![]() | BUILT Pacific View, phase 1 Use: condo Address: 300 Belmont Road Municipality: Colwood Region: West Shore Storeys: 4 Condo units: (2BR) Sales status: sold out / resales only |
Learn more about Pacific View, phase 1 on Citified.ca

[Colwood] Pacific View condos | 4- & 4-storeys | Phase 1 built; phase 2 approved
#21
Posted 21 September 2006 - 06:55 PM
Also Seattle is not a good city to emulate as they have a relatively small downtown population and perhaps some of the most congested streets around outside Los Angeles.
While I agree we need to stop looking to see what Vancouver is doing I also think we need to take a good hard look at what we are doing. Seriously the 41 storey tower is not going to built but if it were I would not be happy about it. I mean how long ago was the 17 storey tower approved like a year ago and still nothing. This is just some way of increasing land values not anything to do with actually building buildings.
#22
Posted 21 September 2006 - 07:10 PM
I have no desire to see Victoria or Vancouver end up looking like Calgary or Halifax or any other place.
As for Nanaimo, that tall building is going to look absolutely stupid. It's totally out of context and I strongly suspect little Nanaimo has itself in a bind on this one. If the developer comes to the city again and says it needs another ten stories, what are they going to do? Refuse? They can't refuse, because the alternative is a tiny downtown with a gigantic hole in it.
I mean, at certain times of the day the shadow of that building going up in Nanaimo will cover more ground beyond the edge of downtown Nanaimo than it will cover within downtown itself. That's just silly. As small as it was, Nanaimo had a real downtown. But the powers that be there just weren't patient enough to wait 100 years to see it develop properly, naturally. Now they're risking ruining what they did have to try to emulate some generic large city concept. It could backfire. A very tall building in a very small city won't make the small city feel any bigger. It'll just stick out like a sore thumb.
Nanaimo desperately wants an identity, an image to sell. That Beacon highrise is featured in the official Nanaimo tourist publication something like seven or eight times. I believe they should have tried to pad their core with a good range of buildings at various heights. I'm convinced it would have been a better way to develop a recognizable and memorable image for the city.
In Langford's case, they're trying to build a totally new context. Nobody has them by the balls. Thus, if they want to go this taller/fewer route then I suppose it's their business. As a Victorian I would have preferred to see two or three shorter buildings out there than one very tall one.
#23
Posted 21 September 2006 - 08:48 PM
The Michelle also has no character to it. It looks like it's just a generic glass tower
#24
Posted 21 September 2006 - 09:14 PM
We have to remember that there will always be demand for SFD's regardless of how many condo's go on the market. Yes, height will reduce demand for land - for highrises - but the market for SFD is a completely different facet.
Sure condos create a culture of people realizing that backyards and basements are overated, but there will always be people whom love SFD's, have kids, pets, a woodworking hobby, whatever. Sure, all of those things can be compromised when living in a condo, but you'd have to be pretty devoted to your cause to reducing sprawl if you have three kids, a dog, a cat and live in a 2 bedroom condo that's probably going to cost you close to 500 G's anyway.
#25
Posted 21 September 2006 - 09:34 PM
43 stories...I will ask if I can post it and the developer etc.
at least they will be planned to stand together.
#26
Posted 21 September 2006 - 09:38 PM
#27
Posted 21 September 2006 - 10:45 PM
Better than not being known at all.
#28
Posted 21 September 2006 - 10:48 PM

#29
Posted 22 September 2006 - 02:27 AM
3 over 40 floors, now thats what i call a development push
#30
Posted 22 September 2006 - 06:29 AM
#31
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:05 AM
I do not mind WestCom building these high-rises, as long as the are architectually pleasing to the eyes and they are somewhat grouped together... the latter probably won't happen with two municipalities both wanting to build up. And you can allready see that in Langford, as a 20-storey is approved for Sooke / Jacklin and 15-storey for Jacklin / Station.
Victoria neesd to wake up and allow higher buildings, it is already looking like a wall. Chateau Vic - 18, Executive House - 17, Marriott - 16, Astoria - 21, Belvedere - 15?, Falls Vic - 14 & 18. All in 2 square blocks!
We need some above 25, I hope the old Bay condos are approved, so there is some differential.
#32
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:22 AM
#33
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:26 AM
#34
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:33 AM
Also people (residences) can have as much punch as this community association. IT all comes down to public support.
#35
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:33 AM
#36
Posted 22 September 2006 - 11:49 AM
#37
Posted 22 September 2006 - 06:27 PM
#38
Posted 22 September 2006 - 06:45 PM
that's why I want something taller, I ate a flat skyline. I hope it comes in at over 20 at the end....Word has it that it's something cool!

-City of Victoria website, 2009
#39
Posted 22 September 2006 - 06:53 PM
Oh my....that was so funny!!! hahaha....good one!!!

#40
Posted 22 September 2006 - 08:16 PM
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users