) EDIT: by "there," I don't mean the building lot, I mean the intersection (View & Vancouver).
_________________
I love that idea!
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#52
Posted 24 February 2007 - 09:56 PM
It is intriguing to think about, though. There has been "deconstruction" in fashion (you know, with previously hidden seams deliberately turned to the garment's outside/exterior), and there's "deconstruction" in architecture... Why not in city engineering? Just a small patch (or two)... Just where the dip is the deepest (close to the sidewalks, at the NE and SE corners), with regular asphalt elsewhere on road... Just open those patches, footbridges in something "dead sexy," like gridded/mesh stainless steel over top, very industrial-looking, with a peek-a-boo view to nature doing her thing beneath... Something new to look at, the earth revealed, bogs, streams, subterranean doings... Oh well, dream on!
#53
Posted 24 February 2007 - 10:17 PM
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#54
Posted 24 February 2007 - 11:14 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#55
Posted 24 February 2007 - 11:39 PM
boggy pond.
Boggy Pond would be a good name for a rock band.
#56
Posted 25 February 2007 - 08:45 AM
#57
Posted 25 February 2007 - 09:26 AM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#58
Posted 25 February 2007 - 11:04 AM
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891
#59
Posted 25 February 2007 - 11:32 AM
UVic has a program in ecological restoration. Wonder if they've ever looked at what's going on at View & Vancouver?
#60
Posted 25 February 2007 - 11:56 AM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users