What they need, I believe, is strict abstinence-based addiction recovery treatment programmes provided for them in safe social housing, and certainly not more needle exchange programs or so-called 'safe-injection sites.' My position has nothing to do with the legality or illegality of the substances they are abusing, but rather is based on a common sense approach that recognizes that they are sick, and that the City has been paying lip-service to their needs for years, blaming its inertia on lack of funds from higher levels of government. This is a disgraceful cop-out.
Are you saying that all "traditional" recovery based treatment should be removed completely? Because I think, apart from many concerns I have of this idea, this could be very dangerous for addicts. Many addicts have died from the symptoms related to withdrawl. Also, it just opens a massive floodgate of problems that I don't feel, based on my very minimal education on addiction I will add, is encouraged by the medical world.
I ask this because I remember reading about your platform during the last election and I was encouraged by your abstinence-based treatment idea. But I was under the impression that this would be a program added as another option - in addition to traditional treament.
Sorry Mods. I just can't help it. But you have to expect an organic meandering from the topic once and a while.