Did you know that BP created the concept of the carbon footprint, which today is a favourite phrase and concept of environmentalists and environmental pursuits? It was a marketing scheme to deflect from what was happening in the Gulf of Mexico, and it put the onus of conservation on you and I, and not the energy companies, or the governments that really, really appreciate the dollars they get from the energy companies by being so interwoven with them.Do you know what's my favourite study this one https://www.science....science.abk0063 from exonn mobile from all the way back in 1977. That warned of man made climate change from the burning of fossil fuels, resulting in increased temperatures. Which suprise surprise was shelved by the company execs to keep the public in the dark. Then spent hundreds of millions to muddy the waters by trying to convince people that first off climate change wasn't real, then that it isn't anthropogenic.
There is tremendous value in creating the impression that what you’re doing carries a cost over and above your direct action, because then you are more likely to accept paying more for something. Climate change and the energy industry go hand in hand, by creating and perpetuating the notion of a finite resource, for which you have to pay more to consume because of its down-the-line impacts. We know this to be true, as energy companies make record high profits despite the push to reduce energy consumption and carbon taxes that are meant to force your hand to use less energy.
And as our energy needs grow, we’re pumping more oil than ever.
So who are the real winners here? You and I, the environment, or energy and government?