Jump to content

      



























Photo

[Downtown Victoria] 937 View/930 Fort condos | 14-floors | Canceled in 2012

Condo Commercial

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
272 replies to this topic

#141 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 13,807 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 03:29 PM

I think would have done alright. The issue isn't View Towers it is just that it has been all alone so long.

Don't think this one is going to happen anyways. I hear it was not popular at City Hall.

#142 jklymak

jklymak
  • Member
  • 3,514 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 03:52 PM

^ Any idea why not? Quibbles about having restaurant space facing N on View, I thought it would be great.

#143 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 13,807 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 04:15 PM

Because the city considered the application for rezoning, a spot rezoning and not according to the approved plan for harris green. Stupid I know.

#144 jklymak

jklymak
  • Member
  • 3,514 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 04:33 PM

^?? I thought Harris Green could have whatever height you wanted, but couldn't have a FSR above 4:1 (or something like that). Is the zoning going to change now that the new downtown plan has been drawn up?

#145 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 13,807 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 08:41 PM

Nope other way round unlimited density but no higher than 9 storeys.

#146 jklymak

jklymak
  • Member
  • 3,514 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:26 PM

^ Well, that is dumb. But the neighborhood plan is now to allow 20 stories, right?

#147 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 16,310 posts

Posted 16 November 2009 - 09:59 PM

^No, I believe the current Harris Green guidelines are still in effect although I think there is a willingness to accept extra height in certain circumstances.

I doubt a 20-storey building would get approval.

#148 hungryryno

hungryryno
  • Member
  • 79 posts

Posted 19 November 2009 - 02:26 PM

I think Victoria needs to make an exception and allow this one to go higher than the eighteen storey "wall" that is View Towers. It would break up the blah that is View Towers if this one was even just 6 or 7 storeys higher, 24-25 storeys.
I cannot believe Victoria ever allowed such ugliness to be built in such a beautiful city.

#149 concorde

concorde
  • Banned
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 19 November 2009 - 04:59 PM

I think Victoria needs to make an exception and allow this one to go higher than the eighteen storey "wall" that is View Towers. It would break up the blah that is View Towers if this one was even just 6 or 7 storeys higher, 24-25 storeys.
I cannot believe Victoria ever allowed such ugliness to be built in such a beautiful city.


The View Towers story is a long one, but a very interesting story. I'm talked to a few people who were on city council at the time. If people want to hear the full story, I could tell it in the next few weeks

#150 Bingo

Bingo
  • Member
  • 16,666 posts

Posted 19 November 2009 - 07:23 PM

I think Victoria needs to make an exception and allow this one to go higher than the eighteen storey "wall" that is View Towers. It would break up the blah that is View Towers if this one was even just 6 or 7 storeys higher, 24-25 storeys.
I cannot believe Victoria ever allowed such ugliness to be built in such a beautiful city.

View Towers was built in the eraly 70's and was ugly when the dug the hole. It's fortunate that they didn't build the second tower on the Fort Street side.

#151 Caramia

Caramia
  • Member
  • 3,835 posts

Posted 19 November 2009 - 07:46 PM

Yes please concord, I there is a thread about it here: http://vibrantvictor...read.php?t=2439
Nowadays most people die of a sort of creeping common sense, and discover when it is too late that the only things one never regrets are one's mistakes.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891

#152 vicbc250

vicbc250
  • Member
  • 34 posts

Posted 21 November 2009 - 08:38 PM

i seen a site accross from view towers a few biuldings down, any ideas?

#153 D.L.

D.L.
  • Member
  • 7,786 posts

Posted 21 November 2009 - 08:43 PM

That was probably this, 947 Fort - http://vibrantvictoria.ca/?p=323



#154 vicbc250

vicbc250
  • Member
  • 34 posts

Posted 26 November 2009 - 05:26 PM

yee it was whats goin there?

#155 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 16,310 posts

Posted 04 January 2010 - 04:31 PM

At the request of City Hall, the height of the tower has been reduced from 17 to 14 storeys.

This will make for a "stumpier" form and will also ensure that View Towers remains the dominant building on the block.

A roof garden has been added to the smaller townhouse building.

#156 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,647 posts

Posted 04 January 2010 - 04:37 PM

Just chop the height by a few floors and call it a day.

What was City Hall's reasoning for the height decrease?

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#157 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 16,310 posts

Posted 04 January 2010 - 04:49 PM

I imagine it had to do with the height greatly exceeding the existing Harris Green guidelines.

#158 sebberry

sebberry

    Resident Housekeeper

  • Moderator
  • 21,515 posts
  • LocationVictoria

Posted 04 January 2010 - 05:05 PM

This will make for a "stumpier" form and will also ensure that View Towers remains the dominant building on the block.


Phew, we were close to losing that landmark's claim to fame.. well.. one of them anyway.:P

Victoria current weather by neighbourhood: Victoria school-based weather station network

Victoria webcams: Big Wave Dave Webcams

 


#159 jklymak

jklymak
  • Member
  • 3,514 posts

Posted 04 January 2010 - 05:36 PM

I imagine it had to do with the height greatly exceeding the existing Harris Green guidelines.


OK, but the existing guidelines are 20 years old, whereas the new plan, that they are supposedly in the process of voting in, calls for buildings up to 19 storeys in HG. Of course this particular site they have a 14-storey sketched on the plan, but I'd assumed this was just as an example.

I suppose I can see the purpose in not having two 20-story buildings cheek and jowl. I wouldn't want all of Harris Green the same height. But a blanket exclusion seems silly if in a year the same proposal would be w/in guidelines.

#160 Caramia

Caramia
  • Member
  • 3,835 posts

Posted 04 January 2010 - 07:39 PM

At the request of City Hall, the height of the tower has been reduced from 17 to 14 storeys.

This will make for a "stumpier" form and will also ensure that View Towers remains the dominant building on the block.

A roof garden has been added to the smaller townhouse building.


GAH!
:(

This is the perfect place for 17 storeys! I wish I could put something in the water to make people WANT density in the core.

What was the DRA's position on it Rob?
Nowadays most people die of a sort of creeping common sense, and discover when it is too late that the only things one never regrets are one's mistakes.
Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900), The Picture of Dorian Gray, 1891

You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users