Playground
#21
Posted 19 February 2007 - 05:29 PM
It was maybe 1.5 stories tall.. 15 feet or so. For the longest time I was so scared to go down that slide, but when I finally did I found out it was the best in the city. it also had a fire-pole!
A kid should have to actually die to get such a thing removed, that slide was definately worth at least 1 child's live, no lesser trade.
#22
Posted 19 February 2007 - 05:47 PM
I loved the old merry-go-rounds... although I applauded the shift to sand around them from concrete.
#23
Posted 19 February 2007 - 05:57 PM
#24
Posted 19 February 2007 - 08:47 PM
#25
Posted 14 April 2007 - 09:12 AM
Times Colonist
Published: Saturday, April 14, 2007
I was born in Victoria and would like to know if anyone remembers way back when -- probably 1940 or so -- a children's slide in the playground at Beacon Hill Park that was very high. You slid down by wrapping your legs and arms around the two poles and there was no centre to this slide. In today's world it would be considered far too dangerous, but I guess we were tough little kids.
I have asked a few people and no one knows what I am talking about. There must be a picture of it somewhere. I sure would like to know that I am not dreaming it.
Ena Holt,
Chemainus.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#26
Posted 14 April 2007 - 02:27 PM
#27
Posted 14 April 2007 - 02:40 PM
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#28
Posted 14 April 2007 - 03:00 PM
#29
Posted 24 April 2007 - 11:24 AM
Wanted: Photos of Beacon Hill slide
Times Colonist
Published: Saturday, April 14, 2007
I was born in Victoria and would like to know if anyone remembers way back when -- probably 1940 or so -- a children's slide in the playground at Beacon Hill Park that was very high. You slid down by wrapping your legs and arms around the two poles and there was no centre to this slide. In today's world it would be considered far too dangerous, but I guess we were tough little kids.
I have asked a few people and no one knows what I am talking about. There must be a picture of it somewhere. I sure would like to know that I am not dreaming it.
Ena Holt,
Chemainus.
Yes, Beacon Hill once had a slide
Times Colonist
Published: Tuesday, April 24, 2007
I can confirm that the slide in Beacon Hill Park existed.
I have never forgotten it because one day I slipped and fell through the rails to land on my knees which bled appropriately.
There was little sympathy when I got home.
Aubrey W. Bell,
Staffin, Skye, Scotland.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#30
Posted 24 April 2007 - 11:46 AM
This really is a strange town.
#31
Posted 24 April 2007 - 12:25 PM
#32
Posted 24 April 2007 - 02:32 PM
You know what's really dumb about it? There used to be four swings, now they've reduced it to just two. One infant swing and one older child swing. They reduced the amount of swings in Beacon Hill when they recently replaced that one. The swings are always on high demand. Why would they reduce them? It's not like there's no room. These higher tech playgrounds take up even less room than the old arm-breakers.
#33
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:04 PM
#34
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:15 PM
Sounds like it exactly fits Victoria's 1.3 children per household demographic--1.3 swings per playground.
That's what happens when statisticians design playgrounds.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#35
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:57 PM
It's an interesting article, although I'm wary/ suspicious of some of the conclusions (not to mention the people) behind it (re. the people: Prince Charles' -- aka Blithering Twit -- clique...) On the other hand, we only have to look at Centennial Square to see how "designer space" can fail, so maybe we plebs are right.
But I just don't get this assessment:
“Most public spaces that people use are local spaces they visit regularly, often quite banal in design, or untidy in their activities or functions, such as street markets and car boot sales,” the report said.
It seems a stretch to say that spaces designed by master architects like -- oh, say, the Spanish Steps in Rome -- are "banal" or that just because some of our contemporary designed spaces don't seem to grab people we actually should go back to non-design. The folks behind this report seem to have it in for modernism (or what they also might refer to as "metropolitanism") and that taints their agenda...
Ooops, did I just derail this thread...? :oops:
#36
Posted 24 April 2007 - 06:40 PM
Councillor Madoff was shown on A-Channel cutting the ribbon for the new park. Shortly thereafter, the children were given a stern rebuke, after being warned that City Councillors are NOT climbing equipment.
-City of Victoria website, 2009
#37
Posted 24 April 2007 - 07:24 PM
I see a missed opportunity with the two "water features" one soft and the other hard edged which are connected by a "notional" stream inscribed in the concrete pavers... Was there a need to have two different "styles"?
Are they using ground water from the buildings that has to be pumped into the storm drain, or are they using the drinking water supply?
I also find that the hard edged water feature, sometimes inhabited by a duck, to lack sufficient volume to mask the urban traffic noise..
Wonder what events will occur there? Who would have the "juice" to shut down that part of Humboldt for a block party when the Aria is finished?
#38
Posted 24 April 2007 - 07:42 PM
#39
Posted 24 April 2007 - 07:47 PM
#40
Posted 24 April 2007 - 07:48 PM
Edit..
I see all the qualifiers you are inserting...
I see value in looking it as useable open space...
I'm sure that an urban studies student would have fun categorizing it a la Alexander's community and privacy.. doing a land use survey to sort out the ped areas from the driveways and from the soft and hard landscaping... I even see some Jane Jacobs bits there..
The city folks already have had their fun measuring and scaleing to ensure that it meets the rules re-zoned for each individual property..
So let's now see how it will actually get used...
Use the page links at the lower-left to go to the next page to read additional posts.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users