Jump to content

      













Photo

Journalism, Online Media and Freedom of the Press.


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#21 Wayne

Wayne
  • Member
  • 567 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 07:41 AM

Trump pardons Conrad Black.

 

 

http://www.msn.com/e...p5&ocid=DELLDHP



#22 lanforod

lanforod
  • Member
  • 7,091 posts
  • LocationSaanich

Posted 16 May 2019 - 07:44 AM

Surely you’ve m heard of a takedown before? It’s the same thing as taken down. Dust got the right meaning, as in a takedown/taken down is an apprehension/arrest.

 

Maybe I read the article differently, but I didn't read anywhere that the journalist was arrested or apprehended. Only that his place was forcibly searched and his data taken.



#23 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 08:01 AM

He doesn’t have to be arrested to be taken down.

Why is this so difficult? Do I need to list the 500 different forms of interaction/outcome where police forcibly engage with a civilian? :)

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#24 Rob Randall

Rob Randall
  • Member
  • 9,559 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 08:29 AM

If they had killed the journalist, I would have said he'd have been shot and killed, not taken down at gunpoint.

 

Taken down at gunpoint is a common phrase referring to police subduing someone with their guns drawn, and the CBC agrees.

 

"Taken down" in this context implies forcible restraint was used. From everything I've read he was simply handcuffed and was not resisting. When describing situations like this it's best to avoid ambiguous and misleading terms.


"[Randall's] aesthetic poll was more accurate than his political acumen"

-Tom Hawthorne, Toronto Globe and Mail


#25 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 08:42 AM

No it doesn’t.

A police take down only results in force against the person if they resist.

His home was raided. Battering ram. Guns drawn. All that stuff. What happens to the target when police pursue their take down is up to the target. But the intent of the action is to shock and induce compliance/submission without resorting to physical harm.

But when a dozen officers returned to his home on Friday, this time their guns were drawn and they came equipped with a search warrant, a sledgehammer and a battering ram.

In an interview Monday, as concern spread among journalists and civil rights activists about his treatment, Mr. Carmody said his wrists were still sore from being handcuffed for six hours while the police raided his house and seized laptops, phones and hard drives — including all the images and documents he had archived from his 29-year career as a reporter and cameraman.


Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#26 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 08:47 AM

Have you guys never watched an episode of Cops? 48 Hours? To Serve and Protect?

Police don’t use any physical force during takedowns unless it is absolutely required or justified. If the suspect doesn’t resist, but they get physically injured by police, that’s called assault, and it opens up a whole ‘nother can of worms cops want nothing to do with.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#27 Benezet

Benezet
  • Member
  • 1,026 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 11:42 AM

Have you guys never watched an episode of Cops? 48 Hours? To Serve and Protect?...


No, but I did see Serpico...
  • Mike K. likes this

#28 lanforod

lanforod
  • Member
  • 7,091 posts
  • LocationSaanich

Posted 16 May 2019 - 12:04 PM

Just having this conversation implies that your wording is questionable, Mike. You don't want people wondering what you meant when you're trying to describe the facts.

 

Obviously, you're turning a blind eye to our feedback, and that's your prerogative... but man, can't you take a little constructive criticism? That's all it was.



#29 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 16 May 2019 - 12:31 PM

You likened it to the spread of fake news. Anyone would take issue with someone misunderstanding a commonly used term for exactly the situation as described, and alleging its use is deceitful.

I stand by every word I wrote, but it’s all good though, no harm done, and I’m glad we had the conversation.

But the wording is hardly the issue. The issue is a police raid on a journalist who refused to reveal a source. This is no small matter, and one of the most serious North overreaches (in my opinion) observed regarding a journalist.
  • lanforod likes this

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#30 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,283 posts

Posted 23 May 2019 - 06:19 AM

But Unifor is the union that turned nakedly partisan during the 2015 election campaign, fundinglie-filled attack ads against Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and mortifying many journalist members whose credibility depends on their perceived political independence. More recently, Unifor’s executives have collectively styled themselves “Andrew Scheer’s worst nightmare,” eliciting more futile pleas from journalists to shut up.

Well, those were the days. Now the government that benefited from Unifor’s partisan largesse has asked it for help deciding who’s a proper journalist and what’s a proper news outlet, and thus worthy of government largesse! If Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez had explicitly set out to bolster the notion that Canadian media are bought and paid for by the Liberal Party of Canada, he could have done no better.

- https://nationalpost...of-the-chickens

The Trudeau government’s move to subsidize a dying media industry is now underway. Deciding who gets a piece of a $600 million taxpayer funded pie are “independent” panel members, like one from Unifor, a mega-union that declared itself Andrew Scheer’s worst nightmare last fall.

Journalism in Canada is a partisan industry now, dependant on government handouts decided on by the likes of ultra-partisan Unifor and other ultra-partisan gatekeepers.

Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#31 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 3,781 posts

Posted 24 May 2019 - 02:22 AM

The news release put out Wednesday by Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez begins well: "The Government of Canada understands that for a democracy to function properly, it needs to have solid, independent news media."

If only he had stopped there. But instead, the release goes on for another 700 words to outline a plan whose principal effect will be to undermine the independence of the news media.




https://www.cbc.ca/n...ilout-1.5147053

#32 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 3,781 posts

Posted 25 May 2019 - 03:43 PM

screenshot-twitter.com-2019.05.25-19-42-20.png



#33 Victoria Watcher

Victoria Watcher
  • Member
  • 3,781 posts

Posted 26 May 2019 - 08:43 AM

screenshot-twitter.com-2019.05.26-12-41-58.png



 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users