I am not a structural engineer either but reading the report that AJNP provided, this doesn't appear to be trivial oversights that would have been perfectly fine a few years ago.
When I read things like overall foundation and core footings not being adequate then you have to ask how this building is "fixed" without taking it down? Perhaps that is the dilemma the parties faced earlier.
This is what I'm wondering.. How did they let people back in only for a couple years later to test it again to find it still in bad shape?