Jump to content

      













Photo

[North Park] 1046/48 North Park Street | unknown | 4-storeys


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 01 December 2016 - 01:35 PM

http://www.npna.ca/w.../Site-Plans.pdf

 

screenshot-oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm 2016-12-01 13-33-21.png

 

 


<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#2 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 01 December 2016 - 01:36 PM

It's better than what's currently there.

1046 NPark.JPG


Edited by Nparker, 01 December 2016 - 01:38 PM.


#3 Mike K.

Mike K.
  • Administrator
  • 48,701 posts

Posted 02 December 2016 - 08:31 AM

I see it's being referred to as "supportive housing."


Know it all.
Citified.ca is Victoria's most comprehensive research resource for new-build homes and commercial spaces.


#4 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 02 December 2016 - 09:13 AM

I see it's being referred to as "supportive housing."

It appears to be designed like a sort of "group home". Is that term still acceptable? I wonder what agency intends to use this project if approved and completed.

FYI: I believe a former NPNA board members owns - or used to own - the house that currently sits on part of the land for this project. The section behind the trees on the photo above.



#5 Kapten Kapsell

Kapten Kapsell
  • Member
  • 2,128 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 03:02 PM

The developers behind the Mt St Angela proposal are proposing to build a 4-storey supportive housing development at 1046/1048 North Park Street.  The project contains 34 units, and patients at the existing Mt St Angela facility on Burdett will be transferred here to facilitate the redevelopment of the Burdett site as seniors housing.

 

Elevation Rendering: 

npSupportiveHousing.JPG

 

Additional Information:

https://tender.victo...Number=REZ00632

 



#6 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 03:13 PM

This is going to be almost as ugly as 1032 North Park.

1032.JPG



#7 VicHockeyFan

VicHockeyFan
  • Suspended User
  • 52,121 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 03:44 PM

The outdoor toilet should never have passed scrutiny, for sure.


  • Nparker likes this
<p><span style="font-size:12px;"><em><span style="color:rgb(40,40,40);font-family:helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">"I don’t need a middle person in my pizza slice transaction" <strong>- zoomer, April 17, 2018</strong></span></em></span>

#8 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 03:53 PM

The outdoor toilet should never have passed scrutiny, for sure.

To be fair, it is colour-coordinated.



#9 Kapten Kapsell

Kapten Kapsell
  • Member
  • 2,128 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 04:17 PM

Also to be fair: the grey/brown “21st century moderne” look seems to be showing up everywhere...

Edited by Kapten Kapsell, 23 February 2018 - 04:18 PM.


#10 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 04:21 PM

Also to be fair: the grey/brown “21st century moderne” look seems to be showing up everywhere...

Have you actually visited 1032 North Park? It is gawd-awful ugly and cheap looking. The photo above doesn't begin to illustrate its wretchedness.



#11 G-Man

G-Man

    Senior Case Officer

  • Moderator
  • 12,708 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:26 PM

This has been considered for this site for almost 10 years. I am surprised it is back. Also looks like no real changes. It would good if it had some street level retail.
  • Nparker likes this

Visit my blog at: https://www.sidewalkingvictoria.com 

 

It has a whole new look!

 


#12 Nparker

Nparker
  • Member
  • 23,078 posts

Posted 23 February 2018 - 08:54 PM

Its massing and general design elements are just too similar to the hideousness of 1032 North Park for my liking.

1048 N Park.JPG

1048 N Park detail.JPG

Perhaps it will be better in execution than the renderings suggest.



#13 Kapten Kapsell

Kapten Kapsell
  • Member
  • 2,128 posts

Posted 26 March 2019 - 06:06 PM

This proposal has been revised. 

 

New rendering:

Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 7.03.07 PM.png

 

From the developer:

"This application proposes to re-develop the property to a purpose built 34 unit building for housing people with varying degrees of mental illness.As part of the redevelopment of the Mount St Angela project for Seniors Living, the owner has acquired the North Park St properties and is committed to transitioning the patients currently residing at Mt St. Angela to the new build.... The proposed project will house approximately 34 below market rooms which are completely furnished, self contained micro units with bed/sitting area, storage, and share a full bathroom."



 



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users