But is it a valid venue for discussion when a proponent is barely able to convey his message?
It took six years for Dave Chard to start development of his James Bay project. Six. Years. He nearly gave up as did the previous two proponents on that lot but he managed to stick through it.
Six years.
I'm not clear on your point. If of the people who care, most did not like Dave Chard's buildings, than I don't care if he spends 1000 years trying to get them through, the NA is doing its job. If the NA is not doing its job, as people here seem to imply, then the residents of JB should do something about it.
If the other point is being made - namely that resident's associations should not be able to fence off their own turf from development - then I guess I disagree that this is currently a problem. The NAs are just advisory, and the council can overrule them anytime they want. So if everyone else in Victoria says JB needs gondolas then gondolas they will get.
I'm not saying JBNA is reasonable - I'm just saying that if they are unreasonable the people of JB should do something about it.
Edited by jklymak, 16 December 2013 - 03:34 PM.