Jump to content

      



























Photo

[Downtown Victoria] View Towers | 19-storeys | Built in 1960's

Rental

  • Please log in to reply
383 replies to this topic

#221 Bingo

Bingo
  • Member
  • 16,666 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 07:58 AM

Are those the only suites being used?



#222 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 08:03 AM

Are those the only suites being used?

 

I'm going to guess that some type of renovation or repair is happening that means they have to take one of the stairwells out of service.  View Towers just has two sets of stairs, one at each end of the long hall.  So this one is required for safety.


<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#223 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,848 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 08:04 AM

There's virtually nothing that could make this building look worse.



#224 Bingo

Bingo
  • Member
  • 16,666 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 08:11 AM

I like the look of those stairs and I think we need to bring back the fire escapes on the outside of the building to keep people from urinating in the stairwells.


  • Nparker likes this

#225 Sparky

Sparky

    GET OFF MY LAWN

  • Moderator
  • 13,153 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 09:49 AM

I'm going to guess that some type of renovation or repair is happening that means they have to take one of the stairwells out of service.  View Towers just has two sets of stairs, one at each end of the long hall.  So this one is required for safety.

 

This is exactly correct. They will be blocking off the east part of the lower floors for remediation after the fire. Access to the temporary stairs will be through one of the suites on each floor.

Additional fire alarm detectors, lighting etc will be installed to meet the codes.



#226 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 40,848 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 10:06 AM

...They will be blocking off the east part of the lower floors for remediation after the fire...

Glad they got right on that. It's only been 15 months since the fire after all.



#227 johnk

johnk
  • Member
  • 1,608 posts

Posted 23 August 2015 - 10:57 AM

I like the look of those stairs and I think we need to bring back the fire escapes on the outside of the building to keep people from urinating in the stairwells.


Umbrella advisory!
  • todd likes this

#228 Sparky

Sparky

    GET OFF MY LAWN

  • Moderator
  • 13,153 posts

Posted 24 August 2015 - 05:44 AM

Glad they got right on that. It's only been 15 months since the fire after all.


There are a lot of engineering and permit hoops to jump through with a building like this.

Rome wasn't wired in a day. :)

#229 Redd42

Redd42
  • Member
  • 1,502 posts

Posted 20 March 2016 - 08:45 PM

Was in this neighbourhood this evening. The building looked awfully dark. Are most of the suites vacant? It sure looked that way, particularly the lower flours. What would be the reason for owning this building but not renting out most of the suites?



#230 Bingo

Bingo
  • Member
  • 16,666 posts

Posted 20 March 2016 - 09:12 PM

There are a lot of engineering and permit hoops to jump through with a building like this.

Rome wasn't wired in a day. :)

 

Nero was. :)



#231 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,617 posts

Posted 21 March 2016 - 05:03 AM

Perhaps it's still being remediated following a fire about two years ago. I see the scaffolding is still up.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#232 sdwright.vic

sdwright.vic

    Colwood

  • Member
  • 6,685 posts

Posted 21 March 2016 - 05:05 AM

^ The windows are still burnt out in the suite that had the fire.
Predictive text and a tiny keyboard are not my friends!

#233 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 83,617 posts

Posted 21 March 2016 - 05:11 AM

This is taking an overly long time.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#234 sdwright.vic

sdwright.vic

    Colwood

  • Member
  • 6,685 posts

Posted 21 March 2016 - 06:02 AM

Ya think? The suite above has its windows boarded up at least.
Predictive text and a tiny keyboard are not my friends!

#235 sdwright.vic

sdwright.vic

    Colwood

  • Member
  • 6,685 posts

Posted 22 March 2016 - 05:11 AM

They boarded them up finally!

Attached Images

  • 20160321_074016.jpg

Predictive text and a tiny keyboard are not my friends!

#236 sdwright.vic

sdwright.vic

    Colwood

  • Member
  • 6,685 posts

Posted 22 March 2016 - 05:12 AM

^Now I know what you mean about phone uploads.
  • Matt R. likes this
Predictive text and a tiny keyboard are not my friends!

#237 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 08 February 2017 - 11:29 PM

I was looking at it last night, it looked like 35% of the Fort side was vacant.


<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#238 Baro

Baro
  • Member
  • 4,317 posts

Posted 09 February 2017 - 01:59 PM

How has this taken so extremely long with the units still not available for occupancy?


"beats greezy have baked donut-dough"

#239 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 16,310 posts

Posted 09 February 2017 - 02:46 PM

Just shy of three years since the fire.

 

Compared with the 10 storey Escher condo, which broke ground April 2015 and should be completed sometime this summer. That's just over two years.



#240 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 09 February 2017 - 02:48 PM

How has this taken so extremely long with the units still not available for occupancy?

 

I think the are just plain strange owners.


<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

You're not quite at the end of this discussion topic!

Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users